[Pharmacological correction of burning eye syndrome].

Q3 Medicine
T N Safonova, E S Medvedeva
{"title":"[Pharmacological correction of burning eye syndrome].","authors":"T N Safonova, E S Medvedeva","doi":"10.17116/oftalma202514102151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burning eye syndrome (BES) is a subtype of dry eye syndrome (DES) characterized by neuropathic pain that is resistant to conventional DES therapy aimed at restoring tear film stability. The lack of impact on the corneal neural pathways is the reason for ineffectiveness of such treatment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel treatment regimen for BES.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included patients aged 18-45 years diagnosed with BES. The criterion for exclusion from the study was the presence of clinical signs of blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, as well as existing rheumatologic or oncologic diseases. The follow-up period was 12 months. All patients underwent standard and specialized ophthalmic examinations. They were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 received gabapentin combined with neuroprotective therapy (thioctic acid, ipidacrine, and B vitamins) and topical 0.4% hyaluronic acid (HA) four times daily, while group 2 received only tear substitution therapy with 0.4% HA four times daily. Treatment efficacy was assessed using subjective (the Russian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-20) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) and objective (laser corneal confocal microscopy and tearscopy) evaluation methods. Therapeutic effectiveness was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the third month, patients in group 1 reported subjective improvement based on CSI-20 and VAS scores, while objective findings demonstrated decreased tear osmolarity, increased anisotropy coefficient of nerve fiber orientation, and an increase in nerve fiber length. No significant changes were observed in group 2 over the same period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed treatment regimen, incorporating gabapentin along with neuroprotective therapy (thioctic acid, ipidacrine, and B vitamins) and topical 0.4% HA, proved more effective in alleviating neuropathic pain in BES compared to isolated topical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23529,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik oftalmologii","volume":"141 2","pages":"51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik oftalmologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202514102151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burning eye syndrome (BES) is a subtype of dry eye syndrome (DES) characterized by neuropathic pain that is resistant to conventional DES therapy aimed at restoring tear film stability. The lack of impact on the corneal neural pathways is the reason for ineffectiveness of such treatment.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel treatment regimen for BES.

Material and methods: The study included patients aged 18-45 years diagnosed with BES. The criterion for exclusion from the study was the presence of clinical signs of blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, as well as existing rheumatologic or oncologic diseases. The follow-up period was 12 months. All patients underwent standard and specialized ophthalmic examinations. They were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 received gabapentin combined with neuroprotective therapy (thioctic acid, ipidacrine, and B vitamins) and topical 0.4% hyaluronic acid (HA) four times daily, while group 2 received only tear substitution therapy with 0.4% HA four times daily. Treatment efficacy was assessed using subjective (the Russian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-20) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) and objective (laser corneal confocal microscopy and tearscopy) evaluation methods. Therapeutic effectiveness was assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results: By the third month, patients in group 1 reported subjective improvement based on CSI-20 and VAS scores, while objective findings demonstrated decreased tear osmolarity, increased anisotropy coefficient of nerve fiber orientation, and an increase in nerve fiber length. No significant changes were observed in group 2 over the same period.

Conclusion: The proposed treatment regimen, incorporating gabapentin along with neuroprotective therapy (thioctic acid, ipidacrine, and B vitamins) and topical 0.4% HA, proved more effective in alleviating neuropathic pain in BES compared to isolated topical therapy.

【灼眼综合征的药物矫正】。
灼眼综合征(BES)是干眼综合征(DES)的一种亚型,以神经性疼痛为特征,对旨在恢复泪膜稳定性的传统DES治疗有抵抗性。缺乏对角膜神经通路的影响是这种治疗无效的原因。目的:本研究评估一种治疗BES的新方案的有效性。材料和方法:研究对象为年龄18-45岁的BES患者。排除研究的标准是存在睑炎、睑板腺功能障碍的临床症状,以及现有的风湿病或肿瘤疾病。随访期为12个月。所有患者均接受了标准和专业的眼科检查。随机分为两组:1组给予加巴喷丁联合神经保护治疗(硫辛酸、伊匹克林和B维生素)和局部使用0.4%透明质酸(HA),每日4次;2组只给予含0.4%透明质酸的泪液替代治疗,每日4次。采用主观(俄文版中枢致敏量表(CSI-20)和视觉模拟量表(VAS))和客观(激光角膜共聚焦显微镜和泪镜)评价方法评估治疗效果。在3、6和12个月时评估治疗效果。结果:到第3个月时,第一组患者的CSI-20和VAS评分主观改善,而客观结果显示泪液渗透压降低,神经纤维取向各向异性系数增加,神经纤维长度增加。第二组同期无明显变化。结论:与单独局部治疗相比,加巴喷丁联合神经保护治疗(硫辛酸、伊匹克林和B族维生素)和外用0.4% HA的治疗方案在缓解BES神经性疼痛方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vestnik oftalmologii
Vestnik oftalmologii Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The journal publishes materials on the diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases, hygiene of vision, prevention of ophthalmic affections, history of Russian ophthalmology, organization of ophthalmological aid to the population, as well as the problems of special equipment. Original scientific articles and surveys on urgent problems of theory and practice of Russian and foreign ophthalmology are published. The journal contains book reviews on ophthalmology, information on the activities of ophthalmologists" scientific societies, chronicle of congresses and conferences.The journal is intended for ophthalmologists and scientific workers dealing with clinical problems of diseases of the eye and physiology of vision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信