Association of eNOS T786C genetic polymorphism with the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Translational Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-04-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/tnsci-2025-0368
Josip Ljevak, Kristina Gotovac Jerčić, Antonela Blažeković, David Ozretić, Ivan Perić, Nikola Blažević, Fran Borovečki, Zdravka Poljaković Skurić
{"title":"Association of eNOS T786C genetic polymorphism with the risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.","authors":"Josip Ljevak, Kristina Gotovac Jerčić, Antonela Blažeković, David Ozretić, Ivan Perić, Nikola Blažević, Fran Borovečki, Zdravka Poljaković Skurić","doi":"10.1515/tnsci-2025-0368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are increasingly detected due to advancements in neuroimaging. Despite improvements in treatment, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Treatment decisions for IA are complex and individualized, considering aneurysm and patient-related risk factors. Genetic factors, particularly endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) polymorphisms, have been implicated in IA formation and rupture risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated the association between three eNOS polymorphisms (27-bp-VNTR, T786C, and G894T) and aSAH in a cohort of 275 patients with unruptured IA or aSAH. Patients were followed for at least 8 years with clinical and imaging assessments. Genotyping of selected polymorphisms was performed, and statistical analyses were conducted to identify interactions between genetic polymorphisms and established risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference in the frequencies of genotypes and allele carriers of the T786C polymorphism was observed between patients with unruptured IA and those with aSAH, with an increased proportion of CC homozygotes in the aSAH group. The risk of rupture was higher in patients with the CC genotype. Multilobular aneurysms and those located in the posterior circulation had a higher incidence of rupture. Associations between arterial hypertension and certain genotypes were also found. However, no significant interaction was observed between the polymorphisms and established risk factors in relation to aneurysm rupture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data showed a significant and independent correlation between eNOS genetic polymorphism T786C and aSAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":23227,"journal":{"name":"Translational Neuroscience","volume":"16 1","pages":"20250368"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tnsci-2025-0368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are increasingly detected due to advancements in neuroimaging. Despite improvements in treatment, aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Treatment decisions for IA are complex and individualized, considering aneurysm and patient-related risk factors. Genetic factors, particularly endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) polymorphisms, have been implicated in IA formation and rupture risk.

Methods: This study investigated the association between three eNOS polymorphisms (27-bp-VNTR, T786C, and G894T) and aSAH in a cohort of 275 patients with unruptured IA or aSAH. Patients were followed for at least 8 years with clinical and imaging assessments. Genotyping of selected polymorphisms was performed, and statistical analyses were conducted to identify interactions between genetic polymorphisms and established risk factors.

Results: A significant difference in the frequencies of genotypes and allele carriers of the T786C polymorphism was observed between patients with unruptured IA and those with aSAH, with an increased proportion of CC homozygotes in the aSAH group. The risk of rupture was higher in patients with the CC genotype. Multilobular aneurysms and those located in the posterior circulation had a higher incidence of rupture. Associations between arterial hypertension and certain genotypes were also found. However, no significant interaction was observed between the polymorphisms and established risk factors in relation to aneurysm rupture.

Conclusion: Our data showed a significant and independent correlation between eNOS genetic polymorphism T786C and aSAH.

eNOS T786C基因多态性与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血风险的关系
背景:由于神经影像学的进步,未破裂的颅内动脉瘤(IAs)越来越多地被发现。尽管治疗有所改善,动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)仍与高死亡率和发病率相关。考虑到动脉瘤和患者相关的危险因素,IA的治疗决定是复杂和个性化的。遗传因素,特别是内皮一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)多态性,与IA的形成和破裂风险有关。方法:本研究在275例未破裂性IA或aSAH患者中研究了三种eNOS多态性(27-bp-VNTR、T786C和G894T)与aSAH的关系。患者随访至少8年,进行临床和影像学评估。对选定的多态性进行基因分型,并进行统计分析,以确定遗传多态性与既定危险因素之间的相互作用。结果:未破裂IA患者与aSAH患者T786C多态性基因型和等位基因携带者频率存在显著差异,aSAH组CC纯合子比例增加。CC基因型患者的血管破裂风险较高。多小叶动脉瘤和位于后循环的动脉瘤有较高的破裂发生率。动脉高血压与某些基因型之间也存在关联。然而,未观察到多态性与动脉瘤破裂相关的既定危险因素之间的显著相互作用。结论:我们的数据显示eNOS基因多态性T786C与aSAH有显著的独立相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Neuroscience provides a closer interaction between basic and clinical neuroscientists to expand understanding of brain structure, function and disease, and translate this knowledge into clinical applications and novel therapies of nervous system disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信