Exploring the Influence of Online Price Anchoring and Attribute Framing on the Likelihood of Hearing Aid Purchases.

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Craig Richard St Jean, Jacqueline Cummine, Gurjit Singh, William Bill Hodgetts
{"title":"Exploring the Influence of Online Price Anchoring and Attribute Framing on the Likelihood of Hearing Aid Purchases.","authors":"Craig Richard St Jean, Jacqueline Cummine, Gurjit Singh, William Bill Hodgetts","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15020040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study investigated whether exposure to various types of information online can influence adults aged 40 and above in their likelihood to purchase hearing aids (HAs). Specifically, it examined the effects of price anchoring, using high or low HA prices in advertisements, and attribute framing, using product descriptions that highlighted lifestyle appeal or technological capabilities. <b>Methods</b>: In a 2 × 2 experimental design, 271 participants browsed a website simulating an online search for hearing health information. Participants then rated their likelihood of purchasing three fictitious HAs as well as their likelihood of not purchasing any device. <b>Results</b>: Two-way ANCOVAs indicated no significant main effects of anchoring or framing on purchase likelihood for the fictitious devices (covariates included self-rated hearing ability, trust in online health information, and HA knowledge and importance). No significant interaction effects emerged. However, exploratory analyses revealed significant anchoring effects for two of the three devices among participants with below-median self-rated hearing. Additionally, self-rated knowledge was a significant covariate in the model for all devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001), positively correlating with purchase likelihood. Participants with above-median self-rated knowledge showed significantly higher purchase likelihood for all devices (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> ≥ 0.572 for all comparisons), while those with below-median knowledge displayed a significant anchoring effect for two outcomes. <b>Conclusions</b>: Enhanced HA knowledge may increase HA purchase likelihood and reduce the potential anchoring effects of online advertising. Further research is needed to determine the impact of exposure to high or low prices on HA purchase decisions, especially among those with poorer hearing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12024096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15020040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study investigated whether exposure to various types of information online can influence adults aged 40 and above in their likelihood to purchase hearing aids (HAs). Specifically, it examined the effects of price anchoring, using high or low HA prices in advertisements, and attribute framing, using product descriptions that highlighted lifestyle appeal or technological capabilities. Methods: In a 2 × 2 experimental design, 271 participants browsed a website simulating an online search for hearing health information. Participants then rated their likelihood of purchasing three fictitious HAs as well as their likelihood of not purchasing any device. Results: Two-way ANCOVAs indicated no significant main effects of anchoring or framing on purchase likelihood for the fictitious devices (covariates included self-rated hearing ability, trust in online health information, and HA knowledge and importance). No significant interaction effects emerged. However, exploratory analyses revealed significant anchoring effects for two of the three devices among participants with below-median self-rated hearing. Additionally, self-rated knowledge was a significant covariate in the model for all devices (p < 0.001), positively correlating with purchase likelihood. Participants with above-median self-rated knowledge showed significantly higher purchase likelihood for all devices (p < 0.001, d ≥ 0.572 for all comparisons), while those with below-median knowledge displayed a significant anchoring effect for two outcomes. Conclusions: Enhanced HA knowledge may increase HA purchase likelihood and reduce the potential anchoring effects of online advertising. Further research is needed to determine the impact of exposure to high or low prices on HA purchase decisions, especially among those with poorer hearing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探讨在线价格锚定和属性框架对助听器购买可能性的影响。
背景/目的:本研究调查了接触各种类型的在线信息是否会影响40岁及以上的成年人购买助听器(HAs)的可能性。具体来说,它检查了价格锚定的影响,在广告中使用高或低的HA价格,以及属性框架,使用突出生活方式吸引力或技术能力的产品描述。方法:采用2 × 2实验设计,271名参与者浏览一个模拟在线搜索听力健康信息的网站。然后,参与者评估了他们购买三种虚拟设备的可能性,以及他们不购买任何设备的可能性。结果:双向ANCOVAs显示,锚定或框架对虚拟设备的购买可能性没有显著的主要影响(协变量包括自评听力能力、对在线健康信息的信任、HA知识和重要性)。没有出现明显的相互作用效应。然而,探索性分析显示,在自评听力低于中位数的参与者中,三种设备中的两种具有显著的锚定效应。此外,自评知识是模型中所有设备的显著协变量(p < 0.001),与购买可能性正相关。自评知识高于中位数的参与者对所有设备的购买可能性显著更高(p < 0.001,所有比较的d≥0.572),而知识低于中位数的参与者对两个结果显示出显著的锚定效应。结论:增强的HA知识可能会增加HA的购买可能性,并降低网络广告的潜在锚定效应。我们需要进一步的研究,以确定高价或低价对买房决定的影响,尤其是对听力较差的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信