Statistics as a Tool in the Physician's Black Bag.

Missouri medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01
Robert W Baer
{"title":"Statistics as a Tool in the Physician's Black Bag.","authors":"Robert W Baer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The era of evidence-based practice began in the 1990s with the hope patient outcomes would be improved by eliminating clinical bias and clinically unsound practices. Clinical guidelines which had been previously written by panels of experts were slowly replaced by careful analysis of existing clinical studies and more rigorous designs of new clinical studies based on sound scientific and statistical principles. This still leaves the practitioner with the responsibility of understanding what the evidence is showing them. This article reviews the statistical thinking that underlies the evidence-based literature. We will review some evolutionary changes to statistical analysis being advocated by statisticians and discuss some nuances related to the use of statistics describing diagnosis and treatment in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74203,"journal":{"name":"Missouri medicine","volume":"122 2","pages":"151-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Missouri medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The era of evidence-based practice began in the 1990s with the hope patient outcomes would be improved by eliminating clinical bias and clinically unsound practices. Clinical guidelines which had been previously written by panels of experts were slowly replaced by careful analysis of existing clinical studies and more rigorous designs of new clinical studies based on sound scientific and statistical principles. This still leaves the practitioner with the responsibility of understanding what the evidence is showing them. This article reviews the statistical thinking that underlies the evidence-based literature. We will review some evolutionary changes to statistical analysis being advocated by statisticians and discuss some nuances related to the use of statistics describing diagnosis and treatment in clinical settings.

统计作为医生黑袋子里的工具。
循证实践的时代始于20世纪90年代,人们希望通过消除临床偏倚和临床不健全的实践来改善患者的预后。以前由专家小组编写的临床指导方针逐渐被对现有临床研究的仔细分析和基于可靠的科学和统计原则的更严格的新临床研究设计所取代。这仍然让从业者有责任理解证据向他们展示了什么。本文回顾了基于循证文献的统计思维。我们将回顾统计学家所提倡的统计分析的一些进化变化,并讨论与临床环境中使用统计描述诊断和治疗相关的一些细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信