Valentin Vervack, Guillaume De Moyer, Lotte Callebaut, Line Vanduffel, Lenz Surdiacourt, Maarten Glibert
{"title":"Retrospective Evaluation of the 'crown-guide': An Innovative Approach for Guided Immediate Implant Placement and Restoration.","authors":"Valentin Vervack, Guillaume De Moyer, Lotte Callebaut, Line Vanduffel, Lenz Surdiacourt, Maarten Glibert","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b6158646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate whether the use of the Crown-Guide - a prefabricated provisional restoration which is incorporated into a surgical pilot guide - results in a predictable esthetic outcome in patients undergoing immediate implant placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients (n=18) in need of a single implant restoration in the anterior region underwent immediate implant placement and loading using the Crown-Guide. Soft tissue grafting was performed in most cases, while bone xenografts were placed in all cases. Photographs, X-rays, and STL-files were collected at specific time points, making it possible to compare clinical, esthetic and radiographic outcomes at these points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean value for the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) measure was 10.73 immediately after implant placement (T1) and 11.46 at least one year after implant placement (T3), while the White Esthetic Score (WES) mean value increased from 5.27 to 8.81 across the same interval. Importantly, for both PES and WES the increases were found to be statistically significant (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). In the cases with scarring (n=5), the MSI (Mucosal Scarring Index) score ranged from 3.5 to 5.25. At time T3, an average bone loss of 0.12mm and an average soft tissue loss of 0.041mm were observed, but both were found to be statistically indistinguishable from zero. The survival rate was 94.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Immediate implant placement using the Crown-Guide offers predictable esthetic and clinical treatment outcomes, making it a practical and viable method. However, larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b6158646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate whether the use of the Crown-Guide - a prefabricated provisional restoration which is incorporated into a surgical pilot guide - results in a predictable esthetic outcome in patients undergoing immediate implant placement.
Materials and methods: Patients (n=18) in need of a single implant restoration in the anterior region underwent immediate implant placement and loading using the Crown-Guide. Soft tissue grafting was performed in most cases, while bone xenografts were placed in all cases. Photographs, X-rays, and STL-files were collected at specific time points, making it possible to compare clinical, esthetic and radiographic outcomes at these points.
Results: The mean value for the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) measure was 10.73 immediately after implant placement (T1) and 11.46 at least one year after implant placement (T3), while the White Esthetic Score (WES) mean value increased from 5.27 to 8.81 across the same interval. Importantly, for both PES and WES the increases were found to be statistically significant (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). In the cases with scarring (n=5), the MSI (Mucosal Scarring Index) score ranged from 3.5 to 5.25. At time T3, an average bone loss of 0.12mm and an average soft tissue loss of 0.041mm were observed, but both were found to be statistically indistinguishable from zero. The survival rate was 94.4%.
Conclusion: Immediate implant placement using the Crown-Guide offers predictable esthetic and clinical treatment outcomes, making it a practical and viable method. However, larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.