Detecting arousals and sleep from respiratory inductance plethysmography.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eysteinn Finnsson, Ernir Erlingsson, Hlynur D Hlynsson, Vaka Valsdóttir, Thora B Sigmarsdottir, Eydís Arnardóttir, Scott A Sands, Sigurður Æ Jónsson, Anna S Islind, Jón S Ágústsson
{"title":"Detecting arousals and sleep from respiratory inductance plethysmography.","authors":"Eysteinn Finnsson, Ernir Erlingsson, Hlynur D Hlynsson, Vaka Valsdóttir, Thora B Sigmarsdottir, Eydís Arnardóttir, Scott A Sands, Sigurður Æ Jónsson, Anna S Islind, Jón S Ágústsson","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03325-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurately identifying sleep states (REM, NREM, and Wake) and brief awakenings (arousals) is essential for diagnosing sleep disorders. Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for such assessments but is costly and requires overnight monitoring in a lab. Home sleep testing (HST) offers a more accessible alternative, relying primarily on breathing measurements but lacks electroencephalography, limiting its ability to evaluate sleep and arousals directly. This study evaluates a deep learning algorithm which determines sleep states and arousals from breathing signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A novel deep learning algorithm was developed to classify sleep states and detect arousals from respiratory inductance plethysmography signals. Sleep states were predicted for 30-s intervals (one sleep epoch), while arousal probabilities were calculated at 1-s resolution. Validation was conducted on a clinical dataset of 1,299 adults with suspected sleep disorders. Performance was assessed at the epoch level for sensitivity and specificity, with agreement analyses for arousal index (ArI) and total sleep time (TST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm achieved sensitivity and specificity of 77.9% and 96.2% for Wake, 93.9% and 80.4% for NREM, 80.5% and 98.2% for REM, and 66.1% and 86.7% for arousals. Bland-Altman analysis showed ArI limits of agreement ranging from - 32 to 24 events/hour (bias: - 4.4) and TST limits from - 47 to 64 min (bias: 8.0). Intraclass correlation was 0.74 for ArI and 0.91 for TST.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The algorithm identifies sleep states and arousals from breathing signals with agreement comparable to established variability in manual scoring. These results highlight its potential to advance HST capabilities, enabling more accessible, cost-effective and reliable sleep diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"29 2","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03325-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Accurately identifying sleep states (REM, NREM, and Wake) and brief awakenings (arousals) is essential for diagnosing sleep disorders. Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for such assessments but is costly and requires overnight monitoring in a lab. Home sleep testing (HST) offers a more accessible alternative, relying primarily on breathing measurements but lacks electroencephalography, limiting its ability to evaluate sleep and arousals directly. This study evaluates a deep learning algorithm which determines sleep states and arousals from breathing signals.

Methods: A novel deep learning algorithm was developed to classify sleep states and detect arousals from respiratory inductance plethysmography signals. Sleep states were predicted for 30-s intervals (one sleep epoch), while arousal probabilities were calculated at 1-s resolution. Validation was conducted on a clinical dataset of 1,299 adults with suspected sleep disorders. Performance was assessed at the epoch level for sensitivity and specificity, with agreement analyses for arousal index (ArI) and total sleep time (TST).

Results: The algorithm achieved sensitivity and specificity of 77.9% and 96.2% for Wake, 93.9% and 80.4% for NREM, 80.5% and 98.2% for REM, and 66.1% and 86.7% for arousals. Bland-Altman analysis showed ArI limits of agreement ranging from - 32 to 24 events/hour (bias: - 4.4) and TST limits from - 47 to 64 min (bias: 8.0). Intraclass correlation was 0.74 for ArI and 0.91 for TST.

Conclusion: The algorithm identifies sleep states and arousals from breathing signals with agreement comparable to established variability in manual scoring. These results highlight its potential to advance HST capabilities, enabling more accessible, cost-effective and reliable sleep diagnostics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用呼吸感应脉搏波检测觉醒和睡眠。
目的:准确识别睡眠状态(快速眼动、非快速眼动和清醒)和短暂觉醒(觉醒)对诊断睡眠障碍至关重要。多导睡眠图(PSG)是此类评估的黄金标准,但价格昂贵,需要在实验室进行夜间监测。家庭睡眠测试(HST)提供了一个更容易获得的替代方案,主要依靠呼吸测量,但缺乏脑电图,限制了其直接评估睡眠和觉醒的能力。这项研究评估了一种深度学习算法,该算法可以从呼吸信号中确定睡眠状态和唤醒。方法:开发了一种新的深度学习算法来分类睡眠状态,并从呼吸感应脉搏波信号中检测唤醒。睡眠状态预测间隔30秒(一个睡眠期),唤醒概率以1秒的分辨率计算。在1299名疑似睡眠障碍的成年人的临床数据集上进行了验证。在epoch水平上评估表现的敏感性和特异性,并对唤醒指数(ArI)和总睡眠时间(TST)进行一致性分析。结果:该算法对Wake的灵敏度和特异度分别为77.9%和96.2%,对NREM的灵敏度和特异度分别为93.9%和80.4%,对REM的灵敏度和特异度分别为80.5%和98.2%,对唤醒的灵敏度和特异度分别为66.1%和86.7%。Bland-Altman分析显示,ArI的一致性范围为- 32至24事件/小时(偏差:- 4.4),TST的一致性范围为- 47至64分钟(偏差:8.0)。ArI和TST的类内相关性分别为0.74和0.91。结论:该算法从呼吸信号中识别睡眠状态和觉醒状态,其一致性与人工评分的可变性相当。这些结果突出了其提高HST能力的潜力,使睡眠诊断更容易获得,更具成本效益和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep and Breathing
Sleep and Breathing 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep. Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信