Health Worker Burnout and Moral Injury: Drivers, Effects, and Remedies.

IF 17.2 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kevin Grumbach, Rachel Willard-Grace
{"title":"Health Worker Burnout and Moral Injury: Drivers, Effects, and Remedies.","authors":"Kevin Grumbach, Rachel Willard-Grace","doi":"10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071823-122832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of burnout among health workers is alarmingly high and worsening. Many factors across the domains of culture of wellness, efficiency of practice and work demands, and personal resilience place workers at risk for burnout. Intervention research has disproportionately studied individually focused interventions to strengthen personal resilience, demonstrating small benefit from such interventions. While coping strategies may have value, we stress the need to focus interventions on mitigating work conditions that breed burnout, such as inadequate levels of staffing, and to rigorously evaluate such interventions. A conceptual framework on burnout must include critical theory interrogating the broader economic, political, and structural forces shaping health care and the relative power of workers. The concept of moral injury may be more apt than burnout for describing the effects on workers' well-being of accelerating health care consolidation by investor-owned organizations, government austerity policies, and the disempowered position of labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":50752,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Public Health","volume":"46 1","pages":"447-465"},"PeriodicalIF":17.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071823-122832","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of burnout among health workers is alarmingly high and worsening. Many factors across the domains of culture of wellness, efficiency of practice and work demands, and personal resilience place workers at risk for burnout. Intervention research has disproportionately studied individually focused interventions to strengthen personal resilience, demonstrating small benefit from such interventions. While coping strategies may have value, we stress the need to focus interventions on mitigating work conditions that breed burnout, such as inadequate levels of staffing, and to rigorously evaluate such interventions. A conceptual framework on burnout must include critical theory interrogating the broader economic, political, and structural forces shaping health care and the relative power of workers. The concept of moral injury may be more apt than burnout for describing the effects on workers' well-being of accelerating health care consolidation by investor-owned organizations, government austerity policies, and the disempowered position of labor.

卫生工作者职业倦怠和道德伤害:驱动因素、影响和补救。
卫生工作者中职业倦怠的发生率高得惊人,而且还在恶化。健康文化、工作效率和工作要求以及个人适应力等领域的许多因素都使员工面临倦怠的风险。干预研究不成比例地研究了以个人为重点的干预措施,以增强个人适应力,表明这种干预措施的好处很小。虽然应对策略可能有价值,但我们强调有必要将干预措施的重点放在减轻导致倦怠的工作条件上,例如人员配备水平不足,并严格评估此类干预措施。倦怠的概念框架必须包括批判性理论,质疑更广泛的经济、政治和结构力量,塑造医疗保健和工人的相对权力。道德伤害的概念可能比倦怠更适合描述投资者拥有的组织加速医疗保健整合、政府紧缩政策和劳工被剥夺权力的地位对工人福祉的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Public Health
Annual Review of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
26.60
自引率
1.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Public Health has been a trusted publication in the field since its inception in 1980. It provides comprehensive coverage of important advancements in various areas of public health, such as epidemiology, biostatistics, environmental health, occupational health, social environment and behavior, health services, as well as public health practice and policy. In an effort to make the valuable research and information more accessible, the current volume has undergone a transformation. Previously, access to the articles was restricted, but now they are available to everyone through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. This open access approach ensures that the knowledge and insights shared in these articles can reach a wider audience. Additionally, all the published articles are licensed under a CC BY license, allowing users to freely use, distribute, and build upon the content, while giving appropriate credit to the original authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书