Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management after Hip Surgery: A Narrative Review.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alan D Kaye, Angela Nguyen, Austin S Thomassen, Allison M Picou, Nicholas L Thomas, Coplen D Johnson, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Yair Lopez Torres, Julian Kim, Sahar Shekoohi
{"title":"Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management after Hip Surgery: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Angela Nguyen, Austin S Thomassen, Allison M Picou, Nicholas L Thomas, Coplen D Johnson, Charles J Fox, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Yair Lopez Torres, Julian Kim, Sahar Shekoohi","doi":"10.1007/s11916-025-01393-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Managing pain after hip surgery can be challenging, especially with the need to balance effective relief and early movement. Traditional pain management methods, such as opioids and nerve blocks, have been demonstrated to be efficacious but come with risks, including side effects, potential for opioid dependency, and the possibility of delays in mobility.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently gained attention as a newer option that may offer unique benefits. ESPB is an ultrasound-guided technique targeting nerves along the spine, providing broad and long-lasting pain relief without significant muscle weakness. This allows patients to start moving sooner, which is critical to recovery. Studies suggest ESPB can reduce opioid use and maintain motor strength better than other approaches, although more research is needed to confirm these findings across larger groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESPB's technique, however, still needs standardization to ensure consistent results, as variations in dosage and application can impact its effectiveness. Further research focusing on larger, controlled studies could better clarify ESPB's role compared to traditional methods, especially regarding long-term recovery and quality of life. As more evidence accumulates, ESPB may become a valuable addition to pain management plans for hip surgery, especially for patients needing effective, low-risk analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-025-01393-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Managing pain after hip surgery can be challenging, especially with the need to balance effective relief and early movement. Traditional pain management methods, such as opioids and nerve blocks, have been demonstrated to be efficacious but come with risks, including side effects, potential for opioid dependency, and the possibility of delays in mobility.

Recent findings: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has recently gained attention as a newer option that may offer unique benefits. ESPB is an ultrasound-guided technique targeting nerves along the spine, providing broad and long-lasting pain relief without significant muscle weakness. This allows patients to start moving sooner, which is critical to recovery. Studies suggest ESPB can reduce opioid use and maintain motor strength better than other approaches, although more research is needed to confirm these findings across larger groups.

Conclusion: ESPB's technique, however, still needs standardization to ensure consistent results, as variations in dosage and application can impact its effectiveness. Further research focusing on larger, controlled studies could better clarify ESPB's role compared to traditional methods, especially regarding long-term recovery and quality of life. As more evidence accumulates, ESPB may become a valuable addition to pain management plans for hip surgery, especially for patients needing effective, low-risk analgesia.

竖脊肌平面阻滞治疗髋关节术后疼痛的疗效:综述。
综述目的:髋部手术后的疼痛管理是具有挑战性的,特别是需要平衡有效的缓解和早期活动。传统的疼痛管理方法,如阿片类药物和神经阻滞,已被证明是有效的,但也有风险,包括副作用、阿片类药物依赖的可能性以及行动迟缓的可能性。最近的发现:直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)作为一种新的选择可能提供独特的好处,最近引起了人们的注意。ESPB是一种超声引导技术,针对脊柱神经,提供广泛和持久的疼痛缓解,没有明显的肌肉无力。这可以让患者更快地开始活动,这对康复至关重要。研究表明,ESPB可以减少阿片类药物的使用,并比其他方法更好地保持运动力量,尽管需要更多的研究来证实这些发现在更大的群体中。结论:ESPB的技术仍需要标准化以确保结果的一致性,因为剂量和应用的变化会影响其效果。与传统方法相比,更大规模的对照研究可以更好地阐明ESPB的作用,特别是在长期恢复和生活质量方面。随着越来越多的证据积累,ESPB可能成为髋关节手术疼痛管理计划的一个有价值的补充,特别是对于需要有效、低风险镇痛的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信