Gender and body height discriminate spinal movement patterns during lifting and lowering tasks.

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Mehdi Nematimoez, Christian Bangerter, Michael Von Arx, Melanie Liechti, Stefan Schmid
{"title":"Gender and body height discriminate spinal movement patterns during lifting and lowering tasks.","authors":"Mehdi Nematimoez, Christian Bangerter, Michael Von Arx, Melanie Liechti, Stefan Schmid","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2496950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the relationships between gender, anthropometrics, and spinal movement patterns (SMP) during lifting and lowering tasks. Thirty adults lifted and lowered a 15 kg-box using a freestyle, squat, and stoop technique. A stepwise segmentation approach, along with the timing of main inflection points of relative angles, was used to distinguish various spinal movement patterns. Temporal multi-segmental interactions were categorised, and their frequencies were analysed based on segments and lifting techniques. SMP's demonstrated varying associations with gender and anthropometric factors during lifting and lowering phases. Notably, during stoop lifting, females tended towards a bottom-up pattern, contrasting with males' preference for a simultaneous pattern. Cluster analysis highlighted the bottom-up pattern in the thoracic spine as the most prominent discriminating factor among females. This SMP categorisation method holds potential for designing tailored manual material handling strategies and re-evaluating therapeutic and exercise programs in occupational, clinical, and sport contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2496950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the relationships between gender, anthropometrics, and spinal movement patterns (SMP) during lifting and lowering tasks. Thirty adults lifted and lowered a 15 kg-box using a freestyle, squat, and stoop technique. A stepwise segmentation approach, along with the timing of main inflection points of relative angles, was used to distinguish various spinal movement patterns. Temporal multi-segmental interactions were categorised, and their frequencies were analysed based on segments and lifting techniques. SMP's demonstrated varying associations with gender and anthropometric factors during lifting and lowering phases. Notably, during stoop lifting, females tended towards a bottom-up pattern, contrasting with males' preference for a simultaneous pattern. Cluster analysis highlighted the bottom-up pattern in the thoracic spine as the most prominent discriminating factor among females. This SMP categorisation method holds potential for designing tailored manual material handling strategies and re-evaluating therapeutic and exercise programs in occupational, clinical, and sport contexts.

性别和身高在抬举和降低任务中区分脊柱运动模式。
本研究旨在探讨性别、人体测量学和脊柱运动模式(SMP)在升降任务中的关系。30个成年人用自由式、深蹲和弯腰技术举起和放下一个15公斤的箱子。一种逐步分割的方法,以及相对角度的主要拐点的时间,被用来区分各种脊柱运动模式。对时间多段相互作用进行了分类,并基于段和提升技术对其频率进行了分析。在抬起和放下阶段,SMP与性别和人体测量因素有不同的关联。值得注意的是,在俯身举重过程中,女性倾向于自下而上的模式,而男性则倾向于同时的模式。聚类分析显示,胸椎自下而上的模式是女性中最显著的区分因素。这种SMP分类方法具有设计量身定制的手动材料处理策略和重新评估职业、临床和运动环境中的治疗和锻炼计划的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信