Mehdi Nematimoez, Christian Bangerter, Michael Von Arx, Melanie Liechti, Stefan Schmid
{"title":"Gender and body height discriminate spinal movement patterns during lifting and lowering tasks.","authors":"Mehdi Nematimoez, Christian Bangerter, Michael Von Arx, Melanie Liechti, Stefan Schmid","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2496950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the relationships between gender, anthropometrics, and spinal movement patterns (SMP) during lifting and lowering tasks. Thirty adults lifted and lowered a 15 kg-box using a freestyle, squat, and stoop technique. A stepwise segmentation approach, along with the timing of main inflection points of relative angles, was used to distinguish various spinal movement patterns. Temporal multi-segmental interactions were categorised, and their frequencies were analysed based on segments and lifting techniques. SMP's demonstrated varying associations with gender and anthropometric factors during lifting and lowering phases. Notably, during stoop lifting, females tended towards a bottom-up pattern, contrasting with males' preference for a simultaneous pattern. Cluster analysis highlighted the bottom-up pattern in the thoracic spine as the most prominent discriminating factor among females. This SMP categorisation method holds potential for designing tailored manual material handling strategies and re-evaluating therapeutic and exercise programs in occupational, clinical, and sport contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2496950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the relationships between gender, anthropometrics, and spinal movement patterns (SMP) during lifting and lowering tasks. Thirty adults lifted and lowered a 15 kg-box using a freestyle, squat, and stoop technique. A stepwise segmentation approach, along with the timing of main inflection points of relative angles, was used to distinguish various spinal movement patterns. Temporal multi-segmental interactions were categorised, and their frequencies were analysed based on segments and lifting techniques. SMP's demonstrated varying associations with gender and anthropometric factors during lifting and lowering phases. Notably, during stoop lifting, females tended towards a bottom-up pattern, contrasting with males' preference for a simultaneous pattern. Cluster analysis highlighted the bottom-up pattern in the thoracic spine as the most prominent discriminating factor among females. This SMP categorisation method holds potential for designing tailored manual material handling strategies and re-evaluating therapeutic and exercise programs in occupational, clinical, and sport contexts.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.