The Shock Effect: How U.S. Global Health Policy Shifts Reshape Health Systems and Research.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Wesam Mansour, David Bishai, Irene Torres, Shehla Zaidi, Valéry Ridde, Tiago Correia
{"title":"The Shock Effect: How U.S. Global Health Policy Shifts Reshape Health Systems and Research.","authors":"Wesam Mansour, David Bishai, Irene Torres, Shehla Zaidi, Valéry Ridde, Tiago Correia","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States (U.S.) has long played a central role in shaping global health governance, supporting United Nations agencies and funding vital programs and initiatives. However, recent political shifts, including, funding cuts, changing geopolitical priorities and a retreat from multilateralism, are threatening the stability of global health systems and research. This editorial examines the cascading consequences of these shifts, particularly for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The U.S. withdrawal is not just a budgetary adjustment, but a significant political disruption with unforeseen effects on global inequities. It also redirects research priorities towards security-driven agendas and undermines capacity-building efforts in LMICs. As the U.S. steps back, new actors will try to fill the vacuum, but the direction of this transition remains uncertain. Whether it paves the way for a more decentralised and equitable global health research ecosystem will depend on how global health stakeholders respond. Crucially, LMICs must seize this moment not only to replace lost funding, but to assert greater autonomy, reimagine health systems financing and build more sustainable, locally led models of research and policy leadership. This editorial calls for urgent diversification of funding sources, strengthened South-South collaborations and increased autonomy for LMICs in setting their own research priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States (U.S.) has long played a central role in shaping global health governance, supporting United Nations agencies and funding vital programs and initiatives. However, recent political shifts, including, funding cuts, changing geopolitical priorities and a retreat from multilateralism, are threatening the stability of global health systems and research. This editorial examines the cascading consequences of these shifts, particularly for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The U.S. withdrawal is not just a budgetary adjustment, but a significant political disruption with unforeseen effects on global inequities. It also redirects research priorities towards security-driven agendas and undermines capacity-building efforts in LMICs. As the U.S. steps back, new actors will try to fill the vacuum, but the direction of this transition remains uncertain. Whether it paves the way for a more decentralised and equitable global health research ecosystem will depend on how global health stakeholders respond. Crucially, LMICs must seize this moment not only to replace lost funding, but to assert greater autonomy, reimagine health systems financing and build more sustainable, locally led models of research and policy leadership. This editorial calls for urgent diversification of funding sources, strengthened South-South collaborations and increased autonomy for LMICs in setting their own research priorities.

冲击效应:美国全球卫生政策的转变如何重塑卫生系统和研究。
长期以来,美国在塑造全球卫生治理、支持联合国机构和资助重要方案和倡议方面发挥了核心作用。然而,最近的政治变化,包括经费削减、地缘政治优先事项的变化和多边主义的退却,正在威胁全球卫生系统和研究的稳定。这篇社论探讨了这些转变的连锁后果,特别是对低收入和中等收入国家的连锁后果。美国的撤军不仅是预算调整,也是对全球不平等产生不可预见影响的重大政治破坏。它还将研究重点转向安全驱动的议程,破坏了中低收入国家的能力建设努力。随着美国的退出,新的参与者将试图填补真空,但这种过渡的方向仍然不确定。它是否为一个更加分散和公平的全球卫生研究生态系统铺平了道路,将取决于全球卫生利益攸关方如何应对。至关重要的是,中低收入国家必须抓住这一时机,不仅要弥补失去的资金,而且要主张更大的自主权,重新构想卫生系统融资,并建立更可持续的、地方主导的研究和政策领导模式。这篇社论呼吁紧急实现资金来源多样化、加强南南合作以及增加中低收入国家在确定自己的研究重点方面的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信