Custom-made foot orthoses with and without heel plugs and their effect on treatment outcomes and plantar pressures in patients with plantar fasciitis: A crossover study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Megan E R Balsdon, Colin E Dombroski
{"title":"Custom-made foot orthoses with and without heel plugs and their effect on treatment outcomes and plantar pressures in patients with plantar fasciitis: A crossover study.","authors":"Megan E R Balsdon, Colin E Dombroski","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plantar fasciitis (PF) is considered to be the most common cause of plantar heel pain in adults. Various types of foot orthoses (FOs) have been used to treat plantar heel pain, between flat ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) devices, to prefabricated orthoses, to completely custom FOs. The objective of this crossover study was to quantify both objective plantar pressures, and subjective foot function and comfort ratings for two custom foot orthoses (CFOs), one with a heel plug (HP) and one without.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients with diagnosed PF participated in this study and were casted using a semi-weight-bearing foam box cast. Both CFOs were made with the same materials and specifications, but the HP orthosis had a softer blue PORON® plug under the heel for added cushioning. The foot function index (FFI) was given at weeks 0, 4, and 8, as well as a subjective comfort rating at 4 and 8 weeks. Plantar pressures were recorded during treadmill walking for both devices in a running shoe after 8 weeks, after having worn each pair for 4 weeks. Average pressure, peak pressure, and pressure contact area were determined for 3 regions of the foot: hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. A paired samples t test determined differences in each region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average pressure, peak pressure, and pressure contact area were significantly reduced at the hindfoot in the HP orthosis (P < 0.001), and peak pressure was significantly reduced at the midfoot with the HP orthosis (P < 0.05). Total FFI scores were significantly reduced with both orthosis types compared to baseline (P < 0.01), but there was no difference in FFI scores or comfort scores between CFO conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFOs with heel plugs are more effective at reducing plantar pressure at the heel in patients with PF compared to CFOs without heel plugs. Both CFOs were effective at reducing FFI scores, showing an improvement in pain, and an increase in function and activity after both 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is considered to be the most common cause of plantar heel pain in adults. Various types of foot orthoses (FOs) have been used to treat plantar heel pain, between flat ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) devices, to prefabricated orthoses, to completely custom FOs. The objective of this crossover study was to quantify both objective plantar pressures, and subjective foot function and comfort ratings for two custom foot orthoses (CFOs), one with a heel plug (HP) and one without.

Methods: Twenty-one patients with diagnosed PF participated in this study and were casted using a semi-weight-bearing foam box cast. Both CFOs were made with the same materials and specifications, but the HP orthosis had a softer blue PORON® plug under the heel for added cushioning. The foot function index (FFI) was given at weeks 0, 4, and 8, as well as a subjective comfort rating at 4 and 8 weeks. Plantar pressures were recorded during treadmill walking for both devices in a running shoe after 8 weeks, after having worn each pair for 4 weeks. Average pressure, peak pressure, and pressure contact area were determined for 3 regions of the foot: hindfoot, midfoot, and forefoot. A paired samples t test determined differences in each region.

Results: Average pressure, peak pressure, and pressure contact area were significantly reduced at the hindfoot in the HP orthosis (P < 0.001), and peak pressure was significantly reduced at the midfoot with the HP orthosis (P < 0.05). Total FFI scores were significantly reduced with both orthosis types compared to baseline (P < 0.01), but there was no difference in FFI scores or comfort scores between CFO conditions.

Conclusions: CFOs with heel plugs are more effective at reducing plantar pressure at the heel in patients with PF compared to CFOs without heel plugs. Both CFOs were effective at reducing FFI scores, showing an improvement in pain, and an increase in function and activity after both 4 and 8 weeks of treatment.

定制足部矫形器带和不带足跟塞及其对足底筋膜炎患者治疗结果和足底压力的影响:一项交叉研究
背景:足底筋膜炎(PF)被认为是成人足底跟痛的最常见原因。各种类型的足部矫形器(FOs)已被用于治疗足底跟痛,从扁平的乙烯-醋酸乙烯酯(EVA)装置到预制矫形器,再到完全定制的FOs。本交叉研究的目的是量化两种定制足部矫形器(cfo)的客观足底压力、主观足功能和舒适度评分,其中一种有跟塞(HP),另一种没有跟塞(HP)。方法:21例诊断为PF的患者采用半负重泡沫盒型铸造。两款cfo都采用相同的材料和规格,但HP矫形器在鞋跟下有一个更柔软的蓝色PORON®插头,以增加缓冲。在第0周、第4周和第8周给出足部功能指数(FFI),并在第4周和第8周给出主观舒适度评分。每双鞋穿4周后,8周后记录两种设备在跑步机上行走时的足底压力。测定足部3个区域的平均压力、峰值压力和压力接触面积:后脚、中脚和前脚。配对样本t检验确定了每个地区的差异。结果:HP矫形器显著降低了后足的平均压力、峰值压力和压力接触面积(P < 0.001),显著降低了中足的峰值压力(P < 0.05)。与基线相比,两种矫形器类型的FFI总分均显著降低(P < 0.01),但FFI评分或舒适度评分在CFO条件下无差异。结论:与不带足跟塞的cfo相比,带足跟塞的cfo在降低PF患者足跟压力方面更有效。在治疗4周和8周后,两种cfo均有效降低FFI评分,显示疼痛改善,功能和活动增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信