Optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in amblyopia.

IF 0.8 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Adonis Chedid, Maria Fronius, Yaroslava Wenner, Licia Cirina, Thomas Kohnen, Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach
{"title":"Optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in amblyopia.","authors":"Adonis Chedid, Maria Fronius, Yaroslava Wenner, Licia Cirina, Thomas Kohnen, Claudia Kuhli-Hattenbach","doi":"10.1080/09273972.2025.2478078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Publications on optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in amblyopic eyes compared to fellow eyes are discordant. Our study not only compares OCT data of fellow and amblyopic eyes, but is the first study to deliver pilot results on OCT parameter changes after long-term electronic monitoring of occlusion therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty eyes with strabismic, anisometropic or mixed amblyopia and the corresponding fellow eyes underwent OCT of the macula and optic disc with a Topcon 3D-OCT-2000. In a subgroup of six patients, the same examinations were additionally performed at the end of long-term objectively measured occlusion therapy with Occlusion-Dose-Monitoring (ODM) of ≥2135 hours. Paired t-tests or matched pairs Wilcoxon tests were performed to compare optic disc values, macular thickness, as well as thickness of different layers of the macula of the amblyopic eye versus the fellow eye. Specifically, the Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL) with the Inner Plexiform Layer (IPL) designated as GCL+, as well as combined with the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) designated as GCL++, were analyzed. For the subgroup of patients with follow-up OCT, the same tests were performed to compare the values in both eyes before and after occlusion therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average thickness (AT) and total volume (TV) of the macula of amblyopic eyes (282.0 ± 13.0 µm; 7.98 mm<sup>3</sup> ±0.37) were increased (marginally significant p<i>=</i>0.0495 for both) compared to fellow eyes (278.6 µm ± 13.3; 7.88 mm<sup>3</sup> ±0.37), all other parameters did not differ. In the group with follow-up OCT, the AT and TV of the amblyopic eyes significantly decreased after occlusion (278.8 µm before vs. 268.3 µm after and 7.89 mm<sup>3</sup> before vs. 7.59 mm<sup>3</sup> after; <i>p</i> = .031 for both). The thicknesses of inner retinal layers were not significantly different between amblyopic and fellow eyes or after therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that the macula of amblyopic eyes may be thicker than in fellow eyes, particularly in eyes with moderate-to-severe amblyopia. Occlusion therapy may lead to a thinning of the macula in the amblyopic eye or both eyes. The layers included in GCL+ and GCL++ do not seem to be the substrate of the observed structural changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51700,"journal":{"name":"Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273972.2025.2478078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Publications on optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters in amblyopic eyes compared to fellow eyes are discordant. Our study not only compares OCT data of fellow and amblyopic eyes, but is the first study to deliver pilot results on OCT parameter changes after long-term electronic monitoring of occlusion therapy.

Methods: Thirty eyes with strabismic, anisometropic or mixed amblyopia and the corresponding fellow eyes underwent OCT of the macula and optic disc with a Topcon 3D-OCT-2000. In a subgroup of six patients, the same examinations were additionally performed at the end of long-term objectively measured occlusion therapy with Occlusion-Dose-Monitoring (ODM) of ≥2135 hours. Paired t-tests or matched pairs Wilcoxon tests were performed to compare optic disc values, macular thickness, as well as thickness of different layers of the macula of the amblyopic eye versus the fellow eye. Specifically, the Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL) with the Inner Plexiform Layer (IPL) designated as GCL+, as well as combined with the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL) designated as GCL++, were analyzed. For the subgroup of patients with follow-up OCT, the same tests were performed to compare the values in both eyes before and after occlusion therapy.

Results: Average thickness (AT) and total volume (TV) of the macula of amblyopic eyes (282.0 ± 13.0 µm; 7.98 mm3 ±0.37) were increased (marginally significant p=0.0495 for both) compared to fellow eyes (278.6 µm ± 13.3; 7.88 mm3 ±0.37), all other parameters did not differ. In the group with follow-up OCT, the AT and TV of the amblyopic eyes significantly decreased after occlusion (278.8 µm before vs. 268.3 µm after and 7.89 mm3 before vs. 7.59 mm3 after; p = .031 for both). The thicknesses of inner retinal layers were not significantly different between amblyopic and fellow eyes or after therapy.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the macula of amblyopic eyes may be thicker than in fellow eyes, particularly in eyes with moderate-to-severe amblyopia. Occlusion therapy may lead to a thinning of the macula in the amblyopic eye or both eyes. The layers included in GCL+ and GCL++ do not seem to be the substrate of the observed structural changes.

弱视的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数。
背景:关于弱视眼的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)参数与其他眼比较的出版物是不一致的。我们的研究不仅比较了普通眼和弱视眼的OCT数据,而且是第一个提供长期电子监测闭塞治疗后OCT参数变化的试点研究。方法:采用Topcon 3D-OCT-2000对30只斜视、屈光参差或混合性弱视及相应的眼行黄斑视盘OCT检查。在6名患者的亚组中,在长期客观测量闭塞治疗结束时进行相同的检查,闭塞剂量监测(ODM)≥2135小时。进行配对t检验或配对Wilcoxon检验,比较视盘值、黄斑厚度以及弱视眼与正常眼黄斑不同层的厚度。具体来说,我们分析了神经节细胞层(GCL)与内丛状层(IPL)分别被称为GCL+,以及与视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)联合被称为GCL++。对于随访OCT的亚组患者,进行相同的测试以比较闭塞治疗前后双眼的值。结果:弱视眼黄斑平均厚度(AT)和总体积(TV)为282.0±13.0µm;7.98 mm3±0.37)与其他眼(278.6µm±13.3;7.88 mm3±0.37),其他参数无差异。在随访OCT组中,遮挡后弱视眼AT和TV明显降低(遮挡前278.8µm vs遮挡后268.3µm,遮挡前7.89 mm3 vs遮挡后7.59 mm3);p =。两者都是031)。弱视与正常眼及治疗后视网膜内层厚度无显著差异。结论:弱视的黄斑可能比正常眼更厚,特别是中重度弱视。遮挡治疗可导致弱视眼或双眼黄斑变薄。GCL+和GCL+中包含的层似乎不是观察到的结构变化的基底。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strabismus
Strabismus OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信