Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Adherence to Oral Drug Therapy in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Paulius Sėdžius, Dalia Musneckienė
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Adherence to Oral Drug Therapy in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Paulius Sėdžius, Dalia Musneckienė","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives:</i> Selecting appropriate disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is crucial for optimizing treatment and slowing disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). Real-world studies assess drug efficacy and usage in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral drug therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and the particularities of adherence to the therapy. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Neurology Clinic of the Kaunas Clinics of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. The medical records of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were reviewed. The retrospective study included 286 patients, and the prospective study included 175 patients. <i>Results:</i> The study population included 131 patients on teriflunomide (TFN), 53 on dimethyl fumarate (DMF), 37 on fingolimod (FTY), and 65 on cladribine (CLAD). The overall absolute reduction in the ARR over 4 years of treatment was higher in the second-line (FTY and CLAD) group (-2.00) compared with the first-line (-0.99) group (TFN and DMF). The total EDSS scores of patients who received FTY and CLAD were higher in the second (3.09, <i>p</i> = 0.024), third (3.94, <i>p</i> = 0.015), and fourth (3.6, <i>p</i> = 0.002) years of treatment, compared with the patients of first-line therapy. MRI revealed that the number of contrast-enhancing and new lesions was lower among patients taking second-line drugs in the second year (4.7% and 18.6%, respectively). The worst adherence to the drug therapy due to forgetfulness was observed in the DMF group (30.8%). Lymphopenia was less frequent in the TFN group (93.1%) and more frequent in the FTY group (86.5%) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions:</i> Over four years, second-line patients had greater ARR reduction, fewer MRI lesions, and higher EDSS from year two. DMF showed the lowest adherence, mainly due to patient forgetfulness, while lymphopenia occurred most frequently with FTY.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Selecting appropriate disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is crucial for optimizing treatment and slowing disease progression in multiple sclerosis (MS). Real-world studies assess drug efficacy and usage in routine clinical practice. Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral drug therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and the particularities of adherence to the therapy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Neurology Clinic of the Kaunas Clinics of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. The medical records of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) were reviewed. The retrospective study included 286 patients, and the prospective study included 175 patients. Results: The study population included 131 patients on teriflunomide (TFN), 53 on dimethyl fumarate (DMF), 37 on fingolimod (FTY), and 65 on cladribine (CLAD). The overall absolute reduction in the ARR over 4 years of treatment was higher in the second-line (FTY and CLAD) group (-2.00) compared with the first-line (-0.99) group (TFN and DMF). The total EDSS scores of patients who received FTY and CLAD were higher in the second (3.09, p = 0.024), third (3.94, p = 0.015), and fourth (3.6, p = 0.002) years of treatment, compared with the patients of first-line therapy. MRI revealed that the number of contrast-enhancing and new lesions was lower among patients taking second-line drugs in the second year (4.7% and 18.6%, respectively). The worst adherence to the drug therapy due to forgetfulness was observed in the DMF group (30.8%). Lymphopenia was less frequent in the TFN group (93.1%) and more frequent in the FTY group (86.5%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Over four years, second-line patients had greater ARR reduction, fewer MRI lesions, and higher EDSS from year two. DMF showed the lowest adherence, mainly due to patient forgetfulness, while lymphopenia occurred most frequently with FTY.

评估复发-缓解型多发性硬化症患者口服药物治疗的有效性、安全性和依从性。
背景和目的:选择合适的疾病修饰药物(dmd)对于优化治疗和减缓多发性硬化症(MS)的疾病进展至关重要。真实世界的研究评估药物在常规临床实践中的疗效和使用情况。因此,本研究的目的是确定口服药物治疗复发-缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疗效和安全性,以及依从性治疗的特殊性。材料和方法:在立陶宛健康科学大学考纳斯诊所神经病学诊所进行了一项回顾性和前瞻性研究。回顾了复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者的医疗记录。回顾性研究纳入286例患者,前瞻性研究纳入175例患者。结果:研究人群包括使用特立氟米特(TFN)的患者131例,使用富马酸二甲酯(DMF)的患者53例,使用芬戈莫德(FTY)的患者37例,使用克拉德里滨(CLAD)的患者65例。与一线治疗组(TFN和DMF)相比,二线治疗组(-0.99)在4年治疗期间ARR的总体绝对降低(-2.00)更高。与一线治疗组相比,治疗2年(3.09,p = 0.024)、3年(3.94,p = 0.015)和4年(3.6,p = 0.002)时,接受FTY和CLAD治疗组的EDSS总评分较高。MRI显示,服用二线药物的患者第二年的对比增强和新发病变数量较低(分别为4.7%和18.6%)。DMF组因健忘对药物治疗的依从性最差(30.8%)。淋巴细胞减少症在TFN组发生率较低(93.1%),而在FTY组发生率较高(86.5%)(p < 0.001)。结论:在四年多的时间里,二线患者的ARR降低幅度更大,MRI病变更少,从第二年开始,EDSS更高。DMF表现出最低的依从性,主要是由于患者健忘,而淋巴细胞减少最常见于FTY。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信