Patients' and Physicians' Experience With and Acceptability of a Telemedicine Cabin: Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.2196/55430
Caroline Villela Galvão de França, Paola Boaro Segalla, Felipe Sebastião de Assis Reis, José Ricardo Silveira Pereira, Alexandre Oliveira de Mattos, Roberta de Moura Ferron, Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira, Jéssica Bassani Borges, Lilian Quintal Hoffmann, Edmundo Di Giaimo Caboclo
{"title":"Patients' and Physicians' Experience With and Acceptability of a Telemedicine Cabin: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Caroline Villela Galvão de França, Paola Boaro Segalla, Felipe Sebastião de Assis Reis, José Ricardo Silveira Pereira, Alexandre Oliveira de Mattos, Roberta de Moura Ferron, Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira, Jéssica Bassani Borges, Lilian Quintal Hoffmann, Edmundo Di Giaimo Caboclo","doi":"10.2196/55430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine represents an essential tool with the potential to reduce health costs, thus avoiding patient displacement and improving patient care outcomes, positioning it as a significant social technology.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to analyze the implementation of a telehealth cabin at BP Hospital (A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo), focusing on the evaluation of the experiences of both patients and health care professionals, as well as the acceptability of this tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods study was conducted with 229 participants, divided into 2 phases. The first phase involved 40 apparently healthy individuals to assess the usability, experience, and satisfaction of this group for the later safe application in the group with clinical complaints. The second phase included 189 participants, with complaints to assess the usability, experience, and satisfaction of patients and doctors. In both phases, participants completed screening questionnaires (to assess the eligibility criteria), a socioeconomic demographic questionnaire before using the cabin, and a questionnaire including the System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score (NPS) after using the cabin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data analysis of the first phase showed high acceptance of the telehealth cabin, which supported the progression to the second phase. In the second phase, a high usability score was observed among participants with clinical complaints (mean System Usability Scale score of 85.97, SD 15.50) and a high favorability rating (NPS score of 9.4). Health care professionals also reported favorable results, with a usability score of 67.8 and an NPS of 8.0.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study reinforce the potential for scaling up this practice based on usability outcomes, and highlight its relevance for the development of public policies aimed at expanding access to quality health care in Brazil. This approach improves the interaction of patients with the health care system, while providing professionals with an extended view of clinical conditions through integrated devices, particularly in areas with limited access to medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"12 ","pages":"e55430"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine represents an essential tool with the potential to reduce health costs, thus avoiding patient displacement and improving patient care outcomes, positioning it as a significant social technology.

Objective: This study aims to analyze the implementation of a telehealth cabin at BP Hospital (A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo), focusing on the evaluation of the experiences of both patients and health care professionals, as well as the acceptability of this tool.

Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted with 229 participants, divided into 2 phases. The first phase involved 40 apparently healthy individuals to assess the usability, experience, and satisfaction of this group for the later safe application in the group with clinical complaints. The second phase included 189 participants, with complaints to assess the usability, experience, and satisfaction of patients and doctors. In both phases, participants completed screening questionnaires (to assess the eligibility criteria), a socioeconomic demographic questionnaire before using the cabin, and a questionnaire including the System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score (NPS) after using the cabin.

Results: The data analysis of the first phase showed high acceptance of the telehealth cabin, which supported the progression to the second phase. In the second phase, a high usability score was observed among participants with clinical complaints (mean System Usability Scale score of 85.97, SD 15.50) and a high favorability rating (NPS score of 9.4). Health care professionals also reported favorable results, with a usability score of 67.8 and an NPS of 8.0.

Conclusions: The results of this study reinforce the potential for scaling up this practice based on usability outcomes, and highlight its relevance for the development of public policies aimed at expanding access to quality health care in Brazil. This approach improves the interaction of patients with the health care system, while providing professionals with an extended view of clinical conditions through integrated devices, particularly in areas with limited access to medical care.

病人和医生对远程医疗舱的经验和可接受性:混合方法研究。
背景:远程医疗是一种重要的工具,有可能降低医疗成本,从而避免患者流离失所,改善患者护理结果,将其定位为一项重要的社会技术。目的:本研究旨在分析BP医院(a Beneficência portuesa de s o Paulo)远程医疗舱的实施情况,重点评估患者和卫生保健专业人员的体验,以及该工具的可接受性。方法:采用混合方法对229名被试进行研究,分为2个阶段。第一阶段涉及40名明显健康的个体,以评估该组的可用性,体验和满意度,以便在临床投诉组中稍后安全应用。第二阶段包括189名参与者,通过投诉来评估可用性、体验以及患者和医生的满意度。在这两个阶段,参与者完成了筛选问卷(以评估资格标准),在使用客舱之前完成了社会经济人口调查问卷,在使用客舱后完成了包括系统可用性量表和净推荐值(NPS)在内的调查问卷。结果:第一阶段的数据分析显示,远程医疗舱的接受度较高,为第二阶段的进展提供了支持。在第二阶段,有临床抱怨的参与者的可用性得分较高(系统可用性量表平均得分85.97,标准差15.50),好感度评分较高(NPS得分9.4)。卫生保健专业人员也报告了良好的结果,可用性得分为67.8,NPS为8.0。结论:本研究的结果加强了根据可用性结果扩大这一做法的潜力,并强调了其与制定旨在扩大巴西获得高质量医疗保健的公共政策的相关性。这种方法改善了患者与卫生保健系统的互动,同时通过集成设备为专业人员提供了临床状况的扩展视图,特别是在医疗保健有限的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信