Inequities and factors associated with gender and disability in NTD-endemic communities in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire: an intersectional approach to interventions.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1575082
Ginette Victoire Senami Gandigbe, Zinsou Franck Mignanwande, Yévèdo Borel Tossou, Karine Lucrèce Marie Codjo-Seignon, Sonagnon Inès Elvire Agbo, Fifamin Noël Christelle Gbaguidi, Sèdjro Gimatal Esaï Anagonou, Fernand Aimé Guedou, Mark Nichter, Cristina Juan Jimenez, Roch Christian Johnson, Anna Gine-March
{"title":"Inequities and factors associated with gender and disability in NTD-endemic communities in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire: an intersectional approach to interventions.","authors":"Ginette Victoire Senami Gandigbe, Zinsou Franck Mignanwande, Yévèdo Borel Tossou, Karine Lucrèce Marie Codjo-Seignon, Sonagnon Inès Elvire Agbo, Fifamin Noël Christelle Gbaguidi, Sèdjro Gimatal Esaï Anagonou, Fernand Aimé Guedou, Mark Nichter, Cristina Juan Jimenez, Roch Christian Johnson, Anna Gine-March","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1575082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gender inequity among people with disabilities (PWD) is a complex issue influenced by a combination of socioeconomic, cultural, political, and institutional factors. Women with disabilities often experience double discrimination, increasing their vulnerability. These exacerbate their already difficult health and living conditions. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with gender inequities among PWD in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire, and to design and implement tailored interventions to address these inequities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This intervention-oriented operational research, employing a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative), targeted 841 PWD and 90 community members. Initially, records from various centers managing Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in the study areas were reviewed. All PWD listed in the registers and residing in the community, as well as other community members, were included. Data on socio-demographic and socioeconomic and clinical factors were collected using an interview guide and an observation grid. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (alpha = 5%), while qualitative data were processed through triangulation, categorized, cross-tabulated, and synthesized by theme, hypothesis, and indicator. A subset of PWD facing barriers to accessing education, training, income-generating activities, or healthcare was selected for intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 38 years (IQR = 22-52). Among the 841 PWD, 497 were men and 344 were women (sex ratio = 1.45). Univariate analysis revealed significant associations (<i>p</i> = 0.000) between gender disparities and marital status, monthly income, education level and occupation type. Multivariable analysis identified three factors strongly associated with gender disparities (<i>p</i> = 0.000): marital status, monthly income, and profession. Interventions were designed to address these factors and included vocational training, medical care, and educational or professional scholarships. These measures collectively improved the living conditions of PWD and helped raise awareness among those in their immediate environment, fostering social integration and reducing self-stigmatization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a deeper understanding of the inequalities that PWDs face in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire. It highlights the need to adopt intersectional approaches in policies and practices to effectively address the multiple forms of discrimination faced by women and girls with disabilities, promoting their inclusion and protection in all areas of society.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1575082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1575082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gender inequity among people with disabilities (PWD) is a complex issue influenced by a combination of socioeconomic, cultural, political, and institutional factors. Women with disabilities often experience double discrimination, increasing their vulnerability. These exacerbate their already difficult health and living conditions. This study aimed to explore the factors associated with gender inequities among PWD in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire, and to design and implement tailored interventions to address these inequities.

Method: This intervention-oriented operational research, employing a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative), targeted 841 PWD and 90 community members. Initially, records from various centers managing Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in the study areas were reviewed. All PWD listed in the registers and residing in the community, as well as other community members, were included. Data on socio-demographic and socioeconomic and clinical factors were collected using an interview guide and an observation grid. Quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 (alpha = 5%), while qualitative data were processed through triangulation, categorized, cross-tabulated, and synthesized by theme, hypothesis, and indicator. A subset of PWD facing barriers to accessing education, training, income-generating activities, or healthcare was selected for intervention.

Results: The median age was 38 years (IQR = 22-52). Among the 841 PWD, 497 were men and 344 were women (sex ratio = 1.45). Univariate analysis revealed significant associations (p = 0.000) between gender disparities and marital status, monthly income, education level and occupation type. Multivariable analysis identified three factors strongly associated with gender disparities (p = 0.000): marital status, monthly income, and profession. Interventions were designed to address these factors and included vocational training, medical care, and educational or professional scholarships. These measures collectively improved the living conditions of PWD and helped raise awareness among those in their immediate environment, fostering social integration and reducing self-stigmatization.

Conclusion: This study provides a deeper understanding of the inequalities that PWDs face in Benin and Côte d'Ivoire. It highlights the need to adopt intersectional approaches in policies and practices to effectively address the multiple forms of discrimination faced by women and girls with disabilities, promoting their inclusion and protection in all areas of society.

贝宁和Côte科特迪瓦热带病流行社区中与性别和残疾相关的不平等和因素:干预措施的交叉方法。
残疾人性别不平等是一个复杂的问题,受到社会经济、文化、政治和制度等因素的综合影响。残疾妇女往往遭受双重歧视,使她们更加脆弱。这使他们本已困难的健康和生活条件更加恶化。本研究旨在探讨贝宁和Côte科特迪瓦残疾人性别不平等的相关因素,并设计和实施有针对性的干预措施来解决这些不平等问题。方法:采用定量与定性相结合的方法,以841名残疾人和90名社区成员为研究对象,开展以干预为导向的运筹学研究。首先,对研究地区管理被忽视热带病(NTDs)的各个中心的记录进行了审查。所有登记在社区内的残疾人士,以及其他社区成员,均包括在内。使用访谈指南和观察网格收集社会人口、社会经济和临床因素的数据。定量资料采用SPSS 25版(alpha = 5%)进行分析,定性资料采用三角剖分、分类、交叉制表、主题、假设、指标综合等方法进行处理。选择在获得教育、培训、创收活动或医疗保健方面面临障碍的残疾人子集进行干预。结果:中位年龄38岁(IQR = 22-52)。在841名残疾人士中,男性497名,女性344名(性别比率为1.45)。单因素分析显示,性别差异与婚姻状况、月收入、教育程度和职业类型有显著相关(p = 0.000)。多变量分析确定了与性别差异密切相关的三个因素(p = 0.000):婚姻状况、月收入和职业。干预措施旨在解决这些因素,包括职业培训、医疗保健以及教育或专业奖学金。这些措施共同改善了残疾人士的生活条件,并帮助他们提高对周围环境的认识,促进社会融合,减少自我污名化。结论:本研究对贝宁和Côte科特迪瓦的残疾人面临的不平等问题提供了更深入的了解。报告强调需要在政策和做法方面采取交叉方法,有效解决残疾妇女和女童面临的多种形式歧视问题,促进她们在社会所有领域得到包容和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信