Use of Quadruple Therapy in the Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Khalid A Alnemer
{"title":"Use of Quadruple Therapy in the Management of Hypertension: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Khalid A Alnemer","doi":"10.3390/medicina61040764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and objectives</i>: Hypertension remains a leading global cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control despite available treatments. Monotherapy often fails to achieve target BP, necessitating combination therapies. Quadruple low-dose combination therapy (quadpill) has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance efficacy while minimizing side effects. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of quadpill therapy compared to standard monotherapy and dual therapy. <i>Methods</i>: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception till January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating quadruple therapy in hypertensive patients. Studies comparing quadpill therapy with monotherapy, dual therapy, or placebo were included. Data on BP reduction, achievement of target BP, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB-2) was used to assess study quality. <i>Results</i>: Five RCTs were included in the current systematic review. Quadpill therapy resulted in greater reductions in systolic BP (SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) compared to monotherapy and dual therapy across all time points. The proportion of patients achieving target BP (<140/90 mmHg) was significantly higher in the quadpill group. The safety profile was favorable, with adverse event rates comparable to those in monotherapy and dual therapy groups. Notable adverse effects included mild dizziness, edema, and biochemical alterations (elevated fasting glucose and uric acid levels), but these did not lead to significant treatment discontinuation. <i>Conclusions</i>: Quadruple low-dose combination therapy is a promising approach for improving BP control while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Early initiation of quadpill therapy could mitigate treatment inertia and improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12028849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61040764","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Hypertension remains a leading global cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control despite available treatments. Monotherapy often fails to achieve target BP, necessitating combination therapies. Quadruple low-dose combination therapy (quadpill) has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance efficacy while minimizing side effects. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of quadpill therapy compared to standard monotherapy and dual therapy. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception till January 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating quadruple therapy in hypertensive patients. Studies comparing quadpill therapy with monotherapy, dual therapy, or placebo were included. Data on BP reduction, achievement of target BP, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB-2) was used to assess study quality. Results: Five RCTs were included in the current systematic review. Quadpill therapy resulted in greater reductions in systolic BP (SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) compared to monotherapy and dual therapy across all time points. The proportion of patients achieving target BP (<140/90 mmHg) was significantly higher in the quadpill group. The safety profile was favorable, with adverse event rates comparable to those in monotherapy and dual therapy groups. Notable adverse effects included mild dizziness, edema, and biochemical alterations (elevated fasting glucose and uric acid levels), but these did not lead to significant treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Quadruple low-dose combination therapy is a promising approach for improving BP control while maintaining a favorable safety profile. Early initiation of quadpill therapy could mitigate treatment inertia and improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes.

四联疗法在高血压治疗中的应用:随机对照试验的系统综述。
背景和目的:高血压仍然是全球心血管疾病发病率和死亡率的主要原因,尽管有现有的治疗方法,但血压(BP)控制不佳。单药治疗往往不能达到目标血压,需要联合治疗。四联低剂量联合治疗(quadpill)已成为一种潜在的策略,以提高疗效,同时尽量减少副作用。本系统综述评价了四药治疗与标准单药治疗和双药治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus从创立到2025年1月,研究高血压患者四联疗法的随机对照试验(RCTs)。比较四药治疗与单药治疗、双药治疗或安慰剂的研究被纳入。提取并分析血压降低、达到目标血压和不良事件的数据。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(rob2)评估研究质量。结果:本系统综述纳入了5项随机对照试验。在所有时间点上,与单药治疗和双药治疗相比,四药治疗的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)降低幅度更大。结论:四次低剂量联合治疗是一种有希望改善血压控制的方法,同时保持良好的安全性。早期开始四药治疗可以减轻治疗惰性,改善长期心血管预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信