A single-centre, randomised trial to compare diagnostic yield and safety between endobronchial cryobiopsy and endobronchial forceps biopsy procedure in patients with endobronchial lesions.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lung India Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_452_24
Swapnendu Misra, Ankan Bandyopadhyay, Anupam Patra, Ritabrata Mitra, Amitava Sengupta, Somenath Kundu
{"title":"A single-centre, randomised trial to compare diagnostic yield and safety between endobronchial cryobiopsy and endobronchial forceps biopsy procedure in patients with endobronchial lesions.","authors":"Swapnendu Misra, Ankan Bandyopadhyay, Anupam Patra, Ritabrata Mitra, Amitava Sengupta, Somenath Kundu","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_452_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible bronchoscopy is the diagnostic tool of choice to diagnose endobronchial lesions. Pathological samples can be harvested using various techniques, for example, forceps biopsy, brushing, washing, and recently cryobiopsy. The major drawbacks of forceps biopsy technique are (a) obtaining of smaller tissues and (b) presence of crush artefacts. This results in a significant failure rate. Cryobiopsy is the procedure where application of extreme cold to the pathological tissues is used for obtaining samples. As a cryoprobe allows procurement of larger biopsy samples which is devoid of any crush artefacts, these result in better histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and identification of specific genetic mutations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current trial tried to assess (i) the diagnostic yield of endobronchial cryobiopsies in comparison with endobronchial forceps biopsies and (ii) assess the duration of procedures and requirement of interventions to control bleeding, among 49 patients who had undergone forceps biopsy and 48 patients who had undergone cryobiopsy. The types of endobronchial lesions observed during bronchoscopic procedures were divided into (a) exophytic type and (b) infiltrative type. Biopsy interpretations were done by an expert pathologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cryobiopsy compared to forceps biopsy had a statistically significant higher diagnostic yield for diagnosis of overall endobronchial lesions (P < 0.0001) for both exophytic (P = 0.015) and infiltrative (P < 0.0001) growth. Cryobiopsy obtained larger tissue (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of haemorrhage (P = 0.378) and duration (P = 0.173) between two procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cryobiopsies were more successful than forceps biopsies particularly for diagnosis of infiltrative growth. The complication rate was similar between the two procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"42 3","pages":"204-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_452_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flexible bronchoscopy is the diagnostic tool of choice to diagnose endobronchial lesions. Pathological samples can be harvested using various techniques, for example, forceps biopsy, brushing, washing, and recently cryobiopsy. The major drawbacks of forceps biopsy technique are (a) obtaining of smaller tissues and (b) presence of crush artefacts. This results in a significant failure rate. Cryobiopsy is the procedure where application of extreme cold to the pathological tissues is used for obtaining samples. As a cryoprobe allows procurement of larger biopsy samples which is devoid of any crush artefacts, these result in better histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and identification of specific genetic mutations.

Methods: The current trial tried to assess (i) the diagnostic yield of endobronchial cryobiopsies in comparison with endobronchial forceps biopsies and (ii) assess the duration of procedures and requirement of interventions to control bleeding, among 49 patients who had undergone forceps biopsy and 48 patients who had undergone cryobiopsy. The types of endobronchial lesions observed during bronchoscopic procedures were divided into (a) exophytic type and (b) infiltrative type. Biopsy interpretations were done by an expert pathologist.

Results: Cryobiopsy compared to forceps biopsy had a statistically significant higher diagnostic yield for diagnosis of overall endobronchial lesions (P < 0.0001) for both exophytic (P = 0.015) and infiltrative (P < 0.0001) growth. Cryobiopsy obtained larger tissue (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of haemorrhage (P = 0.378) and duration (P = 0.173) between two procedures.

Conclusions: Cryobiopsies were more successful than forceps biopsies particularly for diagnosis of infiltrative growth. The complication rate was similar between the two procedures.

一项单中心随机试验,比较支气管内冷冻活检和支气管内钳活检对支气管内病变患者的诊断率和安全性。
背景:柔性支气管镜是诊断支气管内病变的首选诊断工具。病理样本可以使用各种技术收集,例如,钳活检,刷牙,洗涤,最近冷冻活检。钳活检技术的主要缺点是(a)获得较小的组织和(b)存在挤压伪影。这将导致显著的故障率。低温活检是一种对病理组织施加极冷以获取样本的方法。由于冷冻探针可以获得更大的活检样本,而这些样本没有任何挤压伪影,因此可以获得更好的组织病理学、免疫组织化学和特定基因突变的鉴定。方法:目前的试验试图评估(i)支气管内冷冻活检的诊断率与支气管内镊子活检的比较,(ii)评估手术时间和干预措施的要求,以控制出血,在49例接受镊子活检的患者和48例接受冷冻活检的患者中。在支气管镜检查过程中观察到的支气管内病变类型分为(a)外生性和(b)浸润性。活检解释由病理学专家完成。结果:对于外生性(P = 0.015)和浸润性(P < 0.0001)的支气管病变,冷冻活检与钳活检相比具有统计学意义的更高的诊断率(P < 0.0001)。低温活检获得较大的组织(P < 0.001)。两种手术的出血发生率(P = 0.378)和持续时间(P = 0.173)差异无统计学意义。结论:低温活检比钳活检更能成功诊断浸润性生长。两种手术的并发症发生率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信