Comparison of Horizontal Jaw Relation Pathways of Edentulous Patients Recorded with a Digital Jaw Motion Tracking Device

IF 1.8
Ciocca Leonardo, Maltauro Mattia, Tozzi Federico, Elisa Vargiu, Meneghello Roberto, Angela Montanari, Laura Anderlucci
{"title":"Comparison of Horizontal Jaw Relation Pathways of Edentulous Patients Recorded with a Digital Jaw Motion Tracking Device","authors":"Ciocca Leonardo, Maltauro Mattia, Tozzi Federico, Elisa Vargiu, Meneghello Roberto, Angela Montanari, Laura Anderlucci","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This clinical study compares condyle path elements (CPE) in edentulous patients using fully adjustable (FA) and semi-adjustable (MS) digital articulators.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten patients with at least one edentulous jaw were included. Jaw relation records were digitally set in the articulators using two approaches: the MS group employed standard mean occlusal parameter values, while the FA group used individual values obtained using a digital jaw motion tracking device. Differences in CPEs, represented as Δ-values, were statistically analyzed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and post-hoc Tukey tepPst. These analyses evaluated overall differences between FA and MS articulators, identified the regions with the greatest Δ-errors, and determined the percentage of movement required for statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPEs differed significantly between semi- and fully adjustable articulators. Significant variations were observed in individual CPEs (P < .001), with motion percentage significantly influencing Δ-values ( P< .001). Notably, within the first 20% of CPEs MS pathways, significant differences were within the initial 2 mm of movement, a critical range for prosthetic rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights statistically significant differences in CPEs between semiand fully adjustable digital articulators, particularly within the initial 2 mm of movement. These findings underscore the importance of precise CPEs replication for occlusal design of complete dentures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This clinical study compares condyle path elements (CPE) in edentulous patients using fully adjustable (FA) and semi-adjustable (MS) digital articulators.

Materials and methods: Ten patients with at least one edentulous jaw were included. Jaw relation records were digitally set in the articulators using two approaches: the MS group employed standard mean occlusal parameter values, while the FA group used individual values obtained using a digital jaw motion tracking device. Differences in CPEs, represented as Δ-values, were statistically analyzed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and post-hoc Tukey tepPst. These analyses evaluated overall differences between FA and MS articulators, identified the regions with the greatest Δ-errors, and determined the percentage of movement required for statistical significance.

Results: CPEs differed significantly between semi- and fully adjustable articulators. Significant variations were observed in individual CPEs (P < .001), with motion percentage significantly influencing Δ-values ( P< .001). Notably, within the first 20% of CPEs MS pathways, significant differences were within the initial 2 mm of movement, a critical range for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Conclusion: This study highlights statistically significant differences in CPEs between semiand fully adjustable digital articulators, particularly within the initial 2 mm of movement. These findings underscore the importance of precise CPEs replication for occlusal design of complete dentures.

数字下颌运动跟踪仪记录无牙患者水平下颌关系通路的比较
目的:本临床研究比较全可调(FA)和半可调(MS)数字关节器在无牙患者中的髁突路径元件(CPE)。材料与方法:纳入10例至少1个无牙颌患者。下颌关系记录采用两种方法在咬合器中进行数字化设置:MS组采用标准平均咬合参数值,而FA组使用数字下颌运动跟踪装置获得的个体值。cpe的差异用Δ-values表示,采用非参数Wilcoxon符号秩检验和事后Tukey tepPst进行统计分析。这些分析评估了FA和MS关节之间的总体差异,确定了最大的区域Δ-errors,并确定了具有统计学意义所需的运动百分比。结果:半可调关节器与全可调关节器的cpe差异显著。个体cpe存在显著差异(P < 0.001),运动百分比显著影响Δ-values (P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,在前20%的cpe MS通路中,在最初的2mm运动范围内存在显著差异,这是假肢康复的关键范围。结论:本研究强调了半可调和全可调数字关节器之间cpe的统计学显著差异,特别是在运动的最初2毫米内。这些发现强调了精确的cpe复制对全口义齿咬合设计的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信