Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2025-04-19 DOI:10.1002/aur.70039
Courtney E. Breiner, Goldie A. McQuaid, Gregory L. Wallace, Hana F. Zickgraf
{"title":"Screening for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Symptoms Among Autistic Adults: Measurement Invariance With a Comparison General Sample","authors":"Courtney E. Breiner,&nbsp;Goldie A. McQuaid,&nbsp;Gregory L. Wallace,&nbsp;Hana F. Zickgraf","doi":"10.1002/aur.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Research suggests a higher prevalence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in autistic people across the lifespan compared to the general population. However, ARFID symptoms in autistic people may be misattributed to core autistic traits and gastrointestinal symptoms that often co-occur with autism. This diagnostic overshadowing could lead to the under-recognition and under-treatment of modifiable symptoms of psychopathology in autistic people. Validating ARFID symptom measures in this population is essential to screening for ARFID and tracking treatment outcomes in this population. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the equivalence of the factor structure, factor loadings, and item intercepts of the Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) between a sample of autistic adults (<i>n</i> = 248) who self-disclosed their diagnosis and a comparison general sample (<i>n</i> = 398). There was support for strong measurement invariance (configural, metric, and scalar) on the NIAS. Autistic adults scored significantly higher on each of the three subscales: selective eating (<i>d</i> = 0.54), appetite impairment (<i>d</i> = 0.27), and fear-driven avoidance of eating (<i>d</i> = 0.37). The NIAS is a valid instrument for measuring ARFID symptomatology in autistic adults. Autistic adults experience elevated symptomatology across all three ARFID eating restrictions. Future research should address whether evidence-based ARFID treatments are efficacious for autistic adults or need to be modified.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 7","pages":"1381-1388"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests a higher prevalence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in autistic people across the lifespan compared to the general population. However, ARFID symptoms in autistic people may be misattributed to core autistic traits and gastrointestinal symptoms that often co-occur with autism. This diagnostic overshadowing could lead to the under-recognition and under-treatment of modifiable symptoms of psychopathology in autistic people. Validating ARFID symptom measures in this population is essential to screening for ARFID and tracking treatment outcomes in this population. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the equivalence of the factor structure, factor loadings, and item intercepts of the Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) between a sample of autistic adults (n = 248) who self-disclosed their diagnosis and a comparison general sample (n = 398). There was support for strong measurement invariance (configural, metric, and scalar) on the NIAS. Autistic adults scored significantly higher on each of the three subscales: selective eating (d = 0.54), appetite impairment (d = 0.27), and fear-driven avoidance of eating (d = 0.37). The NIAS is a valid instrument for measuring ARFID symptomatology in autistic adults. Autistic adults experience elevated symptomatology across all three ARFID eating restrictions. Future research should address whether evidence-based ARFID treatments are efficacious for autistic adults or need to be modified.

自闭症成人中回避/限制性食物摄入障碍症状的筛查:与一般样本比较的测量不变性
研究表明,与一般人群相比,自闭症患者一生中出现回避/限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)的比例更高。然而,自闭症患者的ARFID症状可能被错误地归因于自闭症的核心特征和胃肠道症状,这些症状通常与自闭症同时发生。这种诊断的阴影可能导致对自闭症患者可改变的精神病理症状的认识不足和治疗不足。在该人群中验证ARFID症状测量对于筛查ARFID和跟踪该人群的治疗结果至关重要。采用多组验证性因子分析评估自我披露诊断的自闭症成人样本(n = 248)与比较一般样本(n = 398)在九项ARFID筛查(NIAS)中的因子结构、因子负荷和项目截点的等效性。在NIAS上有对强测量不变性(配置、度量和标量)的支持。自闭症成年人在选择性进食(d = 0.54)、食欲障碍(d = 0.27)和因恐惧而回避进食(d = 0.37)这三个分量表上的得分都明显更高。NIAS是测量自闭症成人ARFID症状的有效工具。自闭症成年人在所有三项ARFID饮食限制中都经历了升高的症状。未来的研究应该解决基于证据的ARFID治疗是否对自闭症成年人有效,或者是否需要修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信