Ocular Toxicity in GD-2 Antibody Therapy: A Case Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Brooke Fraser
{"title":"Ocular Toxicity in GD-2 Antibody Therapy: A Case Study.","authors":"Brooke Fraser","doi":"10.1177/27527530251318685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ocular toxicities in children with neuroblastoma receiving GD-2 antibody therapy such as dinutuximab are uncommon. The objectives of this case study are to highlight the presentation and treatment of two ocular toxicities: pupillary palsy affecting visual acuity and photophobia, along with emphasizing the role of care providers in recognition and reporting of ocular adverse effects. <b>Method:</b> A 6-year-old boy with high-risk neuroblastoma presented to the outpatient clinic 4 days after completion of dinutuximab therapy stating that he was \"going blind\" and \"the light hurt his eyes.\" He was treated with 1% pilocarpine drops and sunglasses for comfort after evaluation by ophthalmology. <b>Results:</b> The boy was diagnosed with bilateral mydriasis. The use of pilocarpine reportedly made him less photosensitive and provided some improvement to his pupillary palsy. His visual acuity did not appear to return to baseline; however, baseline examination was never performed. Further treatment with dinutuximab was not modified nor withheld, as providers were unable to fully determine degree of toxicity without baseline screening, and risk of dose modification or deletion was greater than current ocular toxicity. <b>Discussion:</b> Measuring a change in visual acuity and pupillary response is impossible without a baseline screening before commencing GD-2 antibody therapy. Although there is significant literature and reports on the identification and management of common side effects of GD-2 antibody therapy, less common ocular toxicities are possibly underreported with little guidance on management, thus making recognition and subsequent treatment challenging for nurses and providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"51-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530251318685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ocular toxicities in children with neuroblastoma receiving GD-2 antibody therapy such as dinutuximab are uncommon. The objectives of this case study are to highlight the presentation and treatment of two ocular toxicities: pupillary palsy affecting visual acuity and photophobia, along with emphasizing the role of care providers in recognition and reporting of ocular adverse effects. Method: A 6-year-old boy with high-risk neuroblastoma presented to the outpatient clinic 4 days after completion of dinutuximab therapy stating that he was "going blind" and "the light hurt his eyes." He was treated with 1% pilocarpine drops and sunglasses for comfort after evaluation by ophthalmology. Results: The boy was diagnosed with bilateral mydriasis. The use of pilocarpine reportedly made him less photosensitive and provided some improvement to his pupillary palsy. His visual acuity did not appear to return to baseline; however, baseline examination was never performed. Further treatment with dinutuximab was not modified nor withheld, as providers were unable to fully determine degree of toxicity without baseline screening, and risk of dose modification or deletion was greater than current ocular toxicity. Discussion: Measuring a change in visual acuity and pupillary response is impossible without a baseline screening before commencing GD-2 antibody therapy. Although there is significant literature and reports on the identification and management of common side effects of GD-2 antibody therapy, less common ocular toxicities are possibly underreported with little guidance on management, thus making recognition and subsequent treatment challenging for nurses and providers.

GD-2抗体治疗的眼毒性:一个案例研究。
背景:神经母细胞瘤患儿接受GD-2抗体治疗(如迪努妥昔单抗)的眼部毒性并不常见。本案例研究的目的是强调两种眼部毒性的表现和治疗:影响视力的瞳孔麻痹和畏光,同时强调护理提供者在识别和报告眼部不良反应中的作用。方法:一名患有高危神经母细胞瘤的6岁男孩在完成地努妥昔单抗治疗4天后来到门诊,声称他“快要失明”,“光线伤害他的眼睛”。经眼科评估后给予1%匹罗卡品滴剂和太阳镜治疗。结果:诊断为双侧瞳孔肿大。据报道,使用匹罗卡品使他的光敏性降低,并对瞳孔麻痹有一定改善。他的视力似乎没有恢复到基线;然而,基线检查从未进行过。由于没有基线筛查,提供者无法完全确定毒性程度,并且剂量修改或删除的风险大于目前的眼部毒性,因此没有修改或保留使用迪努妥昔单抗进行进一步治疗。讨论:在开始GD-2抗体治疗之前,如果没有基线筛查,就不可能测量视力和瞳孔反应的变化。虽然在识别和处理GD-2抗体治疗的常见副作用方面有大量的文献和报道,但不太常见的眼部毒性可能被低估,而且缺乏管理指导,因此对护士和提供者来说,识别和后续治疗都是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信