Dominique Riddell, Rachel Harron, John Hildyard, Dominic Wells, Richard Piercy
{"title":"Evaluation of a six-minute walk test in the DE50-MD canine model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and its effect on blood-borne biomarkers.","authors":"Dominique Riddell, Rachel Harron, John Hildyard, Dominic Wells, Richard Piercy","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23269.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal muscle wasting disease caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene resulting in cycles of muscle degeneration, inflammation and regeneration. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a key functional outcome measure for DMD patient clinical trials and has been adapted for use in animal models of the disease. The DE50-MD dog model of DMD closely reflects the DMD patient phenotype prior to loss of ambulation. For pre-clinical trials using this model, functional outcome measures must be established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal study compared distance walked in a 6MWT by DE50-MD and WT control dogs and assessed the utility of the 6MWT as a functional biomarker. Dogs underwent two 6MWTs conducted approximately 48-hours apart, at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months of age. In addition, we evaluated the stability of selected blood-borne biomarkers in 12-month old DE50-MD and WT dogs 0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours following a 6MWT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DE50-MD dogs exhibited significantly shorter 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) than WT dogs at all timepoints (P<0.05), with no difference in 6MWD between the first and second 6MWT. C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), myomesin-3 (MYOM3) and myostatin (MSTN) were biomarkers of the DE50-MD phenotype that remained unchanged in DE50-MD dogs following the 6MWT, while creatine kinase (CK) activity significantly increased 3-hours following the test in DE50-MD dogs but remained unchanged in WT dogs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 6MWT effectively discriminates DE50-MD from WT dogs aged 3-18 months and a single 6MWT is sufficient for future studies. Serum MYOM3, CCL2 and MSTN are good biomarkers of the DE50-MD phenotype that are unaffected by the relatively low level exertion performed in the 6MWT by 12-month-old DE50-MD dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23269.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal muscle wasting disease caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene resulting in cycles of muscle degeneration, inflammation and regeneration. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a key functional outcome measure for DMD patient clinical trials and has been adapted for use in animal models of the disease. The DE50-MD dog model of DMD closely reflects the DMD patient phenotype prior to loss of ambulation. For pre-clinical trials using this model, functional outcome measures must be established.
Methods: This longitudinal study compared distance walked in a 6MWT by DE50-MD and WT control dogs and assessed the utility of the 6MWT as a functional biomarker. Dogs underwent two 6MWTs conducted approximately 48-hours apart, at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months of age. In addition, we evaluated the stability of selected blood-borne biomarkers in 12-month old DE50-MD and WT dogs 0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 hours following a 6MWT.
Results: DE50-MD dogs exhibited significantly shorter 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) than WT dogs at all timepoints (P<0.05), with no difference in 6MWD between the first and second 6MWT. C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), myomesin-3 (MYOM3) and myostatin (MSTN) were biomarkers of the DE50-MD phenotype that remained unchanged in DE50-MD dogs following the 6MWT, while creatine kinase (CK) activity significantly increased 3-hours following the test in DE50-MD dogs but remained unchanged in WT dogs.
Conclusions: The 6MWT effectively discriminates DE50-MD from WT dogs aged 3-18 months and a single 6MWT is sufficient for future studies. Serum MYOM3, CCL2 and MSTN are good biomarkers of the DE50-MD phenotype that are unaffected by the relatively low level exertion performed in the 6MWT by 12-month-old DE50-MD dogs.
Wellcome Open ResearchBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍:
Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.