Endoscope-assisted retrieval of separated instruments: An ex vivo comparative study of Masserann, microsonic, and loop techniques.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Cangül Keskin, Ali Keleş, Burcu Pirimoğlu, Defne Toplu
{"title":"Endoscope-assisted retrieval of separated instruments: An ex vivo comparative study of Masserann, microsonic, and loop techniques.","authors":"Cangül Keskin, Ali Keleş, Burcu Pirimoğlu, Defne Toplu","doi":"10.1177/09544119251331711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Instrument separation during root canal treatment can hinder effective cleaning and shaping, making reliable retrieval techniques essential. Endoscopic visualization might aid in instrument removal procedures offering direct magnification of root canal anatomy. This ex vivo study evaluated the success rate and procedure time of three instrument retrieval techniques - Masserann, microsonic, and loop techniques - under the visualization of dental operation microscope (DOM) assisted by an endoscope. Sixty extracted human mandibular single-rooted teeth with simulated fractures were assigned to the Masserann, microsonic, or ultrasonic with loop techniques (<i>n</i> = 20/group), each performed under endoscopic visualization alongside DOM. The success rate of instrument removal and procedure time were recorded. Complications, such as root perforation, apical extrusion and secondary fracture, were recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> and Kruskal-Wallis tests with 5% significance threshold. Success rates for the microsonic, Masserann, and ultrasonic with loop techniques were 80%, 70%, and 80%, respectively (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The average procedure times were 13.02 min for the microsonic technique, 17.25 min for the Masserann technique, and 17 min for the ultrasonic with loop technique (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The Masserann technique demonstrated a higher complication rate, with two cases each of perforation and apical extrusion, whereas no secondary fractures occurred in any group. Conclusively, the microsonic technique showed the highest success rate with the shortest retrieval time, indicating its efficiency and suitability for instrument removal from root canals, particularly when combined with enhanced visualization through endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":"239 4","pages":"381-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119251331711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instrument separation during root canal treatment can hinder effective cleaning and shaping, making reliable retrieval techniques essential. Endoscopic visualization might aid in instrument removal procedures offering direct magnification of root canal anatomy. This ex vivo study evaluated the success rate and procedure time of three instrument retrieval techniques - Masserann, microsonic, and loop techniques - under the visualization of dental operation microscope (DOM) assisted by an endoscope. Sixty extracted human mandibular single-rooted teeth with simulated fractures were assigned to the Masserann, microsonic, or ultrasonic with loop techniques (n = 20/group), each performed under endoscopic visualization alongside DOM. The success rate of instrument removal and procedure time were recorded. Complications, such as root perforation, apical extrusion and secondary fracture, were recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests with 5% significance threshold. Success rates for the microsonic, Masserann, and ultrasonic with loop techniques were 80%, 70%, and 80%, respectively (p > 0.05). The average procedure times were 13.02 min for the microsonic technique, 17.25 min for the Masserann technique, and 17 min for the ultrasonic with loop technique (p > 0.05). The Masserann technique demonstrated a higher complication rate, with two cases each of perforation and apical extrusion, whereas no secondary fractures occurred in any group. Conclusively, the microsonic technique showed the highest success rate with the shortest retrieval time, indicating its efficiency and suitability for instrument removal from root canals, particularly when combined with enhanced visualization through endoscopy.

内窥镜辅助分离器械的检索:马塞兰、微音和循环技术的离体比较研究。
在根管治疗过程中器械分离会妨碍有效的清洁和塑形,因此可靠的回收技术是必不可少的。内窥镜可视化可能有助于器械移除过程,提供根管解剖的直接放大。本研究评估了在内窥镜辅助下,在牙科手术显微镜(DOM)的显像下,三种器械回收技术(Masserann、microsonic和loop技术)的成功率和手术时间。60颗拔出的模拟骨折的人类下颌单根牙齿被分配到Masserann、微声或超声环技术(n = 20/组),每组在内镜下与DOM一起进行可视化。记录器械取出成功率和手术时间。并发症,如根穿孔,根尖挤压和继发骨折的记录。统计学分析采用Pearson χ2和Kruskal-Wallis检验,显著性阈值为5%。超声、Masserann和超声环技术的成功率分别为80%、70%和80% (p > 0.05)。超声技术的平均手术时间为13.02 min, Masserann技术为17.25 min,超声带环技术为17 min (p < 0.05)。Masserann技术显示出更高的并发症发生率,穿孔和根尖挤压各2例,而任何组均未发生继发性骨折。总之,超声技术在最短的取出时间内显示出最高的成功率,表明其从根管中取出器械的效率和适用性,特别是当结合内镜增强的可视化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信