Effects of Cognitive Engagement on Physical Performance and Perceived Workload During Isometric Exertions of Index Finger.

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sidharajsinh Jadeja, Pranav Madhav Kuber, Ehsan Rashedi
{"title":"Effects of Cognitive Engagement on Physical Performance and Perceived Workload During Isometric Exertions of Index Finger.","authors":"Sidharajsinh Jadeja, Pranav Madhav Kuber, Ehsan Rashedi","doi":"10.1177/00187208251332777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe influence of varying cognitive loading was examined at a moderate level of 25% maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) in a static task.BackgroundRepetitive low-intensity tasks can lead to fatigue, eventually reducing task performance. This study explores the benefits of providing additional cognitive loading during breaks and while performing intermittent tasks on fatigue progression.MethodsIntermittent isometric abductions of the index finger were performed by six male and female subjects for four experimental conditions including passive rest and added cognitive load in the form of an arithmetic task. Both subjective and objective measures of discomfort, muscle activity, physical and mental task performance, muscle capacity, and task demands were compared across genders and conditions.ResultActive breaks with cognitive engagement reduced fatigue compared to passive rest in terms of muscle activity, capacity, and physical demand. Moreover, moderate cognitive demand in concurrence with physical task showed most favorable results as subjects showed lowest perceived fatigue (1.66/10), physical demand (30/100), and muscle activity (0.184 volts) as well as highest muscle capacity retention (92.4%). Further addition of concurrent cognitive demand at a high level showed similar perceived fatigue (1.67/10) and physical demand (32/100) but demonstrated higher muscle activity (0.239 volts) and lower muscle capacity retention (89.9%).ApplicationsFindings demonstrate importance of tailoring cognitive demands based on gender and occupational settings, with moderate mental tasks during breaks offering the most favorable results overall, enhancing recovery and reducing muscle activity without compromising task performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251332777"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251332777","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe influence of varying cognitive loading was examined at a moderate level of 25% maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) in a static task.BackgroundRepetitive low-intensity tasks can lead to fatigue, eventually reducing task performance. This study explores the benefits of providing additional cognitive loading during breaks and while performing intermittent tasks on fatigue progression.MethodsIntermittent isometric abductions of the index finger were performed by six male and female subjects for four experimental conditions including passive rest and added cognitive load in the form of an arithmetic task. Both subjective and objective measures of discomfort, muscle activity, physical and mental task performance, muscle capacity, and task demands were compared across genders and conditions.ResultActive breaks with cognitive engagement reduced fatigue compared to passive rest in terms of muscle activity, capacity, and physical demand. Moreover, moderate cognitive demand in concurrence with physical task showed most favorable results as subjects showed lowest perceived fatigue (1.66/10), physical demand (30/100), and muscle activity (0.184 volts) as well as highest muscle capacity retention (92.4%). Further addition of concurrent cognitive demand at a high level showed similar perceived fatigue (1.67/10) and physical demand (32/100) but demonstrated higher muscle activity (0.239 volts) and lower muscle capacity retention (89.9%).ApplicationsFindings demonstrate importance of tailoring cognitive demands based on gender and occupational settings, with moderate mental tasks during breaks offering the most favorable results overall, enhancing recovery and reducing muscle activity without compromising task performance.

认知参与对食指等长动作体力表现和感知工作量的影响。
目的研究静态任务中25%最大自主收缩(MVC)的负荷变化对认知负荷的影响。重复的低强度任务会导致疲劳,最终降低任务绩效。本研究探讨了在休息和执行间歇任务时提供额外认知负荷对疲劳进展的好处。方法在被动休息和增加算术任务认知负荷的四种实验条件下,对6名男性和女性受试者进行间歇性等距外展食指。主观和客观的不适、肌肉活动、身体和精神任务表现、肌肉容量和任务需求的衡量标准在不同性别和条件下进行了比较。结果与被动休息相比,认知参与的主动休息在肌肉活动、能力和身体需求方面减少了疲劳。适度的认知需求配合体力任务表现出最低的疲劳知觉(1.66/10)、体力需求知觉(30/100)、肌肉活动知觉(0.184伏)和最高的肌肉容量保留(92.4%)。在高水平下,进一步增加并发认知需求显示出相似的感知疲劳(1.67/10)和物理需求(32/100),但显示出更高的肌肉活动(0.239伏)和更低的肌肉容量保留(89.9%)。研究结果表明,基于性别和职业环境定制认知需求的重要性,在休息期间适度的脑力任务提供了最有利的结果,在不影响任务表现的情况下增强恢复和减少肌肉活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信