Concierge-Level Care for Underserved Communities: Not a Pipe Dream.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Donald T Erwin, Alexandria Fischer, Mark Litvak, Eugene Litvak
{"title":"Concierge-Level Care for Underserved Communities: Not a Pipe Dream.","authors":"Donald T Erwin, Alexandria Fischer, Mark Litvak, Eugene Litvak","doi":"10.1177/21501319251332458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>St. Thomas (STCHC) has a long history of serving an urban, uninsured, and underinsured (Medicaid) population in the greater New Orleans area. Beginning in 2010, STCHC faced financial danger when Louisiana did not expand Medicaid coverage. Partnering with the nonprofit Institute for Healthcare Optimization (IHO), we increased patient throughput by balancing the clinic's resources between two modalities of care: urgent (same/next day) appointments in which patients were seen by whichever provider was available; and less urgent, in which patients saw their preferred PCP at the provider's availability. Assessing patient's appointment preferences was crucial in directing this innovation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 8913 appointments and patients' priorities between being cared for by a preferred provider or being seen on the same/next day. Appointment outcomes (i.e., occurred, no-show, canceled, or rescheduled) were matched to each preference group and no-show rates were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When 80% to 90% of same-day requests were satisfied, the proportion of no-shows declined significantly, and patients' satisfaction with access to care reached 97%. Clinic appointment kept rate became 87% (95% CI [0.869975, 0.870025]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disseminating these results nationwide would result in many lives and millions of dollars saved. Large-scale educational and implementation efforts are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251332458"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251332458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: St. Thomas (STCHC) has a long history of serving an urban, uninsured, and underinsured (Medicaid) population in the greater New Orleans area. Beginning in 2010, STCHC faced financial danger when Louisiana did not expand Medicaid coverage. Partnering with the nonprofit Institute for Healthcare Optimization (IHO), we increased patient throughput by balancing the clinic's resources between two modalities of care: urgent (same/next day) appointments in which patients were seen by whichever provider was available; and less urgent, in which patients saw their preferred PCP at the provider's availability. Assessing patient's appointment preferences was crucial in directing this innovation.

Methods: We analyzed 8913 appointments and patients' priorities between being cared for by a preferred provider or being seen on the same/next day. Appointment outcomes (i.e., occurred, no-show, canceled, or rescheduled) were matched to each preference group and no-show rates were calculated.

Results: When 80% to 90% of same-day requests were satisfied, the proportion of no-shows declined significantly, and patients' satisfaction with access to care reached 97%. Clinic appointment kept rate became 87% (95% CI [0.869975, 0.870025]).

Conclusions: Disseminating these results nationwide would result in many lives and millions of dollars saved. Large-scale educational and implementation efforts are needed.

为服务不足的社区提供礼宾级护理:不是白日梦。
简介:St. Thomas (STCHC)有着悠久的历史服务于城市,没有保险,和保险不足(医疗补助)人口在大新奥尔良地区。从2010年开始,当路易斯安那州没有扩大医疗补助覆盖范围时,STCHC面临财政危机。我们与非营利组织医疗保健优化研究所(IHO)合作,通过平衡诊所在两种护理模式之间的资源,提高了患者的吞吐量:紧急(同一天/第二天)预约,患者由任何可用的提供者就诊;较不紧急的情况下,患者在提供者的可用性下看到他们首选的PCP。评估患者的预约偏好是指导这一创新的关键。方法:分析8913例预约和患者在首选服务提供者就诊与同一天/第二天就诊之间的优先顺序。预约结果(即已发生、未出现、取消或重新安排)与每个偏好组相匹配,并计算未出现率。结果:当日就诊满意率在80% ~ 90%之间时,未就诊比例明显下降,患者就诊满意度达到97%。门诊预约守约率为87% (95% CI[0.869975, 0.870025])。结论:在全国范围内传播这些结果将挽救许多生命并节省数百万美元。需要大规模的教育和执行工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信