Myths and Facts About Allograft Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Detailed Review of the Literature.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00013
Benjamin R Paul, Joey Robaina, Romir Parmar, Thomas Carter, Anup Shah
{"title":"Myths and Facts About Allograft Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Detailed Review of the Literature.","authors":"Benjamin R Paul, Joey Robaina, Romir Parmar, Thomas Carter, Anup Shah","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>» Patient-Specific Graft Selection: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) requires a nuanced approach that considers various patient-specific factors, such as age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgical goals. Generally, allografts are preferred for older patients with less active lifestyles, whereas autografts are more suitable for younger, active patients because of autografts' lower retear rates.» Impact of Sterilization Techniques: Sterilization and processing techniques significantly affect the biomechanical properties and outcomes of allografts. While high-dose irradiation reduces allograft strength and compromises healing, low-dose irradiation or nonirradiated grafts offer superior biomechanical and clinical outcomes. However, standardized sterilization protocols are yet to be established.» Comparative Outcomes of Allografts and Autografts: Evaluating the literature on allografts vs. autografts in ACLR remains challenging because of the significant variability in patient characteristics, outcome measures, graft strength testing, and sterilization techniques across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.25.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

» Patient-Specific Graft Selection: Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) requires a nuanced approach that considers various patient-specific factors, such as age, activity level, comorbidities, and surgical goals. Generally, allografts are preferred for older patients with less active lifestyles, whereas autografts are more suitable for younger, active patients because of autografts' lower retear rates.» Impact of Sterilization Techniques: Sterilization and processing techniques significantly affect the biomechanical properties and outcomes of allografts. While high-dose irradiation reduces allograft strength and compromises healing, low-dose irradiation or nonirradiated grafts offer superior biomechanical and clinical outcomes. However, standardized sterilization protocols are yet to be established.» Comparative Outcomes of Allografts and Autografts: Evaluating the literature on allografts vs. autografts in ACLR remains challenging because of the significant variability in patient characteristics, outcome measures, graft strength testing, and sterilization techniques across studies.

关于同种异体移植用于前交叉韧带重建的误解和事实:详细的文献回顾。
»患者特异性移植物选择:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)的移植物选择需要细致入微的方法,考虑各种患者特异性因素,如年龄、活动水平、合并症和手术目标。一般来说,同种异体移植物更适合生活方式不活跃的老年患者,而自体移植物更适合年轻、活跃的患者,因为自体移植物的复发率较低。灭菌技术的影响:灭菌和处理技术显著影响同种异体移植物的生物力学特性和结果。虽然高剂量照射会降低同种异体移植物的强度并影响愈合,但低剂量照射或未照射的移植物可提供优越的生物力学和临床结果。然而,标准化的消毒规程尚未建立。»同种异体移植物和自体移植物的比较结果:由于患者特征、结果测量、移植物强度测试和灭菌技术的显著差异,评估ACLR中同种异体移植物和自体移植物的文献仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Reviews
JBJS Reviews SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信