Estimating the incidence of transfusion-associated circulatory overload using active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.1111/trf.18258
Sandra K White, Brandon S Walker, Scott Potter, David Anderson, Ryan A Metcalf
{"title":"Estimating the incidence of transfusion-associated circulatory overload using active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sandra K White, Brandon S Walker, Scott Potter, David Anderson, Ryan A Metcalf","doi":"10.1111/trf.18258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is an adverse event that is the leading cause of transfusion-related death. It is underrecognized, and the aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence from active surveillance studies to estimate its incidence.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications reporting TACO incidence using active surveillance. A research librarian searched Medline and Embase, identifying publications between January 1991 and June 2024. Studies reporting TACO either by patient, blood component (red blood cells [RBCs], platelets, or plasma) or transfusion episode were identified, and all patient settings were eligible. A random effects model estimated TACO incidence, and potential sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies met eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The rate per patient was 22.2/1000 (95% CI: 16.2-29.2) based on 21 studies. The rate estimate of TACO among total blood components (RBCs, plasma, and platelets combined) reported in 10 studies was 2.2/1000 units transfused (95% CI: 1.2-3.5/1000). There was substantial between-study variation in rates and more recent studies tended to report higher rates. Although the platelet point estimate was higher than the point estimates for RBCs and plasma, the confidence intervals overlapped. Only two studies reported TACO rates per transfusion episode and the pooled estimate was 6.3/1000 (95% CI: 1-16.3/1000), about three times greater than the overall per unit estimate.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Clinicians should consider quantitative risks of important transfusion-related harms, such as TACO, when making the decision to transfuse.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) is an adverse event that is the leading cause of transfusion-related death. It is underrecognized, and the aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence from active surveillance studies to estimate its incidence.

Study design and methods: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of publications reporting TACO incidence using active surveillance. A research librarian searched Medline and Embase, identifying publications between January 1991 and June 2024. Studies reporting TACO either by patient, blood component (red blood cells [RBCs], platelets, or plasma) or transfusion episode were identified, and all patient settings were eligible. A random effects model estimated TACO incidence, and potential sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using meta-regression.

Results: Twenty-two studies met eligibility criteria and were included for analysis. The rate per patient was 22.2/1000 (95% CI: 16.2-29.2) based on 21 studies. The rate estimate of TACO among total blood components (RBCs, plasma, and platelets combined) reported in 10 studies was 2.2/1000 units transfused (95% CI: 1.2-3.5/1000). There was substantial between-study variation in rates and more recent studies tended to report higher rates. Although the platelet point estimate was higher than the point estimates for RBCs and plasma, the confidence intervals overlapped. Only two studies reported TACO rates per transfusion episode and the pooled estimate was 6.3/1000 (95% CI: 1-16.3/1000), about three times greater than the overall per unit estimate.

Discussion: Clinicians should consider quantitative risks of important transfusion-related harms, such as TACO, when making the decision to transfuse.

使用主动监测估计输血相关循环负荷的发生率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:输血相关循环负荷(TACO)是一种不良事件,是输血相关死亡的主要原因。它未被充分认识,本研究的目的是综合主动监测研究的现有证据,以估计其发病率。研究设计和方法:本研究对采用主动监测报道TACO发病率的出版物进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。一位研究馆员搜索了Medline和Embase,确定了1991年1月至2024年6月之间的出版物。通过患者、血液成分(红细胞、血小板或血浆)或输血事件报告TACO的研究被确定,所有患者环境均符合条件。随机效应模型估计TACO的发生率,并使用meta回归评估潜在的异质性来源。结果:22项研究符合入选标准并纳入分析。根据21项研究,每名患者的发生率为22.2/1000 (95% CI: 16.2-29.2)。在10项研究中报告的总血液成分(红细胞、血浆和血小板组合)中TACO的发生率估计为2.2/1000单位输血(95% CI: 1.2-3.5/1000)。不同研究之间的比率差异很大,最近的研究往往报告更高的比率。虽然血小板点估计值高于红细胞和血浆点估计值,但置信区间重叠。只有两项研究报告了每次输血的TACO发生率,汇总估计值为6.3/1000 (95% CI: 1-16.3/1000),约为每单位估计值的三倍。讨论:临床医生在决定是否输血时,应考虑重要输血相关危害的定量风险,如TACO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信