Individualized task difficulty promotes balance training outcomes and self-efficacy in individuals with lower limb loss.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Fu-Lien Wu, Yu-Chen Chung, Szu-Ping Lee
{"title":"Individualized task difficulty promotes balance training outcomes and self-efficacy in individuals with lower limb loss.","authors":"Fu-Lien Wu, Yu-Chen Chung, Szu-Ping Lee","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ideal motor skill learning typically features adaptive task difficulty to facilitate training outcomes and avoid frustration, yet this concept has not been explored in balance training for individuals with diminished postural control including lower limb loss. The purposes of this study were (1) to examine a novel stabilometer-based task with individualized difficulty levels as a balance training protocol and (2) to compare the task performance and self-efficacy between participants receiving the training with and without individualized task difficulty. Ten older adults and 10 individuals with unilateral lower limb amputation were recruited. The experimental group received training with task difficulty individualized based on their pretraining weight-bearing capacities, whereas the control group received standard training without difficulty adjustment. Participants were instructed to maintain the stabilometer in a horizontal position for as long as possible over 20 trials (4 blocks, 30 s per trial). Performance feedback and task-related self-efficacy were assessed after each block. Participants in the 2 groups were comparable in age (62.1 vs. 63.5 years), gender composition (4 females), and amputation levels (3 with transfemoral amputation). Significant interactions between group and trial/block in time in balance (experimental group: 7.8 to 16.9 s, control: 8.5 to 8.2 s, P = 0.002), root-mean-square error (experimental group: 10.9° to 6.8°, control: 10.9° to 10.8°, P = 0.002), and self-efficacy (P = 0.005∼0.012) were detected. The training protocol with individualized difficulty levels promoted greater improvements in balance performance and self-efficacy. Individualizing task difficulty based on participant's capacity is important for improving balance performance and self-efficacy. This training protocol is feasible and can be applied clinically to improve balance and postural confidence in individuals with lower limb loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000454","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ideal motor skill learning typically features adaptive task difficulty to facilitate training outcomes and avoid frustration, yet this concept has not been explored in balance training for individuals with diminished postural control including lower limb loss. The purposes of this study were (1) to examine a novel stabilometer-based task with individualized difficulty levels as a balance training protocol and (2) to compare the task performance and self-efficacy between participants receiving the training with and without individualized task difficulty. Ten older adults and 10 individuals with unilateral lower limb amputation were recruited. The experimental group received training with task difficulty individualized based on their pretraining weight-bearing capacities, whereas the control group received standard training without difficulty adjustment. Participants were instructed to maintain the stabilometer in a horizontal position for as long as possible over 20 trials (4 blocks, 30 s per trial). Performance feedback and task-related self-efficacy were assessed after each block. Participants in the 2 groups were comparable in age (62.1 vs. 63.5 years), gender composition (4 females), and amputation levels (3 with transfemoral amputation). Significant interactions between group and trial/block in time in balance (experimental group: 7.8 to 16.9 s, control: 8.5 to 8.2 s, P = 0.002), root-mean-square error (experimental group: 10.9° to 6.8°, control: 10.9° to 10.8°, P = 0.002), and self-efficacy (P = 0.005∼0.012) were detected. The training protocol with individualized difficulty levels promoted greater improvements in balance performance and self-efficacy. Individualizing task difficulty based on participant's capacity is important for improving balance performance and self-efficacy. This training protocol is feasible and can be applied clinically to improve balance and postural confidence in individuals with lower limb loss.

个性化任务困难促进了下肢丧失患者的平衡训练结果和自我效能感。
理想的运动技能学习通常具有适应性任务难度,以促进训练结果并避免挫折,但这一概念尚未在姿势控制减退(包括下肢丧失)个体的平衡训练中得到探索。本研究的目的是:(1)检验一种新的基于稳定计的个性化难度任务作为平衡训练方案;(2)比较有和没有个性化任务难度训练的参与者的任务绩效和自我效能。招募了10名老年人和10名单侧下肢截肢者。实验组根据训练前负重能力进行任务难度个性化训练,对照组进行难度不调整的标准训练。参与者被要求在20次试验中尽可能长时间地将稳定计保持在水平位置(4次,每次30秒)。每个区块后评估绩效反馈和任务相关自我效能。两组患者的年龄(62.1岁对63.5岁)、性别构成(4名女性)和截肢程度(3名经股动脉截肢)具有可比性。在平衡时间(实验组:7.8 ~ 16.9 s,对照组:8.5 ~ 8.2 s, P = 0.002)、均方根误差(实验组:10.9°~ 6.8°,对照组:10.9°~ 10.8°,P = 0.002)和自我效能(P = 0.005 ~ 0.012)方面,组与试验/块之间存在显著的交互作用。具有个性化难度水平的训练方案促进了平衡表现和自我效能的更大改善。根据被试的能力对任务难度进行个性化处理,对平衡能力和自我效能感的提高具有重要意义。该训练方案是可行的,可以在临床上应用于改善下肢丧失患者的平衡和姿势自信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信