Is Partial Nephrectomy A Primary Option for Patients with T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma-A National Population-Based Study.

0 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sven Lundstam, Tarik Almdalal, Andreas Karlsson Rosenblad, Börje Ljungberg
{"title":"Is Partial Nephrectomy A Primary Option for Patients with T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma-A National Population-Based Study.","authors":"Sven Lundstam, Tarik Almdalal, Andreas Karlsson Rosenblad, Börje Ljungberg","doi":"10.5152/tud.2025.24081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in clinical T1 RCC generally exhibit a favorable prognosis. Guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy (PN), also for cT1b RCCs. Despite a favorable prognosis, there remains risks for upstaging and recurrence for cT1b RCC patients, and the preference for PN has been questionable. Clinical and morphological variables and overall survival (OS) were characterized in a national realworld population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register 2005-2014, with non-metastatic cT1bRCC patients treated surgically and having !5 years potential follow-up were included (n = 2006). Patients gender, age, stage, tumor size, RCC type, local and distant tumor recurrence were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2006 patients (1219 males, 787 females; mean age 66 years), 1705 underwent radical nephrectomy (RN), and 301 PN. Upstage from cT1b to pathological T3a occurred in 304 (15%) patients. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 318 (16%) patients, with higher rates in pT3a (25%) compared to pT1b (14%). There was no significant difference in disease recurrences observed between the surgical techniques. Factors associated with increased recurrence risk included age, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor size, while papillary and chromophobe RCCs were associated with decreased risk. Patients with pT3a RCC had a worse 5-year OS rate (67%) compared with pT1b (83%; P < .001, log-rank test). In adjusted analyses, age, tumor size, pT-stage, and pN- stage were associated with OS, while treatment with PN was non-inferior compared with RN (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI: 0.71-1.45, P = .431).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with clinical T1b RCCs face a non-negligible risk for tumor upstaging, disease recurrence, and decreased OS. The adjusted analyses showed that PN was non-inferior to RN, supporting the recommendation to offer PN.</p>","PeriodicalId":101337,"journal":{"name":"Urology research & practice","volume":"50 6","pages":"322-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology research & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2025.24081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients in clinical T1 RCC generally exhibit a favorable prognosis. Guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy (PN), also for cT1b RCCs. Despite a favorable prognosis, there remains risks for upstaging and recurrence for cT1b RCC patients, and the preference for PN has been questionable. Clinical and morphological variables and overall survival (OS) were characterized in a national realworld population.

Methods: Data from the the National Swedish Kidney Cancer Register 2005-2014, with non-metastatic cT1bRCC patients treated surgically and having !5 years potential follow-up were included (n = 2006). Patients gender, age, stage, tumor size, RCC type, local and distant tumor recurrence were evaluated.

Results: Among 2006 patients (1219 males, 787 females; mean age 66 years), 1705 underwent radical nephrectomy (RN), and 301 PN. Upstage from cT1b to pathological T3a occurred in 304 (15%) patients. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 318 (16%) patients, with higher rates in pT3a (25%) compared to pT1b (14%). There was no significant difference in disease recurrences observed between the surgical techniques. Factors associated with increased recurrence risk included age, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor size, while papillary and chromophobe RCCs were associated with decreased risk. Patients with pT3a RCC had a worse 5-year OS rate (67%) compared with pT1b (83%; P < .001, log-rank test). In adjusted analyses, age, tumor size, pT-stage, and pN- stage were associated with OS, while treatment with PN was non-inferior compared with RN (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI: 0.71-1.45, P = .431).

Conclusion: Patients with clinical T1b RCCs face a non-negligible risk for tumor upstaging, disease recurrence, and decreased OS. The adjusted analyses showed that PN was non-inferior to RN, supporting the recommendation to offer PN.

部分肾切除术是T1b肾细胞癌患者的主要选择吗——一项基于全国人群的研究
目的:临床T1期肾细胞癌(RCC)患者预后普遍较好。指南推荐部分肾切除术(PN),同样适用于cT1b rcc。尽管预后良好,但cT1b RCC患者的分期和复发风险仍然存在,对PN的偏好一直值得怀疑。临床和形态学变量和总生存率(OS)在一个国家的现实世界的人口特征。方法:纳入2005-2014年瑞典国家肾癌登记处的数据,其中包括手术治疗的非转移性cT1bRCC患者,并进行了5年的潜在随访(n = 2006)。评估患者的性别、年龄、分期、肿瘤大小、RCC类型、局部和远处肿瘤复发情况。结果:2006例患者中,男性1219例,女性787例;平均年龄66岁),1705例行根治性肾切除术(RN), 301例行肾切除术(PN)。304例(15%)患者从cT1b转为病理性T3a。318例(16%)患者被诊断为复发性疾病,pT3a(25%)高于pT1b(14%)。两种手术方法在疾病复发率上无显著差异。与复发风险增加相关的因素包括年龄、t期、n期和肿瘤大小,而乳头状和憎色型rcc与风险降低相关。pT3a RCC患者的5年OS率(67%)低于pT1b患者(83%;P < 0.001, log-rank检验)。在校正分析中,年龄、肿瘤大小、pt分期和pN分期与OS相关,而pN治疗与RN治疗相比并不差(风险比0.91,95% CI: 0.71-1.45, P = 0.431)。结论:临床T1b rcc患者在肿瘤晚期、疾病复发和OS降低方面存在不可忽视的风险。调整后的分析显示,PN不低于RN,支持提供PN的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信