{"title":"Efficacy of the bicarbonate dialysate with acetate concentrations of 0-0.3 and 3-5: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Takeshi Nakata, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Koshiro Kanaoka, Miyauchi Takamasa, Yoshinosuke Shimamura, Yasushi Tsujimoto","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acetic acid in dialysis fluid has been reported to induce symptomatic hypotension and post-dialysis fatigue. However, it remains unclear whether acetate-free dialysate improves these outcomes due to the lack of comprehensive evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of acetate-free dialysate with standard acetate-containing dialysate using randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and trial registries. Primary outcomes were fatigue, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included dropout rate due to adverse events, serum bicarbonate levels, and acid-base balance (pH) at the study's end. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 for crossover trials assessed the risk of bias, and we used a random effects model for meta-analyses, along with the GRADE approach to rate evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four randomized crossover trials involving 114 patients, all at high risk of bias due to period and carryover effects. The studies showed no significant impact on fatigue. Acetate-free dialysate may slightly reduce IDH (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04; I2 = 79%, across two studies with 5872 sessions) with low certainty of evidence. Results for secondary outcomes, including bicarbonate levels and pH, were inconclusive due to very low certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, no clear benefit was observed for acetate-free dialysate compared with dialysate containing low concentrations of acetate. Further studies are needed to definitively ascertain the benefits of low-acetate dialysates in hemodialysis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"609-619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Acetic acid in dialysis fluid has been reported to induce symptomatic hypotension and post-dialysis fatigue. However, it remains unclear whether acetate-free dialysate improves these outcomes due to the lack of comprehensive evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of acetate-free dialysate with standard acetate-containing dialysate using randomized controlled trials.
Method: We searched databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and trial registries. Primary outcomes were fatigue, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included dropout rate due to adverse events, serum bicarbonate levels, and acid-base balance (pH) at the study's end. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 for crossover trials assessed the risk of bias, and we used a random effects model for meta-analyses, along with the GRADE approach to rate evidence certainty.
Results: We identified four randomized crossover trials involving 114 patients, all at high risk of bias due to period and carryover effects. The studies showed no significant impact on fatigue. Acetate-free dialysate may slightly reduce IDH (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04; I2 = 79%, across two studies with 5872 sessions) with low certainty of evidence. Results for secondary outcomes, including bicarbonate levels and pH, were inconclusive due to very low certainty of evidence.
Conclusion: In conclusion, no clear benefit was observed for acetate-free dialysate compared with dialysate containing low concentrations of acetate. Further studies are needed to definitively ascertain the benefits of low-acetate dialysates in hemodialysis treatment.