Efficacy of the bicarbonate dialysate with acetate concentrations of 0-0.3 and 3-5: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2
Takeshi Nakata, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Koshiro Kanaoka, Miyauchi Takamasa, Yoshinosuke Shimamura, Yasushi Tsujimoto
{"title":"Efficacy of the bicarbonate dialysate with acetate concentrations of 0-0.3 and 3-5: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Takeshi Nakata, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Koshiro Kanaoka, Miyauchi Takamasa, Yoshinosuke Shimamura, Yasushi Tsujimoto","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acetic acid in dialysis fluid has been reported to induce symptomatic hypotension and post-dialysis fatigue. However, it remains unclear whether acetate-free dialysate improves these outcomes due to the lack of comprehensive evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of acetate-free dialysate with standard acetate-containing dialysate using randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and trial registries. Primary outcomes were fatigue, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included dropout rate due to adverse events, serum bicarbonate levels, and acid-base balance (pH) at the study's end. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 for crossover trials assessed the risk of bias, and we used a random effects model for meta-analyses, along with the GRADE approach to rate evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four randomized crossover trials involving 114 patients, all at high risk of bias due to period and carryover effects. The studies showed no significant impact on fatigue. Acetate-free dialysate may slightly reduce IDH (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04; I2 = 79%, across two studies with 5872 sessions) with low certainty of evidence. Results for secondary outcomes, including bicarbonate levels and pH, were inconclusive due to very low certainty of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, no clear benefit was observed for acetate-free dialysate compared with dialysate containing low concentrations of acetate. Further studies are needed to definitively ascertain the benefits of low-acetate dialysates in hemodialysis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94253,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"609-619"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acetic acid in dialysis fluid has been reported to induce symptomatic hypotension and post-dialysis fatigue. However, it remains unclear whether acetate-free dialysate improves these outcomes due to the lack of comprehensive evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of acetate-free dialysate with standard acetate-containing dialysate using randomized controlled trials.

Method: We searched databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and trial registries. Primary outcomes were fatigue, intradialytic hypotension (IDH), and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included dropout rate due to adverse events, serum bicarbonate levels, and acid-base balance (pH) at the study's end. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 for crossover trials assessed the risk of bias, and we used a random effects model for meta-analyses, along with the GRADE approach to rate evidence certainty.

Results: We identified four randomized crossover trials involving 114 patients, all at high risk of bias due to period and carryover effects. The studies showed no significant impact on fatigue. Acetate-free dialysate may slightly reduce IDH (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04; I2 = 79%, across two studies with 5872 sessions) with low certainty of evidence. Results for secondary outcomes, including bicarbonate levels and pH, were inconclusive due to very low certainty of evidence.

Conclusion: In conclusion, no clear benefit was observed for acetate-free dialysate compared with dialysate containing low concentrations of acetate. Further studies are needed to definitively ascertain the benefits of low-acetate dialysates in hemodialysis treatment.

醋酸盐浓度为0-0.3和3-5的碳酸氢盐透析液的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
导读:据报道,透析液中的醋酸可引起症状性低血压和透析后疲劳。然而,由于缺乏全面的证据,目前尚不清楚无醋酸酯透析液是否能改善这些结果。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在通过随机对照试验比较无醋酸酯透析液和标准含醋酸酯透析液的效果。方法:检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL和试验注册数据库。主要结局是疲劳、分析性低血压(IDH)和全因死亡率。次要结局包括不良事件导致的辍学率、血清碳酸氢盐水平和研究结束时的酸碱平衡(pH)。Cochrane偏倚风险工具2用于交叉试验评估偏倚风险,我们使用随机效应模型进行meta分析,并使用GRADE方法对证据确定性进行评分。结果:我们确定了4个随机交叉试验,涉及114例患者,由于期间和遗留效应,所有试验都存在高偏倚风险。研究显示对疲劳没有显著的影响。无醋酸酯透析液可能略微降低IDH (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.66 ~ 1.04;I2 = 79%(两项研究共5872次),证据确定性较低。次要结局的结果,包括碳酸氢盐水平和pH值,由于证据的确定性非常低,尚无定论。结论:与含低浓度乙酸的透析液相比,无乙酸透析液没有明显的益处。需要进一步的研究来明确地确定低乙酸透析液在血液透析治疗中的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信