Maintaining upright posture during perturbed standing in a motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis with powered ankle joints: A feasibility and proof-of-concept study.
Sandra K Hnat, Marshaun N Fitzpatrick, Musa L Audu, Ronald J Triolo, Roger D Quinn
{"title":"Maintaining upright posture during perturbed standing in a motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis with powered ankle joints: A feasibility and proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Sandra K Hnat, Marshaun N Fitzpatrick, Musa L Audu, Ronald J Triolo, Roger D Quinn","doi":"10.1177/20556683251335203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintaining balance during perturbations is essential for the effectiveness of exoskeletal assistive devices in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). We tested new ankle actuators in a muscles-first, motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis (MAHNP) to evaluate their ability to maintain upright posture under various perturbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with SCI (<i>n</i> = 2) performed standing balance tasks while wearing the MAHNP with and without ankle control, combined with electrical stimulation for one participant. A proportional, integral, derivative (PID) controller maintained 5° dorsiflexion based on input from an angle encoder. MAHNP's balance control mechanisms were evaluated by the center of pressure (CoP) excursion during unexpected perturbations for both participants, while hands-free standing, range-of-motion tasks, and functional reach tests were completed by one participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Active control provided important functional benefits by improving forward reach by 4.3 cm compared to no control, and extending hands-free standing time by 28.3% compared to no control. Additionally, variance in mediolateral CoP excursion was reduced from approximately 57% with no control to around 50% with control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that while PID-controlled ankle actuators perform well in quiet standing, further optimization may be required for tasks involving more dynamic movements and voluntary postural tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"20556683251335203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251335203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Maintaining balance during perturbations is essential for the effectiveness of exoskeletal assistive devices in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). We tested new ankle actuators in a muscles-first, motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis (MAHNP) to evaluate their ability to maintain upright posture under various perturbations.
Methods: Participants with SCI (n = 2) performed standing balance tasks while wearing the MAHNP with and without ankle control, combined with electrical stimulation for one participant. A proportional, integral, derivative (PID) controller maintained 5° dorsiflexion based on input from an angle encoder. MAHNP's balance control mechanisms were evaluated by the center of pressure (CoP) excursion during unexpected perturbations for both participants, while hands-free standing, range-of-motion tasks, and functional reach tests were completed by one participant.
Results: Active control provided important functional benefits by improving forward reach by 4.3 cm compared to no control, and extending hands-free standing time by 28.3% compared to no control. Additionally, variance in mediolateral CoP excursion was reduced from approximately 57% with no control to around 50% with control.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that while PID-controlled ankle actuators perform well in quiet standing, further optimization may be required for tasks involving more dynamic movements and voluntary postural tasks.