Maintaining upright posture during perturbed standing in a motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis with powered ankle joints: A feasibility and proof-of-concept study.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sandra K Hnat, Marshaun N Fitzpatrick, Musa L Audu, Ronald J Triolo, Roger D Quinn
{"title":"Maintaining upright posture during perturbed standing in a motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis with powered ankle joints: A feasibility and proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Sandra K Hnat, Marshaun N Fitzpatrick, Musa L Audu, Ronald J Triolo, Roger D Quinn","doi":"10.1177/20556683251335203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maintaining balance during perturbations is essential for the effectiveness of exoskeletal assistive devices in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). We tested new ankle actuators in a muscles-first, motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis (MAHNP) to evaluate their ability to maintain upright posture under various perturbations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with SCI (<i>n</i> = 2) performed standing balance tasks while wearing the MAHNP with and without ankle control, combined with electrical stimulation for one participant. A proportional, integral, derivative (PID) controller maintained 5° dorsiflexion based on input from an angle encoder. MAHNP's balance control mechanisms were evaluated by the center of pressure (CoP) excursion during unexpected perturbations for both participants, while hands-free standing, range-of-motion tasks, and functional reach tests were completed by one participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Active control provided important functional benefits by improving forward reach by 4.3 cm compared to no control, and extending hands-free standing time by 28.3% compared to no control. Additionally, variance in mediolateral CoP excursion was reduced from approximately 57% with no control to around 50% with control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that while PID-controlled ankle actuators perform well in quiet standing, further optimization may be required for tasks involving more dynamic movements and voluntary postural tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"12 ","pages":"20556683251335203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683251335203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maintaining balance during perturbations is essential for the effectiveness of exoskeletal assistive devices in individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI). We tested new ankle actuators in a muscles-first, motor-assisted hybrid neuroprosthesis (MAHNP) to evaluate their ability to maintain upright posture under various perturbations.

Methods: Participants with SCI (n = 2) performed standing balance tasks while wearing the MAHNP with and without ankle control, combined with electrical stimulation for one participant. A proportional, integral, derivative (PID) controller maintained 5° dorsiflexion based on input from an angle encoder. MAHNP's balance control mechanisms were evaluated by the center of pressure (CoP) excursion during unexpected perturbations for both participants, while hands-free standing, range-of-motion tasks, and functional reach tests were completed by one participant.

Results: Active control provided important functional benefits by improving forward reach by 4.3 cm compared to no control, and extending hands-free standing time by 28.3% compared to no control. Additionally, variance in mediolateral CoP excursion was reduced from approximately 57% with no control to around 50% with control.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that while PID-controlled ankle actuators perform well in quiet standing, further optimization may be required for tasks involving more dynamic movements and voluntary postural tasks.

在有动力踝关节的运动辅助混合神经假体中,在不安站立时保持直立姿势:可行性和概念验证研究。
简介:在干扰期间保持平衡对于脊髓损伤(SCI)个体的外骨骼辅助装置的有效性至关重要。我们在一个肌肉优先、运动辅助的混合神经假体(MAHNP)中测试了新的踝关节致动器,以评估它们在各种扰动下保持直立姿势的能力。方法:脊髓损伤患者(n = 2)在佩戴MAHNP(有或没有踝关节控制)并结合电刺激的情况下进行站立平衡任务。比例、积分、导数(PID)控制器根据角度编码器的输入保持5°背屈。MAHNP的平衡控制机制通过压力中心(CoP)漂移在意外扰动下对两名参与者进行评估,而自由站立、活动范围任务和功能到达测试由一名参与者完成。结果:与无控制相比,主动控制提高了4.3 cm的前伸,与无控制相比,延长了28.3%的免提站立时间,提供了重要的功能益处。此外,中外侧CoP偏移的方差从无对照组的约57%降至对照组的约50%。结论:这些研究结果表明,尽管pid控制的踝关节致动器在安静站立时表现良好,但对于涉及更多动态运动和自愿姿势任务的任务,可能需要进一步优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信