Decision-making Tools for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006710
Sara Sheikh-Oleslami, Lucas Rempel, Caroline F Illmann, Emma Nicholson, Kathryn V Isaac
{"title":"Decision-making Tools for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sara Sheikh-Oleslami, Lucas Rempel, Caroline F Illmann, Emma Nicholson, Kathryn V Isaac","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction is an essential consideration for patients with breast cancer undergoing a mastectomy. Patients commonly report inadequate education as an important cause of dissatisfaction with breast reconstructive care. Information sources for breast reconstruction vary in quality, accuracy, and validity. We sought to determine what academic and nonacademic resources exist supporting decision-making for patients undergoing breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search was conducted of both academic literature and nonacademic social media sources. Three academic databases and 5 social media platforms were searched using keywords. Three independent reviewers performed the selection and data extraction of sources that met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1172 academic articles and 1419 nonacademic records were screened, with 14 and 9 included for final review, respectively. Of the 5 nonacademic mediums searched, none were included from TikTok and Instagram. One decision-making tool (DMT) was included from Twitter, 4 from YouTube, and 4 from Google. Overall, the quality of available DMTs was very good. The one included academic DMT had a mean DISCERN score of 5, whereas the 4 DMTs from Google and Twitter had a median DISCERN score of 4. YouTube videos were ranked using the modified DISCERN tool with a median score of 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accessibility was found to be a significant barrier for patients in academic and nonacademic platforms with significant knowledge required to effectively search these platforms for resources. Efforts must be made to improve accessibility and awareness of these DMTs, as such tools are essential in shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6710"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction is an essential consideration for patients with breast cancer undergoing a mastectomy. Patients commonly report inadequate education as an important cause of dissatisfaction with breast reconstructive care. Information sources for breast reconstruction vary in quality, accuracy, and validity. We sought to determine what academic and nonacademic resources exist supporting decision-making for patients undergoing breast reconstruction.

Methods: A search was conducted of both academic literature and nonacademic social media sources. Three academic databases and 5 social media platforms were searched using keywords. Three independent reviewers performed the selection and data extraction of sources that met the inclusion criteria.

Results: A total of 1172 academic articles and 1419 nonacademic records were screened, with 14 and 9 included for final review, respectively. Of the 5 nonacademic mediums searched, none were included from TikTok and Instagram. One decision-making tool (DMT) was included from Twitter, 4 from YouTube, and 4 from Google. Overall, the quality of available DMTs was very good. The one included academic DMT had a mean DISCERN score of 5, whereas the 4 DMTs from Google and Twitter had a median DISCERN score of 4. YouTube videos were ranked using the modified DISCERN tool with a median score of 5.

Conclusions: Accessibility was found to be a significant barrier for patients in academic and nonacademic platforms with significant knowledge required to effectively search these platforms for resources. Efforts must be made to improve accessibility and awareness of these DMTs, as such tools are essential in shared decision-making.

乳房切除术后乳房重建的决策工具:范围回顾。
背景:乳房重建是接受乳房切除术的乳腺癌患者必须考虑的问题。患者通常报告教育不足是对乳房再造护理不满意的重要原因。乳房重建的信息来源在质量、准确性和有效性方面各不相同。我们试图确定存在哪些学术和非学术资源支持乳房重建患者的决策。方法:检索学术文献和非学术社交媒体来源。使用关键词检索了3个学术数据库和5个社交媒体平台。三名独立的审稿人对符合纳入标准的来源进行选择和数据提取。结果:共筛选学术文献1172篇,非学术文献1419篇,分别纳入最终审评14篇和9篇。在搜索的5种非学术媒体中,没有一种来自TikTok和Instagram。一个决策工具(DMT)来自Twitter, 4个来自YouTube, 4个来自谷歌。总的来说,可用的dmt的质量非常好。一个包括学术DMT的平均辨别得分为5,而来自谷歌和Twitter的4个DMT的辨别得分中位数为4。使用改进的DISCERN工具对YouTube视频进行排名,平均得分为5分。结论:无障碍被发现是患者在学术和非学术平台上有效搜索资源所需的重要知识的重要障碍。必须努力提高对这些dmt的可及性和认识,因为这些工具对共同决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信