Safety and efficacy of flexible articulated instrument (ArtiSential®) in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jong-Sung Ahn, Jesung Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Min-Jung Kim, Ji-Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu-Joo Park
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of flexible articulated instrument (ArtiSential<sup>®</sup>) in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.","authors":"Jong-Sung Ahn, Jesung Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Min-Jung Kim, Ji-Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu-Joo Park","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02841-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer remains challenging because of limited joint motion during dissection in the deep and narrow pelvis. Handheld multiarticulated instruments have been developed to address these limitations. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a flexible articulated instrument, the ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> (Livsmed Co, Korea), at reducing the duration of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic low or ultralow anterior resection for primary mid to low rectal cancer (tumor distance from anal verge, ≤ 10 cm) performed by a single surgeon in 2012-2022. Patients were divided into groups based on the use of ArtiSential<sup>®</sup> or straight device, and their clinical characteristics, surgical procedures, pathological findings, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 93 patients (articulating group, 32; straight group, 61). Low anterior resection was predominant in both groups, while operative time was significantly shorter in the articulating group (148.08 ± 49.72 vs. 188.13 ± 57.86; p = 0.003). Total mesorectal excision quality and resection margin status did not differ between groups. Postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage, length of hospital stay, 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (90.6% vs. 88.5%, p = 0.760), and overall survival rate (100% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.092), did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of the flexible articulated instrument (ArtiSential<sup>®</sup>) can reduce operative time without impairing surgical quality or oncologic outcomes. These results suggest that laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery can be performed safely and effectively using a flexible articulated instrument.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"192"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02841-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer remains challenging because of limited joint motion during dissection in the deep and narrow pelvis. Handheld multiarticulated instruments have been developed to address these limitations. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a flexible articulated instrument, the ArtiSential® (Livsmed Co, Korea), at reducing the duration of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Study design: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic low or ultralow anterior resection for primary mid to low rectal cancer (tumor distance from anal verge, ≤ 10 cm) performed by a single surgeon in 2012-2022. Patients were divided into groups based on the use of ArtiSential® or straight device, and their clinical characteristics, surgical procedures, pathological findings, postoperative complications, and survival outcomes were analyzed.

Results: The study included 93 patients (articulating group, 32; straight group, 61). Low anterior resection was predominant in both groups, while operative time was significantly shorter in the articulating group (148.08 ± 49.72 vs. 188.13 ± 57.86; p = 0.003). Total mesorectal excision quality and resection margin status did not differ between groups. Postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakage, length of hospital stay, 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (90.6% vs. 88.5%, p = 0.760), and overall survival rate (100% vs. 85.2%, p = 0.092), did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: Use of the flexible articulated instrument (ArtiSential®) can reduce operative time without impairing surgical quality or oncologic outcomes. These results suggest that laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery can be performed safely and effectively using a flexible articulated instrument.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

柔性关节器械(ArtiSential®)在直肠癌腹腔镜手术中的安全性和有效性。
背景:直肠癌腹腔镜手术仍然具有挑战性,因为在深骨盆和窄骨盆解剖时关节活动受限。手持式多关节仪器的开发就是为了解决这些限制。本研究旨在评估柔性关节器械ArtiSential®(Livsmed Co ., Korea)在减少腹腔镜直肠癌手术时间方面的安全性和有效性。研究设计:我们回顾性分析了2012-2022年由一名外科医生进行的原发性中低位直肠癌(肿瘤距离肛门边缘,≤10 cm)腹腔镜低位或超低低位前切除术的患者。根据使用artiential®或直管装置将患者分为两组,分析其临床特征、手术方式、病理表现、术后并发症和生存结果。结果:共纳入93例患者(发音组32例;直男组,61)。两组均以前低位切除为主,关节组手术时间明显缩短(148.08±49.72∶188.13±57.86;p = 0.003)。全肠系膜切除质量和切除边缘状态在两组间无差异。术后并发症,包括吻合口漏、住院时间、3年无复发生存率(90.6%比88.5%,p = 0.760)和总生存率(100%比85.2%,p = 0.092)在两组间无差异。结论:使用柔性关节器械(ArtiSential®)可以在不影响手术质量和肿瘤预后的情况下缩短手术时间。这些结果表明,使用灵活的关节器械可以安全有效地进行腹腔镜直肠癌手术。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信