Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with d2 lymphadenectomy in treatment of locally T4A gastric cancer: the protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Tran Quang Dat, Dang Quang Thong, Doan Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Viet Hai, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Nguyen Hoang Bac, Vo Duy Long
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with d2 lymphadenectomy in treatment of locally T4A gastric cancer: the protocol of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Tran Quang Dat, Dang Quang Thong, Doan Thuy Nguyen, Nguyen Viet Hai, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Nguyen Hoang Bac, Vo Duy Long","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02933-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been widely adopted for early and locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its safety and oncological efficacy in T4a GC remain unclear. To date, no randomized controlled trials have specifically examined the role of LG in the treatment of T4a GC. This study aims to provide robust evidence comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in resectable T4a GC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a phase III, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. Patients with clinical T4a GC (cT4aN0-3M0) suitable for distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either LDG or ODG. A total 240 patients (120 each group) are required to statistically show non-inferiority of the LDG with respect to the primary end-point, 3-years disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints include morbiity, mortality, postoperative recovery, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study is the first prospective randomized trial specifically designed to compare laparoscopic and open approaches for T4a GC. By standardizing surgical techniques and ensuring experienced surgeons perform the procedures, this trial aims to establish whether LDG can provide equivalent oncological outcomes while reducing perioperative morbidity and enhancing postoperative recovery. The findings will provide high-quality evidence to inform future guidelines and clinical decision-making in the management of T4a gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04384757), version 6. Registration Date: 08/05/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049068/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02933-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been widely adopted for early and locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC), its safety and oncological efficacy in T4a GC remain unclear. To date, no randomized controlled trials have specifically examined the role of LG in the treatment of T4a GC. This study aims to provide robust evidence comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in resectable T4a GC.

Methods: This is a phase III, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. Patients with clinical T4a GC (cT4aN0-3M0) suitable for distal gastrectomy with D2 dissection will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either LDG or ODG. A total 240 patients (120 each group) are required to statistically show non-inferiority of the LDG with respect to the primary end-point, 3-years disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints include morbiity, mortality, postoperative recovery, and quality of life.

Discussion: This study is the first prospective randomized trial specifically designed to compare laparoscopic and open approaches for T4a GC. By standardizing surgical techniques and ensuring experienced surgeons perform the procedures, this trial aims to establish whether LDG can provide equivalent oncological outcomes while reducing perioperative morbidity and enhancing postoperative recovery. The findings will provide high-quality evidence to inform future guidelines and clinical decision-making in the management of T4a gastric cancer.

Trial registration: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04384757), version 6. Registration Date: 08/05/2020.

腹腔镜与开放式远端胃切除术联合d2淋巴结切除术治疗局部T4A胃癌:一项随机对照试验方案。
背景:胃癌(GC)仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。虽然腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)已被广泛应用于早期和局部晚期胃癌(AGC),但其在T4a胃癌中的安全性和肿瘤学疗效尚不清楚。到目前为止,还没有随机对照试验专门研究LG在治疗T4a GC中的作用。本研究旨在提供有力的证据,比较腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)与开放式远端胃切除术(ODG)在可切除T4a胃癌中的短期和长期结果。方法:这是一项III期、随机对照、非劣效性试验。临床T4a GC (cT4aN0-3M0)患者适合远端胃切除术并D2夹层,将按1:1的比例随机分配进行LDG或ODG。总共需要240例患者(每组120例)来统计显示LDG相对于主要终点3年无病生存期(DFS)的非劣效性。次要终点包括发病率、死亡率、术后恢复和生活质量。讨论:这项研究是第一个专门设计的前瞻性随机试验,比较腹腔镜和开放入路治疗T4a GC。通过规范手术技术和确保经验丰富的外科医生执行手术,本试验旨在确定LDG是否能在降低围手术期发病率和提高术后恢复的同时提供同等的肿瘤结果。该发现将为T4a胃癌治疗的未来指南和临床决策提供高质量的证据。试验注册:本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04384757)注册,版本6。报名日期:2020年5月8日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信