Polar Life Pod Cooling Efficacy When Small Volumes of Water are Available to Treat Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-21 DOI:10.1177/10806032251332282
Kevin C Miller
{"title":"Polar Life Pod Cooling Efficacy When Small Volumes of Water are Available to Treat Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia.","authors":"Kevin C Miller","doi":"10.1177/10806032251332282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionCold-water immersion is the standard of care for treating exertional heatstroke (EHS). The Polar Life Pod (PLP; Polar Products Inc, Stow, OH), a body-bag-like device, is a novel, portable cold-water immersion device with excellent cooling rates (>0.18°C·min<sup>-1</sup>) when 151 to 208 L of water are used to treat hyperthermia. Unfortunately, these water volumes are not always available to treat EHS (eg, wilderness firefighting). Little research has examined whether the PLP with small water volumes meets expert recommendations for acceptable (ie, 0.08-0.15°C·min<sup>-1</sup>) or ideal cooling rates (ie, >0.16°C·min<sup>-1</sup>).MethodsThirty-two subjects (20 males and 12 females aged 21±2 y with a mass of 72.2±11.0 kg and a height of 170.4±7.2 cm) were assigned to 1 of 4 groups in this matched-pairs laboratory study. Participants wore a uniform and 9.5-kg rucksack and marched in the heat (wet-bulb globe temperature=26.1±0.1°C) until their rectal temperature (<i>T</i><sub>REC</sub>) was 39.5°C. Then they removed the uniform and sat in the heat (0 L) or lay in a PLP filled with 19, 38, or 76 L of ∼8°C water until <i>T</i><sub>REC</sub> was 38°C.ResultsBy design, all groups had comparable physical characteristics: body fat percentage (<i>P</i>=0.39), lean body mass (<i>P</i>=0.86), fat mass (<i>P</i>=0.13), body surface area (<i>P</i>=0.36), body surface area-lean body mass ratio (<i>P</i>=0.98), and body mass index (<i>P</i>=0.63). Subjects exercised for similar durations (<i>P</i>=0.66), and pre-immersion water temperatures were consistent between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). <i>T</i><sub>REC</sub> cooling rates differed (0 L=0.03±0.01°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, 19 L=0.13±0.08°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, 38 L=0.10±0.03°C·min<sup>-1</sup>, and 76 L=0.17±0.09°C·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i>=0.002). No cooling-rate differences occurred between 19, 38, and 76 L (<i>P</i><0.05).ConclusionPLP with 76 L met expert recommendations for ideal cooling rates; 19 and 38 L demonstrated acceptable cooling rates. PLP may help save lives from EHS when water access is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"342-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251332282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionCold-water immersion is the standard of care for treating exertional heatstroke (EHS). The Polar Life Pod (PLP; Polar Products Inc, Stow, OH), a body-bag-like device, is a novel, portable cold-water immersion device with excellent cooling rates (>0.18°C·min-1) when 151 to 208 L of water are used to treat hyperthermia. Unfortunately, these water volumes are not always available to treat EHS (eg, wilderness firefighting). Little research has examined whether the PLP with small water volumes meets expert recommendations for acceptable (ie, 0.08-0.15°C·min-1) or ideal cooling rates (ie, >0.16°C·min-1).MethodsThirty-two subjects (20 males and 12 females aged 21±2 y with a mass of 72.2±11.0 kg and a height of 170.4±7.2 cm) were assigned to 1 of 4 groups in this matched-pairs laboratory study. Participants wore a uniform and 9.5-kg rucksack and marched in the heat (wet-bulb globe temperature=26.1±0.1°C) until their rectal temperature (TREC) was 39.5°C. Then they removed the uniform and sat in the heat (0 L) or lay in a PLP filled with 19, 38, or 76 L of ∼8°C water until TREC was 38°C.ResultsBy design, all groups had comparable physical characteristics: body fat percentage (P=0.39), lean body mass (P=0.86), fat mass (P=0.13), body surface area (P=0.36), body surface area-lean body mass ratio (P=0.98), and body mass index (P=0.63). Subjects exercised for similar durations (P=0.66), and pre-immersion water temperatures were consistent between groups (P>0.05). TREC cooling rates differed (0 L=0.03±0.01°C·min-1, 19 L=0.13±0.08°C·min-1, 38 L=0.10±0.03°C·min-1, and 76 L=0.17±0.09°C·min-1; P=0.002). No cooling-rate differences occurred between 19, 38, and 76 L (P<0.05).ConclusionPLP with 76 L met expert recommendations for ideal cooling rates; 19 and 38 L demonstrated acceptable cooling rates. PLP may help save lives from EHS when water access is limited.

当少量水可用来治疗运动引起的热疗时,极地生命舱的冷却效果。
冷水浸泡是治疗劳累性中暑(EHS)的标准护理方法。极地生命舱(PLP;Polar Products Inc ., Stow, OH)是一种身体袋状装置,是一种新型的便携式冷水浸泡装置,当使用151至208升的水治疗高温时,具有出色的冷却速率(>.18°C·min-1)。不幸的是,这些水量并不总是可用于治疗EHS(例如,荒野消防)。很少有研究检查小水量的PLP是否符合专家建议的可接受(即0.08-0.15°C·min-1)或理想冷却速率(即> - 0.16°C·min-1)。方法32例男性20例,女性12例,年龄21±2岁,体重72.2±11.0 kg,身高170.4±7.2 cm,随机分为4组。参与者穿着制服,背着9.5公斤重的帆布背包,在高温(湿球温度=26.1±0.1°C)下行进,直到他们的直肠温度(TREC)达到39.5°C。然后,他们脱去制服,坐在高温(0 L)中,或躺在充满19、38或76 L ~ 8°C水的PLP中,直到TREC达到38°C。结果各组的体脂率(P=0.39)、瘦体质量(P=0.86)、脂肪质量(P=0.13)、体表面积(P=0.36)、体表面积与瘦体质量比(P=0.98)、体重指数(P=0.63)具有可比性。受试者运动时间相似(P=0.66),各组浸泡前水温一致(P < 0.05)。TREC冷却速率分别为0 L=0.03±0.01°C·min-1、19 L=0.13±0.08°C·min-1、38 L=0.10±0.03°C·min-1和76 L=0.17±0.09°C·min-1;P = 0.002)。19、38和76 L (P)之间没有冷却速率差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信