Yvonne Zurynski, Genevieve Dammery, Chrishan Nalliah, Simon Willcock, Catherine Smillie, Sanjyot Vagholkar, Walter Kmet, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Sue Barry, Deborah Pallavicini, Gilbert Knaggs, Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Chloe Zurynski, Francisco Lopez
{"title":"HeartConnect: Integrating primary care and specialist cardiology for rapid access and better patient and healthcare practitioner experiences.","authors":"Yvonne Zurynski, Genevieve Dammery, Chrishan Nalliah, Simon Willcock, Catherine Smillie, Sanjyot Vagholkar, Walter Kmet, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Sue Barry, Deborah Pallavicini, Gilbert Knaggs, Isabelle Meulenbroeks, Chloe Zurynski, Francisco Lopez","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-05-24-7251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study evaluates an innovative model of care, HeartConnect, which aims to improve timely access to specialist cardiology services and greater collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>HeartConnect was co-designed by GPs, cardiologists, researchers, patients and practice managers. A mixed-methods evaluation was performed. Details of referrals and HeartConnect appointments were collected. In total, 15 patients and six health providers were surveyed and/or interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five patients consented to the research (n=57 male; n=38 female; mean age 53.8 [standard deviation 19.5] years). Referrals were for review of symptoms (52%), clinical management (12%) and assessment of high-risk patients (10%). Patients were seen within two days if the appointment was made by the GP. In 91% of cases, follow-up letters were sent back to the GP on the same day. Analysis of survey and interview data showed that the model was considered acceptable.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>HeartConnect shows promise for reducing waiting times and enhancing collaboration between specialist cardiologists and GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 5","pages":"296-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-05-24-7251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: This study evaluates an innovative model of care, HeartConnect, which aims to improve timely access to specialist cardiology services and greater collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and cardiologists.
Method: HeartConnect was co-designed by GPs, cardiologists, researchers, patients and practice managers. A mixed-methods evaluation was performed. Details of referrals and HeartConnect appointments were collected. In total, 15 patients and six health providers were surveyed and/or interviewed.
Results: Ninety-five patients consented to the research (n=57 male; n=38 female; mean age 53.8 [standard deviation 19.5] years). Referrals were for review of symptoms (52%), clinical management (12%) and assessment of high-risk patients (10%). Patients were seen within two days if the appointment was made by the GP. In 91% of cases, follow-up letters were sent back to the GP on the same day. Analysis of survey and interview data showed that the model was considered acceptable.
Discussion: HeartConnect shows promise for reducing waiting times and enhancing collaboration between specialist cardiologists and GPs.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.