Identifying Alcohol Use Disorder and Problem Use in Adult Primary Care Patients: Comparison of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication and Other Substance (TAPS) Tool With the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption Items (AUDIT-C).

Angéline Adam, Eugene Laska, Robert P Schwartz, Li-Tzy Wu, Geetha A Subramaniam, Noa Appleton, Jennifer McNeely
{"title":"Identifying Alcohol Use Disorder and Problem Use in Adult Primary Care Patients: Comparison of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication and Other Substance (TAPS) Tool With the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption Items (AUDIT-C).","authors":"Angéline Adam, Eugene Laska, Robert P Schwartz, Li-Tzy Wu, Geetha A Subramaniam, Noa Appleton, Jennifer McNeely","doi":"10.1177/29767342251326678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication, and Other Substance (TAPS) tool is a screening and brief assessment instrument to identify unhealthy tobacco, alcohol, drug use, and prescription medication use in primary care patients. This secondary analysis compares the TAPS tool to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) for alcohol screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult primary care patients (1124 female, 874 male) completed the TAPS tool followed by AUDIT-C. Performance of each instrument was evaluated against a reference standard measure, the modified World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview, to identify problem use and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Area under the curve (AUC) appraised discrimination, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for Youden optimal score thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For identifying problem use: On the AUDIT-C, AUC was 0.90 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.86-0.92) for females and 0.91 (0.89-0.93) for males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.89 (0.83-0.93) and 0.78 (0.75-0.80), respectively, and for males were 0.84 (0.79-0.88) and 0.82 (0.79-0.85). On the TAPS tool, AUC was 0.82 (0.79-0.86) for females and 0.81 (0.78-0.84) for males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.78 (0.72-0.84) and 0.78 (0.75-0.81), respectively, and for males were 0.76 (0.71-0.81) and 0.76 (0.72-0.79). For AUD: On the AUDIT-C, AUC was 0.90 (0.88-0.93) for both females and males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.83 (0.74-0.90) and 0.83 (0.80-0.85), respectively, while for males, they were 0.81 (0.74-0.87) and 0.84 (0.81-0.87). On the TAPS tool, AUC was 0.84 (0.80-0.89) for females and 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.73 (0.63-0.81) and 0.85 (0.83-0.88), respectively, while for males, they were 0.75 (0.68-0.81) and 0.84 (0.81-0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AUDIT-C performed somewhat better than the TAPS tool for alcohol screening. However, the TAPS tool had an acceptable level of performance for alcohol screening and may be advantageous in practice settings seeking to identify alcohol and other substance use with a single instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":516535,"journal":{"name":"Substance use & addiction journal","volume":" ","pages":"29767342251326678"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance use & addiction journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/29767342251326678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medication, and Other Substance (TAPS) tool is a screening and brief assessment instrument to identify unhealthy tobacco, alcohol, drug use, and prescription medication use in primary care patients. This secondary analysis compares the TAPS tool to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) for alcohol screening.

Methods: Adult primary care patients (1124 female, 874 male) completed the TAPS tool followed by AUDIT-C. Performance of each instrument was evaluated against a reference standard measure, the modified World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview, to identify problem use and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Area under the curve (AUC) appraised discrimination, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated for Youden optimal score thresholds.

Results: For identifying problem use: On the AUDIT-C, AUC was 0.90 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.86-0.92) for females and 0.91 (0.89-0.93) for males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.89 (0.83-0.93) and 0.78 (0.75-0.80), respectively, and for males were 0.84 (0.79-0.88) and 0.82 (0.79-0.85). On the TAPS tool, AUC was 0.82 (0.79-0.86) for females and 0.81 (0.78-0.84) for males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.78 (0.72-0.84) and 0.78 (0.75-0.81), respectively, and for males were 0.76 (0.71-0.81) and 0.76 (0.72-0.79). For AUD: On the AUDIT-C, AUC was 0.90 (0.88-0.93) for both females and males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.83 (0.74-0.90) and 0.83 (0.80-0.85), respectively, while for males, they were 0.81 (0.74-0.87) and 0.84 (0.81-0.87). On the TAPS tool, AUC was 0.84 (0.80-0.89) for females and 0.82 (0.78-0.86) for males. Sensitivity and specificity for females were 0.73 (0.63-0.81) and 0.85 (0.83-0.88), respectively, while for males, they were 0.75 (0.68-0.81) and 0.84 (0.81-0.86).

Conclusion: The AUDIT-C performed somewhat better than the TAPS tool for alcohol screening. However, the TAPS tool had an acceptable level of performance for alcohol screening and may be advantageous in practice settings seeking to identify alcohol and other substance use with a single instrument.

识别成人初级保健患者的酒精使用障碍和问题使用:烟草、酒精、处方药和其他物质(TAPS)工具与酒精使用障碍识别测试消费项目(AUDIT-C)的比较
背景:烟草、酒精、处方药和其他物质(TAPS)工具是一种筛查和简短评估工具,用于识别初级保健患者中不健康的烟草、酒精、药物使用和处方药使用。这一次要分析将TAPS工具与酒精使用障碍识别测试-消费(AUDIT-C)进行了比较。方法:成年初级保健患者(女性1124例,男性874例)完成了TAPS工具,然后进行了AUDIT-C。每个仪器的性能根据参考标准措施进行评估,即修改后的世界精神卫生综合国际诊断访谈,以确定问题使用和酒精使用障碍(AUD)。曲线下面积(AUC)评价辨别性,并计算优登最佳评分阈值的敏感性和特异性。结果:对于识别问题使用:在AUDIT-C上,女性的AUC为0.90(95%置信区间:0.86-0.92),男性为0.91(0.89-0.93)。女性的敏感性和特异性分别为0.89(0.83-0.93)和0.78(0.75-0.80),男性为0.84(0.79-0.88)和0.82(0.79-0.85)。在TAPS工具上,女性的AUC为0.82(0.79-0.86),男性为0.81(0.78-0.84)。女性的敏感性和特异性分别为0.78(0.72-0.84)和0.78(0.75-0.81),男性为0.76(0.71-0.81)和0.76(0.72-0.79)。AUD:在AUDIT-C上,女性和男性的AUC均为0.90(0.88-0.93)。女性的敏感性和特异性分别为0.83(0.74-0.90)和0.83(0.80-0.85),男性的敏感性和特异性分别为0.81(0.74-0.87)和0.84(0.81-0.87)。在TAPS工具上,女性的AUC为0.84(0.80-0.89),男性为0.82(0.78-0.86)。女性敏感性为0.73(0.63-0.81),特异性为0.85(0.83-0.88),男性敏感性为0.75(0.68-0.81),特异性为0.84(0.81-0.86)。结论:AUDIT-C在酒精筛查方面优于TAPS工具。然而,TAPS工具在酒精筛查方面具有可接受的性能水平,并且在寻求用单一仪器识别酒精和其他物质使用的实践环境中可能是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信