Correlates of Processing Speed Change With Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exercise in Progressive MS: Secondary Analysis of the CogEx Trial.

Brian M Sandroff, Robert W Motl, Roberto S Hernandez, Maria Pia Amato, Giampaolo Brichetto, Jeremy Chataway, Nancy D Chiaravalloti, Gary R Cutter, Ulrik Dalgas, John DeLuca, Rachel Farrell, Peter Feys, Massimo Filippi, Jennifer Freeman, Matilde Inglese, Cecilia Meza, Maria A Rocca, Amber Salter, Anthony Feinstein
{"title":"Correlates of Processing Speed Change With Combined Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exercise in Progressive MS: Secondary Analysis of the CogEx Trial.","authors":"Brian M Sandroff, Robert W Motl, Roberto S Hernandez, Maria Pia Amato, Giampaolo Brichetto, Jeremy Chataway, Nancy D Chiaravalloti, Gary R Cutter, Ulrik Dalgas, John DeLuca, Rachel Farrell, Peter Feys, Massimo Filippi, Jennifer Freeman, Matilde Inglese, Cecilia Meza, Maria A Rocca, Amber Salter, Anthony Feinstein","doi":"10.1177/15459683251331586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCognitive rehabilitation and exercise training are promising approaches for improving cognition in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Identifying heterogeneity of change and factors that influence the effects of cognitive rehabilitation and/or exercise training on cognitive outcomes at the individual level have direct relevance for developing tailored and optimized rehabilitation interventions for improving cognition in progressive MS.ObjectiveThis study involved a secondary data analysis from the CogEx trial in progressive MS. This study first described heterogeneity of change in cognitive processing speed (CPS) across the intervention conditions and then identified possible adherence/compliance, baseline performance, and demographic/clinical variables as correlates of rehabilitation-related CPS changes.MethodsA total of 311 persons with progressive MS who were pre-screened for impaired CPS completed 12 weeks of combined cognitive rehabilitation (or sham) and exercise training (or sham). CPS was measured before and after the 12-week period. As potential correlates of CPS changes, we measured adherence/compliance (ie, treatment exposure), performance outcomes at baseline, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline.ResultsThere was heterogeneity of change in CPS across the 4 intervention conditions. We further identified baseline learning and memory impairment and premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ), but not adherence/compliance, other baseline performance outcomes, or demographic/clinical characteristics as significant correlates of CPS changes across the 4 intervention conditions.ConclusionsThe overall pattern of results suggests that future trials in this area might account for impaired learning and memory and/or premorbid IQ as potential covariates, or more carefully consider the role of reserve within rehabilitation interventions in progressive MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"15459683251331586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251331586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCognitive rehabilitation and exercise training are promising approaches for improving cognition in persons with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Identifying heterogeneity of change and factors that influence the effects of cognitive rehabilitation and/or exercise training on cognitive outcomes at the individual level have direct relevance for developing tailored and optimized rehabilitation interventions for improving cognition in progressive MS.ObjectiveThis study involved a secondary data analysis from the CogEx trial in progressive MS. This study first described heterogeneity of change in cognitive processing speed (CPS) across the intervention conditions and then identified possible adherence/compliance, baseline performance, and demographic/clinical variables as correlates of rehabilitation-related CPS changes.MethodsA total of 311 persons with progressive MS who were pre-screened for impaired CPS completed 12 weeks of combined cognitive rehabilitation (or sham) and exercise training (or sham). CPS was measured before and after the 12-week period. As potential correlates of CPS changes, we measured adherence/compliance (ie, treatment exposure), performance outcomes at baseline, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline.ResultsThere was heterogeneity of change in CPS across the 4 intervention conditions. We further identified baseline learning and memory impairment and premorbid intelligence quotient (IQ), but not adherence/compliance, other baseline performance outcomes, or demographic/clinical characteristics as significant correlates of CPS changes across the 4 intervention conditions.ConclusionsThe overall pattern of results suggests that future trials in this area might account for impaired learning and memory and/or premorbid IQ as potential covariates, or more carefully consider the role of reserve within rehabilitation interventions in progressive MS.

进行性多发性硬化症中加工速度变化与认知康复和运动的相关性:CogEx试验的二次分析。
认知康复和运动训练是改善进行性多发性硬化症(MS)患者认知能力的有希望的方法。在个体水平上识别影响认知康复和/或运动训练对认知结果影响的变化的异质性和因素,与开发量身定制和优化的康复干预措施以改善进行性多发性硬化症的认知有直接关系。目的:本研究涉及CogEx试验在进行性多发性硬化症中的二次数据分析干预条件,然后确定可能的依从性/依从性,基线表现和人口统计学/临床变量作为康复相关CPS变化的相关因素。方法共有311名进行性MS患者,他们被预先筛选为CPS受损,完成了12周的联合认知康复(或假)和运动训练(或假)。在12周前后测量CPS。作为CPS变化的潜在相关因素,我们测量了依从性/依从性(即治疗暴露)、基线时的表现结果以及基线时的人口统计学和临床特征。结果4种干预条件下CPS的变化存在异质性。我们进一步确定了基线学习和记忆障碍和病前智商(IQ),但没有确定依从性/依从性、其他基线表现结果或人口统计学/临床特征是4种干预条件下CPS变化的重要相关因素。总的结果模式表明,该领域的未来试验可能会考虑到学习记忆障碍和/或发病前智商作为潜在的协变量,或者更仔细地考虑储备在进展性MS康复干预中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信