Predictors of metachronous advanced colorectal adenoma after polypectomy.

IF 2.4
Tsan-Hsuan Chang, Lee-Won Chong, Hung-Chuen Chang, Yu-Hwa Liu, Cheuk-Kay Sun, Kou-Ching Yang, Yu-Min Lin
{"title":"Predictors of metachronous advanced colorectal adenoma after polypectomy.","authors":"Tsan-Hsuan Chang, Lee-Won Chong, Hung-Chuen Chang, Yu-Hwa Liu, Cheuk-Kay Sun, Kou-Ching Yang, Yu-Min Lin","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adenoma recurrence following polypectomy remains a major clinical concern, necessitating the optimization of risk assessment strategies. This study explored key risk factors for metachronous advanced adenomas, focusing on metabolic factors and initial colonoscopic findings, to offer recommendations regarding risk stratification and surveillance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included individuals who had undergone two colonoscopies between January 2014 and February 2020, with adenomas detected during the initial examination. The associations of various factors-such as age, sex, metabolic disorders, and baseline colonoscopic findings-with metachronous advanced adenomas were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 33 073 individuals who underwent baseline colonoscopy, 2013 met the eligibility criteria. Multivariate analysis indicated that age of ≥45 years, male sex, and baseline colonoscopic findings were key predictors of metachronous advanced adenomas. The adjusted odds ratio (OR; 95% CI) values for metachronous advanced adenomas in patients with multiple (≥3) diminutive adenomas, those with multiple (≥3) small adenomas, and those with advanced adenomas were 1.56 (95% CI, 0.87-2.80), 3.27 (95% CI, 2.02-5.29), and 5.41 (95% CI, 3.73-7.83), respectively, compared with the results in patients with one or two nonadvanced adenomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of baseline colonoscopy in identifying patients at elevated risk of developing metachronous advanced adenomas, particularly advanced adenomas. On the basis of our findings, we recommend integrating risk stratification by adenoma size, number, and histology into postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines. Personalized surveillance intervals informed by baseline findings and patient-specific risk factors may help clinicians optimize follow-up strategies and improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"538-544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adenoma recurrence following polypectomy remains a major clinical concern, necessitating the optimization of risk assessment strategies. This study explored key risk factors for metachronous advanced adenomas, focusing on metabolic factors and initial colonoscopic findings, to offer recommendations regarding risk stratification and surveillance.

Methods: This retrospective study included individuals who had undergone two colonoscopies between January 2014 and February 2020, with adenomas detected during the initial examination. The associations of various factors-such as age, sex, metabolic disorders, and baseline colonoscopic findings-with metachronous advanced adenomas were investigated.

Results: Of 33 073 individuals who underwent baseline colonoscopy, 2013 met the eligibility criteria. Multivariate analysis indicated that age of ≥45 years, male sex, and baseline colonoscopic findings were key predictors of metachronous advanced adenomas. The adjusted odds ratio (OR; 95% CI) values for metachronous advanced adenomas in patients with multiple (≥3) diminutive adenomas, those with multiple (≥3) small adenomas, and those with advanced adenomas were 1.56 (95% CI, 0.87-2.80), 3.27 (95% CI, 2.02-5.29), and 5.41 (95% CI, 3.73-7.83), respectively, compared with the results in patients with one or two nonadvanced adenomas.

Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of baseline colonoscopy in identifying patients at elevated risk of developing metachronous advanced adenomas, particularly advanced adenomas. On the basis of our findings, we recommend integrating risk stratification by adenoma size, number, and histology into postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines. Personalized surveillance intervals informed by baseline findings and patient-specific risk factors may help clinicians optimize follow-up strategies and improve clinical outcomes.

息肉切除术后异时性晚期结直肠腺瘤的预测因素。
背景:息肉切除术后腺瘤复发仍然是临床关注的主要问题,需要优化风险评估策略。本研究探讨了异时性晚期腺瘤的关键危险因素,重点关注代谢因素和初始结肠镜检查结果,为风险分层和监测提供建议。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2020年2月期间接受2次结肠镜检查并在初次检查中发现腺瘤的患者。研究了不同因素(如年龄、性别、代谢紊乱和基线结肠镜检查结果)与异时性晚期腺瘤的关系。结果:在接受基线结肠镜检查的33073例患者中,有2013例符合入选标准。多因素分析表明,年龄≥45岁、男性和基线结肠镜检查结果是异时性晚期腺瘤的关键预测因素。与1个或2个非晚期腺瘤患者相比,异时性晚期腺瘤合并多个(≥3个)小腺瘤患者、合并多个(≥3个)小腺瘤患者和晚期腺瘤患者的调整OR (95% CI)值分别为1.56 (95% CI: 0.87至2.80)、3.27 (95% CI: 2.02至5.29)和5.41 (95% CI: 3.73至7.83)。结论:本研究强调了基线结肠镜检查在识别异时性晚期腺瘤,特别是晚期腺瘤高风险患者中的重要性。基于我们的研究结果,我们建议将腺瘤大小、数量和组织学的风险分层纳入息肉切除术后的监测指南。根据基线发现和患者特定的风险因素,个性化的监测间隔可以帮助临床医生优化随访策略,改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信