The efficacy of telephone follow-up frequencies on clinical parameters post non-surgical periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2025-04-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1568252
Yinghui He, Feng Tang, Ruoyi Liao, Chun Hu, Hongyu Liu
{"title":"The efficacy of telephone follow-up frequencies on clinical parameters post non-surgical periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yinghui He, Feng Tang, Ruoyi Liao, Chun Hu, Hongyu Liu","doi":"10.3389/froh.2025.1568252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the impact of different telephone follow-up frequencies on periodontal clinical parameters after non-surgical periodontal therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with Stage II-IV periodontitis were enrolled and randomly assigned to high-frequency (once every 2 weeks), medium-frequency (once a month), and low-frequency (once in 3 months) follow-up groups. All patients received standard non-surgical periodontal treatment. The full mouth probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI) were evaluated at baseline, after treatment (T1) and post treatment 3 months (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From T1 to T2, the high-frequency follow-up group had significant reduced in PD (<i>p</i> = 0.03), improved in GI (<i>p</i> = 0.04) and PI (<i>p</i> = 0.03) compared with the medium and low-frequency groups. There was no significant difference in PD, GI, and PI between the medium-frequency group and the low-frequency group. No statistical difference was found in CAL among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More frequent telephone follow-up helps maintain and enhance non-surgical periodontal therapy effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1568252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12018391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1568252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the impact of different telephone follow-up frequencies on periodontal clinical parameters after non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Materials and methods: Patients with Stage II-IV periodontitis were enrolled and randomly assigned to high-frequency (once every 2 weeks), medium-frequency (once a month), and low-frequency (once in 3 months) follow-up groups. All patients received standard non-surgical periodontal treatment. The full mouth probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival index (GI), and plaque index (PI) were evaluated at baseline, after treatment (T1) and post treatment 3 months (T2).

Results: From T1 to T2, the high-frequency follow-up group had significant reduced in PD (p = 0.03), improved in GI (p = 0.04) and PI (p = 0.03) compared with the medium and low-frequency groups. There was no significant difference in PD, GI, and PI between the medium-frequency group and the low-frequency group. No statistical difference was found in CAL among the three groups.

Conclusion: More frequent telephone follow-up helps maintain and enhance non-surgical periodontal therapy effects.

电话随访频率对牙周非手术治疗后临床参数的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本随机对照试验旨在探讨不同电话随访频率对牙周非手术治疗后牙周临床参数的影响。材料与方法:将II-IV期牙周炎患者随机分为高频(每2周1次)、中频(每月1次)和低频(每3个月1次)随访组。所有患者均接受标准的非手术牙周治疗。在基线、治疗后(T1)和治疗后3个月(T2)评估全口探查深度(PD)、临床附着损失(CAL)、牙龈指数(GI)和菌斑指数(PI)。结果:与中、低频随访组相比,T1 ~ T2高频随访组PD显著降低(p = 0.03), GI显著改善(p = 0.04), PI显著改善(p = 0.03)。中频组与低频组PD、GI、PI差异无统计学意义。三组间CAL差异无统计学意义。结论:频繁的电话随访有助于维持和提高非手术牙周治疗的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信