{"title":"Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Retrospective Pilot Study of Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Omar Viswanath, Vwaire Orhurhu, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.52965/001c.134102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used to manage lumbosacral radicular pain and axial low back pain. While they are generally considered safe, real-world data on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and short-term effectiveness of caudal ESIs by reviewing a series of randomly selected cases performed over a six-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 40 randomly selected caudal ESI procedures performed between July 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a corticosteroid mixed with local anesthetic and preservative-free normal saline. Charts were reviewed for procedural complications, including dural puncture, neurological injury, and infection. Outcome data, including starting and post-injection pain scores and patient-reported percent relief, were analyzed in patients with complete follow-up at two weeks or by post-procedure phone call.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no documented dural puncture, infection, or permanent neurological injury among the 40 cases. Of the 27 patients with complete follow-up data, the average pain score decreased from 8.6 to 2.9 on the numerical rating scale. The average patient-reported percent relief was 67.4%. A total of 24 patients (88.9%) reported at least 50% relief, 3 patients (11.1%) reported complete (100%) relief, and only 1 patient reported no relief (0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caudal ESIs demonstrated a favorable safety profile and were associated with meaningful short-term pain relief in most patients. These findings support the continued use of caudal ESIs as a safe and effective interventional option for appropriately selected patients with lumbosacral pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"134102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.134102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used to manage lumbosacral radicular pain and axial low back pain. While they are generally considered safe, real-world data on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and short-term effectiveness of caudal ESIs by reviewing a series of randomly selected cases performed over a six-month period.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 40 randomly selected caudal ESI procedures performed between July 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a corticosteroid mixed with local anesthetic and preservative-free normal saline. Charts were reviewed for procedural complications, including dural puncture, neurological injury, and infection. Outcome data, including starting and post-injection pain scores and patient-reported percent relief, were analyzed in patients with complete follow-up at two weeks or by post-procedure phone call.
Results: There were no documented dural puncture, infection, or permanent neurological injury among the 40 cases. Of the 27 patients with complete follow-up data, the average pain score decreased from 8.6 to 2.9 on the numerical rating scale. The average patient-reported percent relief was 67.4%. A total of 24 patients (88.9%) reported at least 50% relief, 3 patients (11.1%) reported complete (100%) relief, and only 1 patient reported no relief (0%).
Conclusion: Caudal ESIs demonstrated a favorable safety profile and were associated with meaningful short-term pain relief in most patients. These findings support the continued use of caudal ESIs as a safe and effective interventional option for appropriately selected patients with lumbosacral pain.
期刊介绍:
Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.