Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Retrospective Pilot Study of Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-04-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.134102
Jamal Hasoon, Omar Viswanath, Vwaire Orhurhu, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
{"title":"Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Retrospective Pilot Study of Safety and Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Omar Viswanath, Vwaire Orhurhu, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.52965/001c.134102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used to manage lumbosacral radicular pain and axial low back pain. While they are generally considered safe, real-world data on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and short-term effectiveness of caudal ESIs by reviewing a series of randomly selected cases performed over a six-month period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 40 randomly selected caudal ESI procedures performed between July 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a corticosteroid mixed with local anesthetic and preservative-free normal saline. Charts were reviewed for procedural complications, including dural puncture, neurological injury, and infection. Outcome data, including starting and post-injection pain scores and patient-reported percent relief, were analyzed in patients with complete follow-up at two weeks or by post-procedure phone call.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no documented dural puncture, infection, or permanent neurological injury among the 40 cases. Of the 27 patients with complete follow-up data, the average pain score decreased from 8.6 to 2.9 on the numerical rating scale. The average patient-reported percent relief was 67.4%. A total of 24 patients (88.9%) reported at least 50% relief, 3 patients (11.1%) reported complete (100%) relief, and only 1 patient reported no relief (0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caudal ESIs demonstrated a favorable safety profile and were associated with meaningful short-term pain relief in most patients. These findings support the continued use of caudal ESIs as a safe and effective interventional option for appropriately selected patients with lumbosacral pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"134102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.134102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used to manage lumbosacral radicular pain and axial low back pain. While they are generally considered safe, real-world data on complication rates and patient-reported outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and short-term effectiveness of caudal ESIs by reviewing a series of randomly selected cases performed over a six-month period.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 40 randomly selected caudal ESI procedures performed between July 1, 2024, and December 31, 2024. All procedures were performed under fluoroscopic guidance using a corticosteroid mixed with local anesthetic and preservative-free normal saline. Charts were reviewed for procedural complications, including dural puncture, neurological injury, and infection. Outcome data, including starting and post-injection pain scores and patient-reported percent relief, were analyzed in patients with complete follow-up at two weeks or by post-procedure phone call.

Results: There were no documented dural puncture, infection, or permanent neurological injury among the 40 cases. Of the 27 patients with complete follow-up data, the average pain score decreased from 8.6 to 2.9 on the numerical rating scale. The average patient-reported percent relief was 67.4%. A total of 24 patients (88.9%) reported at least 50% relief, 3 patients (11.1%) reported complete (100%) relief, and only 1 patient reported no relief (0%).

Conclusion: Caudal ESIs demonstrated a favorable safety profile and were associated with meaningful short-term pain relief in most patients. These findings support the continued use of caudal ESIs as a safe and effective interventional option for appropriately selected patients with lumbosacral pain.

尾侧硬膜外类固醇注射:安全性和患者报告结果的回顾性初步研究。
背景:尾侧硬膜外类固醇注射(ESIs)通常用于治疗腰骶神经根性疼痛和轴性下腰痛。虽然它们通常被认为是安全的,但关于并发症发生率和患者报告的结果的真实数据仍然有限。本研究旨在通过回顾一系列随机选择的病例,在六个月的时间内评估尾侧穿刺的安全性和短期有效性。方法:对2024年7月1日至2024年12月31日期间随机选取的40例尾侧ESI手术进行回顾性分析。所有手术均在透视指导下进行,使用皮质类固醇混合局部麻醉剂和不含防腐剂的生理盐水。我们回顾了手术并发症的图表,包括硬脑膜穿刺、神经损伤和感染。结果数据,包括开始和注射后疼痛评分和患者报告的缓解百分比,在两周的完全随访或手术后电话中进行分析。结果:40例患者无硬脑膜穿刺、感染或永久性神经损伤。随访资料完整的27例患者中,平均疼痛评分从8.6降至2.9。患者报告的平均缓解率为67.4%。共有24例患者(88.9%)报告至少缓解50%,3例患者(11.1%)报告完全缓解(100%),只有1例患者报告无缓解(0%)。结论:在大多数患者中,尾侧穿刺具有良好的安全性,并与有意义的短期疼痛缓解相关。这些发现支持继续使用尾侧穿刺作为一种安全有效的介入治疗选择,用于适当选择的腰骶痛患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信