Methadone to treat chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (METACIN): study protocol.

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mathieos Belayneh, Samar Hejazi, Bruno Gagnon, Philippa Hawley
{"title":"Methadone to treat chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (METACIN): study protocol.","authors":"Mathieos Belayneh, Samar Hejazi, Bruno Gagnon, Philippa Hawley","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2494495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects 70% of cancer patients, causing neuropathic pain. Duloxetine is the most recommended treatment for CIPN per most guidelines. However, Methadone, an alternative and effective treatment for refractory neuropathic cancer pain has been under-recognized and under-studied in patients with CIPN.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients with cancer and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks who have >grade 1 CIPN based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 grading scale lasting ≥3 months beyond chemotherapy completion.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A triple-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled trial, participants randomized to either methadone or duloxetine, followed weekly over 5 weeks with dose titration.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Primary outcome is the efficacy of methadone versus duloxetine in reducing average pain intensity from baseline to study end. Secondary outcomes include improvements in functional and quality-of-life interference. Exploratory outcomes include proportion of participants achieving ≥30% or ≥50% pain reduction, patient-reported global impression of change, incidence of adverse events, and methadone dose escalation over a 24-week follow up period.</p><p><strong>Anticipated impact: </strong>This study will determine if methadone is a viable treatment for CIPN; a very common, distressing, and debilitating condition that otherwise has limited treatment options.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05786599.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2494495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Chronic chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects 70% of cancer patients, causing neuropathic pain. Duloxetine is the most recommended treatment for CIPN per most guidelines. However, Methadone, an alternative and effective treatment for refractory neuropathic cancer pain has been under-recognized and under-studied in patients with CIPN.

Participants: Adult patients with cancer and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks who have >grade 1 CIPN based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 grading scale lasting ≥3 months beyond chemotherapy completion.

Intervention: A triple-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled trial, participants randomized to either methadone or duloxetine, followed weekly over 5 weeks with dose titration.

Outcomes: Primary outcome is the efficacy of methadone versus duloxetine in reducing average pain intensity from baseline to study end. Secondary outcomes include improvements in functional and quality-of-life interference. Exploratory outcomes include proportion of participants achieving ≥30% or ≥50% pain reduction, patient-reported global impression of change, incidence of adverse events, and methadone dose escalation over a 24-week follow up period.

Anticipated impact: This study will determine if methadone is a viable treatment for CIPN; a very common, distressing, and debilitating condition that otherwise has limited treatment options.

Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05786599.

美沙酮治疗化疗诱导的周围神经病变(METACIN):研究方案。
理由:慢性化疗诱导的周围神经病变(CIPN)影响70%的癌症患者,引起神经性疼痛。根据大多数指南,度洛西汀是CIPN最推荐的治疗方法。然而,美沙酮作为一种治疗难治性神经性癌性疼痛的有效替代疗法,在CIPN患者中尚未得到充分的认识和研究。参与者:成年癌症患者,预期寿命大于12周,根据美国国家癌症研究所不良事件共同毒性标准5.0版分级量表,CIPN为>级,持续≥3个月化疗结束后。干预:一项三盲、双虚拟随机对照试验,参与者随机接受美沙酮或度洛西汀治疗,每周进行剂量滴定,持续5周。结果:主要结果是美沙酮与度洛西汀从基线到研究结束时降低平均疼痛强度的疗效。次要结果包括功能和生活质量干扰的改善。探索性结果包括受试者疼痛减轻≥30%或≥50%的比例、患者报告的总体印象变化、不良事件发生率以及24周随访期间美沙酮剂量的增加。预期影响:本研究将确定美沙酮是否是CIPN的可行治疗方法;这是一种非常常见的、令人痛苦的、使人虚弱的疾病,否则治疗选择有限。临床试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT05786599。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信