Evaluating Nurses' Perceptions of Documentation in the Electronic Health Record: Multimethod Analysis.

JMIR nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.2196/69651
Deborah Jacques, John Will, Denise Dauterman, Kathleen Evanovich Zavotsky, Barbara Delmore, Glenn Robert Doty, Kerry O'Brien, Lisa Groom
{"title":"Evaluating Nurses' Perceptions of Documentation in the Electronic Health Record: Multimethod Analysis.","authors":"Deborah Jacques, John Will, Denise Dauterman, Kathleen Evanovich Zavotsky, Barbara Delmore, Glenn Robert Doty, Kerry O'Brien, Lisa Groom","doi":"10.2196/69651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurses are one of the largest user groups of the electronic health record (EHR) system, relying on its tools to support patient care and nursing workflows. Recent studies suggested that the redesign of nursing documentation may reduce the time spent in the EHR system and improve nurse satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess nurses' perceptions of the redesigned EHR, evaluate the impact of documentation interventions, and identify future improvement needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guided by the American Nursing Informatics Association's Six Domains of Burden conceptual framework, this multimethod project combined both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Registered nurses across the academic health system were recruited via email invitations to participate in focus group discussions. The focus groups were conducted via a web conference and ranged from 60 to 90 minutes in duration. The focus group discussions were transcribed and analyzed through thematic analysis. The EHR vendor's time data were used to analyze nurses' time spent in documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 20 registered nurses participated in the focus group discussions, and 17 nurses completed the demographic survey; 88% (15/17) of participants had ≥3 years of EHR experience at the academic health system, and 53% (9/17) self-reported being competent in the EHR system. The following six themes emerged: positive feedback, usability and workflow opportunities, nuisance, training and education, communication, and time spent in the system. EHR vendor time data revealed that the time spent in flowsheets averaged 31.11% per 12-hour shift.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, participants reported a positive experience and that the EHR supported patient care. There are opportunities to further reduce redundancies in documentation and implement programs that support continuous learning about EHR and health technology tools. Specific suggestions include optimizing the oral health assessment tool. Analyzing frontline nursing perspectives in the redesign of EHR workflows is imperative for identifying interventions that support nurses' satisfaction with the EHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":73556,"journal":{"name":"JMIR nursing","volume":"8 ","pages":"e69651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/69651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurses are one of the largest user groups of the electronic health record (EHR) system, relying on its tools to support patient care and nursing workflows. Recent studies suggested that the redesign of nursing documentation may reduce the time spent in the EHR system and improve nurse satisfaction.

Objective: We aimed to assess nurses' perceptions of the redesigned EHR, evaluate the impact of documentation interventions, and identify future improvement needs.

Methods: Guided by the American Nursing Informatics Association's Six Domains of Burden conceptual framework, this multimethod project combined both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Registered nurses across the academic health system were recruited via email invitations to participate in focus group discussions. The focus groups were conducted via a web conference and ranged from 60 to 90 minutes in duration. The focus group discussions were transcribed and analyzed through thematic analysis. The EHR vendor's time data were used to analyze nurses' time spent in documentation.

Results: In total, 20 registered nurses participated in the focus group discussions, and 17 nurses completed the demographic survey; 88% (15/17) of participants had ≥3 years of EHR experience at the academic health system, and 53% (9/17) self-reported being competent in the EHR system. The following six themes emerged: positive feedback, usability and workflow opportunities, nuisance, training and education, communication, and time spent in the system. EHR vendor time data revealed that the time spent in flowsheets averaged 31.11% per 12-hour shift.

Conclusions: Overall, participants reported a positive experience and that the EHR supported patient care. There are opportunities to further reduce redundancies in documentation and implement programs that support continuous learning about EHR and health technology tools. Specific suggestions include optimizing the oral health assessment tool. Analyzing frontline nursing perspectives in the redesign of EHR workflows is imperative for identifying interventions that support nurses' satisfaction with the EHR.

评估护士对电子健康档案文件的认知:多方法分析。
背景:护士是电子健康记录(EHR)系统最大的用户群体之一,依靠其工具来支持患者护理和护理工作流程。最近的研究表明,重新设计护理文件可以减少在电子病历系统中花费的时间,提高护士的满意度。目的:我们旨在评估护士对重新设计的电子病历的看法,评估文件干预的影响,并确定未来的改进需求。方法:在美国护理信息学协会的六个负担领域概念框架的指导下,这个多方法项目结合了定性和定量方法。通过电子邮件邀请整个学术卫生系统的注册护士参加焦点小组讨论。焦点小组通过网络会议进行,持续时间从60到90分钟不等。通过专题分析对焦点小组讨论进行记录和分析。EHR供应商的时间数据被用来分析护士花在文件上的时间。结果:共有20名注册护士参加了焦点小组讨论,17名护士完成了人口统计调查;88%(15/17)的参与者在学术卫生系统有3年以上的电子病历工作经验,53%(9/17)的参与者自我报告能够胜任电子病历系统。以下六个主题出现了:积极的反馈,可用性和工作流机会,麻烦,培训和教育,沟通,以及花在系统上的时间。EHR供应商的时间数据显示,每12小时轮班,在流程表上花费的时间平均为31.11%。结论:总体而言,参与者报告了积极的体验,并且电子病历支持了患者护理。有机会进一步减少文件冗余,并实施支持持续学习电子病历和卫生技术工具的计划。具体建议包括优化口腔健康评估工具。在重新设计电子病历工作流程时,分析一线护理观点对于确定支持护士对电子病历满意度的干预措施是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信