Artificial Intelligence–Based Radiomic Model in Craniopharyngiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Diagnosis, Segmentation, and Classification
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence–Based Radiomic Model in Craniopharyngiomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Diagnosis, Segmentation, and Classification","authors":"Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh , Bardia Hajikarimloo , Behnaz Niroomand , Nasira Faizi , Nasiha Faizi , Mohammad Amin Habibi , Shahin Mohammadzadeh , Reza Soltani","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are rare, benign brain tumors originating from Rathke's pouch remnants, typically located in the sellar/parasellar region. Accurate differentiation is crucial due to varying prognoses, with adamantinomatous CPs having higher recurrence and worse outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging struggles with overlapping features, complicating diagnosis. This study evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing, segmenting, and classifying CPs, emphasizing its potential to improve clinical decision-making, particularly for radiologists and neurosurgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review and meta-analysis assess AI applications in diagnosing, segmenting, and classifying on CP patients. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for studies employing AI models in patients with CP. Performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve were extracted and synthesized.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eleven studies involving 1916 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled results revealed a sensitivity of 0.740 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.673–0.808), specificity of 0.813 (95% CI: 0.729–0.898), and accuracy of 0.746 (95% CI: 0.679–0.813). The area under the curve for diagnosis was 0.793 (95% CI: 0.719–0.866), and for classification, it was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.846–0.951). The sensitivity for segmentation was found to be 0.755 (95% CI: 0.704–0.805).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>AI-based models show strong potential in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making process for CPs. These findings support the use of AI tools for more reliable preoperative assessment, leading to better treatment planning and patient outcomes. Further research with larger datasets is needed to optimize and validate AI applications in clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 124050"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025004061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are rare, benign brain tumors originating from Rathke's pouch remnants, typically located in the sellar/parasellar region. Accurate differentiation is crucial due to varying prognoses, with adamantinomatous CPs having higher recurrence and worse outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging struggles with overlapping features, complicating diagnosis. This study evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing, segmenting, and classifying CPs, emphasizing its potential to improve clinical decision-making, particularly for radiologists and neurosurgeons.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis assess AI applications in diagnosing, segmenting, and classifying on CP patients. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for studies employing AI models in patients with CP. Performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve were extracted and synthesized.
Results
Eleven studies involving 1916 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled results revealed a sensitivity of 0.740 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.673–0.808), specificity of 0.813 (95% CI: 0.729–0.898), and accuracy of 0.746 (95% CI: 0.679–0.813). The area under the curve for diagnosis was 0.793 (95% CI: 0.719–0.866), and for classification, it was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.846–0.951). The sensitivity for segmentation was found to be 0.755 (95% CI: 0.704–0.805).
Conclusions
AI-based models show strong potential in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making process for CPs. These findings support the use of AI tools for more reliable preoperative assessment, leading to better treatment planning and patient outcomes. Further research with larger datasets is needed to optimize and validate AI applications in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS