Alberto Villagran Asiares , Teresa Vitadello , Osvaldo M. Velarde , Sylvia Schachoff , Tareq Ibrahim , Stephan G. Nekolla
{"title":"Can multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis really enhance the prediction of myocardial recovery after CTO revascularization? A machine learning study","authors":"Alberto Villagran Asiares , Teresa Vitadello , Osvaldo M. Velarde , Sylvia Schachoff , Tareq Ibrahim , Stephan G. Nekolla","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of FDG-PET/MRI multiparametric analysis in predicting myocardial wall motion recovery following revascularization of chronic coronary total occlusions (CTO), incorporating both traditional and machine learning approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study assessed fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (FDG), late gadolinium enhanced MR imaging (LGE), and MR wall motion abnormalities (WMA) of the left ventricle walls of a clinical cohort with 21 CTO patients (62 ± 9 years, 20 men). All patients were examined using a PET/MRI prior to revascularization and a follow-up cardiac MRI six months later. Prediction models for wall motion recovery after perfusion restoration were developed using linear and nonlinear algorithms as well as multiparametric variables. Performance and prediction explainability were evaluated in a 5x2 cross-validation framework, using ROC AUC and McNemar’s test modified for clustered matched-pair data, and Shapley values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Based on 79 CTO-subtended myocardial wall segments with wall motion abnormalities at baseline, the reference logistic regression model LGE + FDG obtained 0.55(SE = 0.07) in the clustered ROC AUC (cROC AUC) and 0.17(0.05) in the Global Absolute Shapley value. The reference outperformed FDG standalone in cROC AUC (-35(17) %, p < 0.0001), but not LGE standalone (11(12) %, p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the marginal probabilities of success of these three models. Moreover, no significant improvements (differences < 10 % in cROC AUC, and < 20 % in Global Absolute Shapley, p > 0.05) were found when using mixed effects logistic regression, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, Naive Bayes, random forest, and support vector machine, with multiparametric combinations of FDG, LGE, and/or WMA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this clinical cohort, adding more complex interactions between PET/MRI imaging of cardiac function, infarct extension, and/or metabolism did not enhance the prediction of wall motion recovery after perfusion restoration. This finding raises the question whether multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis has demonstrable benefits in risk stratification for CTO revascularization. Further studies with larger cohorts and external validation datasets are crucial to clarify this question and refine the role of multiparametric imaging in this context.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 84-98"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388925000388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of FDG-PET/MRI multiparametric analysis in predicting myocardial wall motion recovery following revascularization of chronic coronary total occlusions (CTO), incorporating both traditional and machine learning approaches.
Methods
This retrospective study assessed fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (FDG), late gadolinium enhanced MR imaging (LGE), and MR wall motion abnormalities (WMA) of the left ventricle walls of a clinical cohort with 21 CTO patients (62 ± 9 years, 20 men). All patients were examined using a PET/MRI prior to revascularization and a follow-up cardiac MRI six months later. Prediction models for wall motion recovery after perfusion restoration were developed using linear and nonlinear algorithms as well as multiparametric variables. Performance and prediction explainability were evaluated in a 5x2 cross-validation framework, using ROC AUC and McNemar’s test modified for clustered matched-pair data, and Shapley values.
Results
Based on 79 CTO-subtended myocardial wall segments with wall motion abnormalities at baseline, the reference logistic regression model LGE + FDG obtained 0.55(SE = 0.07) in the clustered ROC AUC (cROC AUC) and 0.17(0.05) in the Global Absolute Shapley value. The reference outperformed FDG standalone in cROC AUC (-35(17) %, p < 0.0001), but not LGE standalone (11(12) %, p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the marginal probabilities of success of these three models. Moreover, no significant improvements (differences < 10 % in cROC AUC, and < 20 % in Global Absolute Shapley, p > 0.05) were found when using mixed effects logistic regression, decision tree, k-nearest neighbor, Naive Bayes, random forest, and support vector machine, with multiparametric combinations of FDG, LGE, and/or WMA.
Conclusion
In this clinical cohort, adding more complex interactions between PET/MRI imaging of cardiac function, infarct extension, and/or metabolism did not enhance the prediction of wall motion recovery after perfusion restoration. This finding raises the question whether multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis has demonstrable benefits in risk stratification for CTO revascularization. Further studies with larger cohorts and external validation datasets are crucial to clarify this question and refine the role of multiparametric imaging in this context.
期刊介绍:
Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing.
Focuses of the articles are:
-Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine
-Dosimetry and radiation protection
-Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance
-Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography
-Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays
-Electronic processing of biosignals
-Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics
In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.