The diagnostic value of thoracic ultrasound in thoracic surgery consultations: a new tool in pleural effusion decision-making.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-17 DOI:10.5114/kitp.2025.148550
Burcu Kılıç, Yaman Khoraki, Ömer Faruk Sağlam, Gizem Özçıbık Işık, Tolunay Turan, Ezel Erşen, H Volkan Kara, Akif Turna, Kamil Kaynak
{"title":"The diagnostic value of thoracic ultrasound in thoracic surgery consultations: a new tool in pleural effusion decision-making.","authors":"Burcu Kılıç, Yaman Khoraki, Ömer Faruk Sağlam, Gizem Özçıbık Işık, Tolunay Turan, Ezel Erşen, H Volkan Kara, Akif Turna, Kamil Kaynak","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2025.148550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic ultrasound (US) is a practical tool in radiology that has been commonly used for decades. Its daily clinic use in thoracic surgery is rising, and scientific evidence is needed to support its use.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of handheld, portable thoracic ultrasound scanning (HH-US) in patients referred to the thoracic surgery outpatient clinic with suspected pleural effusion and compare the diagnostic role with chest X-rays (CXR) or computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed the patients between 2020 and 2023 who were referred to our outpatient clinic with various symptoms and having differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. In total, 91 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ultrasonographic (US) scans were performed by thoracic surgeons who were educated and certified in ultrasonography training. All patients underwent US first and then were referred for chest X-ray or computed tomography. All the results were compared focusing on the efficacy of US initially. If the amount of the effusion required drainage, thoracentesis was carried out with US support. The indications, methods, time, and related complications, with demographic data of the patients were recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 57 (62.6%) male and 34 female (37.4%) patients. Only diagnostic thoracentesis was performed in 16 patients, catheter thoracostomy was performed in 47 patients, minimal effusion not requiring pleural intervention was observed in 6 patients (2 patients were trauma patients who applied to the emergency department), minimal effusion was detected in 14 patients, and no intervention was performed. No complications were observed. The sensitivity of US in detecting fluid effusion compared to CXR was 83.3%, while its sensitivity compared to thorax computed tomography (CT) was 88.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proficient thoracic surgeons can effectively employ ultrasound devices for diagnosing and managing pleural effusions. This would be helpful for decision making and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12019981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2025.148550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic ultrasound (US) is a practical tool in radiology that has been commonly used for decades. Its daily clinic use in thoracic surgery is rising, and scientific evidence is needed to support its use.

Aim: We aimed to determine the diagnostic value of handheld, portable thoracic ultrasound scanning (HH-US) in patients referred to the thoracic surgery outpatient clinic with suspected pleural effusion and compare the diagnostic role with chest X-rays (CXR) or computed tomography (CT).

Material and methods: We analyzed the patients between 2020 and 2023 who were referred to our outpatient clinic with various symptoms and having differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. In total, 91 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ultrasonographic (US) scans were performed by thoracic surgeons who were educated and certified in ultrasonography training. All patients underwent US first and then were referred for chest X-ray or computed tomography. All the results were compared focusing on the efficacy of US initially. If the amount of the effusion required drainage, thoracentesis was carried out with US support. The indications, methods, time, and related complications, with demographic data of the patients were recorded and analyzed.

Results: There were 57 (62.6%) male and 34 female (37.4%) patients. Only diagnostic thoracentesis was performed in 16 patients, catheter thoracostomy was performed in 47 patients, minimal effusion not requiring pleural intervention was observed in 6 patients (2 patients were trauma patients who applied to the emergency department), minimal effusion was detected in 14 patients, and no intervention was performed. No complications were observed. The sensitivity of US in detecting fluid effusion compared to CXR was 83.3%, while its sensitivity compared to thorax computed tomography (CT) was 88.5%.

Conclusions: Proficient thoracic surgeons can effectively employ ultrasound devices for diagnosing and managing pleural effusions. This would be helpful for decision making and treatment.

胸部超声在胸外科会诊中的诊断价值:胸腔积液决策的新工具。
胸部超声(US)是一种实用的放射学工具,已被广泛使用了几十年。它在胸外科手术中的日常临床应用正在上升,需要科学证据来支持它的使用。目的:探讨手持式、便携式胸部超声扫描(HH-US)对胸外科门诊疑似胸腔积液患者的诊断价值,并与胸部x光片(CXR)或计算机断层扫描(CT)的诊断价值进行比较。材料和方法:我们分析了2020年至2023年间转诊到我们门诊就诊的各种症状和鉴别诊断的胸腔积液患者。共有91例患者符合纳入标准。超声(US)扫描是由受过超声培训并获得认证的胸外科医生进行的。所有患者均先行超声检查,然后转介胸部x线或计算机断层扫描。对所有结果进行比较,首先关注US的疗效。如果积液量需要引流,则在US支持下进行胸穿刺。记录并分析患者的适应证、方法、时间、相关并发症及人口学资料。结果:男性57例(62.6%),女性34例(37.4%)。16例患者仅行诊断性胸腔穿刺,47例患者行导管开胸术,6例患者出现少量积液,无需胸腔干预(其中2例为外伤患者,申请急诊科),14例患者发现少量积液,未进行干预。无并发症发生。超声对胸腔积液的敏感度较CXR为83.3%,较CT为88.5%。结论:熟练的胸外科医生可以有效地利用超声设备诊断和处理胸腔积液。这将有助于决策和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信