Imaging Phenotypes Assessment by Using Quantitative Parameters for CT-Defined Subtypes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Wufei Chen, Jing Zhu, Jixiang Ni, Xiang Li, Yu Li, Wen Yin, Shan Zhu, Yang Xiao, Ying Wang, Hui Huang, Yi Hu
{"title":"Imaging Phenotypes Assessment by Using Quantitative Parameters for CT-Defined Subtypes of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.","authors":"Wufei Chen, Jing Zhu, Jixiang Ni, Xiang Li, Yu Li, Wen Yin, Shan Zhu, Yang Xiao, Ying Wang, Hui Huang, Yi Hu","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S505092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the quantitative imaging phenotype differences for CT-defined subtypes classified by the Fleischner Society in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 228 COPD patients who underwent non-enhanced chest CT screening from 2018 to 2024 were included. All patients were divided into type-A (Absent emphysema that no or mild emphysema, Goddard score ≤8, regardless of bronchial wall thickening), type-E (Emphysema that significant emphysema, Goddard score >8, without bronchial wall thickening), and type-M (Mixed emphysema and bronchial wall thickening that both significant emphysema, Goddard score >8, and bronchial wall thickening ≥ grade 1 in ≥1 lung lobe). Imaging phenotype parameters included lung airspace analysis (LAA) and LAA size analysis (LAASA) in emphysema, airway wall, lung vessels and interstitial lung disease (ILD) extracted by a COPD-specific analysis software were analysis among three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative assessment of emphysema among three image phenotypes showed significant differences in full emphysema and full emphysema ratio based on LAA among three groups (P < 0.05). The areas of consolidation, ground-glass opacity, and reticular patterns were significantly larger in type-M than the other two types (P < 0.05). Quantitative assessment of small airways disease and small vessel parameters found smaller lumen-volume and larger wall-volume in whole lung level in the emphysema phenotype of type-M (P < 0.05) were found in the small vessel count in distance of 6 mm and 9mm from the pleura were significant differences among three groups (P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the higher proportion of full emphysema ratio and wall-volume, a proportion of smaller lumen-volume, and a more noticeable interstitial lung alterations were associated with type-M.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A quantitative CT evaluation can further delineate the imaging phenotypes characteristics thereby in guiding to early diagnosis, severity assessment, and therapeutic recommendations in COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"1279-1286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12047287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S505092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the quantitative imaging phenotype differences for CT-defined subtypes classified by the Fleischner Society in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Patients and methods: A total of 228 COPD patients who underwent non-enhanced chest CT screening from 2018 to 2024 were included. All patients were divided into type-A (Absent emphysema that no or mild emphysema, Goddard score ≤8, regardless of bronchial wall thickening), type-E (Emphysema that significant emphysema, Goddard score >8, without bronchial wall thickening), and type-M (Mixed emphysema and bronchial wall thickening that both significant emphysema, Goddard score >8, and bronchial wall thickening ≥ grade 1 in ≥1 lung lobe). Imaging phenotype parameters included lung airspace analysis (LAA) and LAA size analysis (LAASA) in emphysema, airway wall, lung vessels and interstitial lung disease (ILD) extracted by a COPD-specific analysis software were analysis among three groups.

Results: Quantitative assessment of emphysema among three image phenotypes showed significant differences in full emphysema and full emphysema ratio based on LAA among three groups (P < 0.05). The areas of consolidation, ground-glass opacity, and reticular patterns were significantly larger in type-M than the other two types (P < 0.05). Quantitative assessment of small airways disease and small vessel parameters found smaller lumen-volume and larger wall-volume in whole lung level in the emphysema phenotype of type-M (P < 0.05) were found in the small vessel count in distance of 6 mm and 9mm from the pleura were significant differences among three groups (P < 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the higher proportion of full emphysema ratio and wall-volume, a proportion of smaller lumen-volume, and a more noticeable interstitial lung alterations were associated with type-M.

Conclusion: A quantitative CT evaluation can further delineate the imaging phenotypes characteristics thereby in guiding to early diagnosis, severity assessment, and therapeutic recommendations in COPD patients.

用定量参数评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病ct定义亚型的影像学表型
目的:探讨慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者经Fleischner学会分类的ct定义亚型的定量影像学表型差异。患者和方法:共纳入2018年至2024年接受非增强胸部CT筛查的228例COPD患者。所有患者分为a型(无肺气肿,无或轻度肺气肿,Goddard评分≤8分,无支气管壁增厚)、e型(肺气肿,明显肺气肿,Goddard评分bbbb8分,无支气管壁增厚)、m型(混合型肺气肿和支气管壁增厚,均明显肺气肿,Goddard评分bbbb8分,≥1肺叶支气管壁增厚≥1级)。影像表型参数包括肺气肿、气道壁、肺血管和间质性肺疾病(ILD)的肺空域分析(LAA)和LAA大小分析(LAASA),通过copd特异性分析软件进行分析。结果:三种影像表型间气肿定量评估结果显示,三组间基于LAA的全气肿及全气肿比例差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。m型的实变区、毛玻璃样混浊区、网状区明显大于其他两种类型(P < 0.05)。定量评价小气道病变及小血管参数发现,m型肺气肿表型在全肺水平上的管腔体积较小,壁腔体积较大(P < 0.05),距胸膜6 mm和9mm处的小血管计数三组间差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,肺气肿比例和壁容积比例较高,管腔容积比例较小,肺间质改变更明显与m型相关。结论:定量的CT评价可以进一步描绘COPD患者的影像学表型特征,从而指导COPD患者的早期诊断、严重程度评估和治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信