Dynamics in distress and quality of life in patients undergoing radiation therapy: a prospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hana Park, Danbee Kang, Tae Hoon Lee, Dongryul Oh
{"title":"Dynamics in distress and quality of life in patients undergoing radiation therapy: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Hana Park, Danbee Kang, Tae Hoon Lee, Dongryul Oh","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09371-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study used a mobile-based assessment tool to evaluate the dynamics of distress and quality of life (QoL) in patients with esophageal, head and neck, and rectal cancers undergoing radiation therapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2022 and July 2023 and included 100 patients who had completed assessments at pre-RT, weeks 2, 4, and 6 of RT, and 1 month post-treatment. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients showed a 100% response rate to the mobile-based assessment at pre-RT, week 6, and post-treatment, with a 95% response rate at weeks 2 and 4 of RT. Of the 100 patients, 33% experienced marked distress pre-RT, with distress levels peaking at 67% at weeks 2 and 4. More than 50% of the patients reported experiencing sleep disturbance, fatigue, worry, or anxiety post-treatment. Their QoL dropped significantly during treatment from levels in weeks 2 and 4 and returned to pre-treatment levels post-RT. Higher distress was consistently correlated with poorer QoL. Emotional and physical issues such as pain and sleep disturbance were significantly associated with poor QoL pre- and post-RT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RT was associated with increased distress and a temporary reduction in QoL. Key factors including sleep problems, fatigue, and emotional distress require targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. Mobile technology use has proven effective in tracking distress and QoL in patients with cancer undergoing RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 5","pages":"379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09371-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study used a mobile-based assessment tool to evaluate the dynamics of distress and quality of life (QoL) in patients with esophageal, head and neck, and rectal cancers undergoing radiation therapy (RT).

Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted between November 2022 and July 2023 and included 100 patients who had completed assessments at pre-RT, weeks 2, 4, and 6 of RT, and 1 month post-treatment. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire were used.

Results: All patients showed a 100% response rate to the mobile-based assessment at pre-RT, week 6, and post-treatment, with a 95% response rate at weeks 2 and 4 of RT. Of the 100 patients, 33% experienced marked distress pre-RT, with distress levels peaking at 67% at weeks 2 and 4. More than 50% of the patients reported experiencing sleep disturbance, fatigue, worry, or anxiety post-treatment. Their QoL dropped significantly during treatment from levels in weeks 2 and 4 and returned to pre-treatment levels post-RT. Higher distress was consistently correlated with poorer QoL. Emotional and physical issues such as pain and sleep disturbance were significantly associated with poor QoL pre- and post-RT.

Conclusion: RT was associated with increased distress and a temporary reduction in QoL. Key factors including sleep problems, fatigue, and emotional distress require targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes. Mobile technology use has proven effective in tracking distress and QoL in patients with cancer undergoing RT.

放射治疗患者的痛苦动态和生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的:本研究使用基于移动的评估工具来评估食管癌、头颈癌和直肠癌患者接受放射治疗(RT)的痛苦和生活质量(QoL)的动态。方法:在2022年11月至2023年7月期间进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,包括100名患者,他们在放疗前、放疗第2周、第4周和第6周以及治疗后1个月完成了评估。使用国家综合癌症网络痛苦温度计和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷。结果:所有患者在放射治疗前、第6周和治疗后对基于移动的评估的反应率均为100%,在放射治疗的第2周和第4周的反应率为95%。在100名患者中,33%的患者在放射治疗前经历了明显的痛苦,在第2周和第4周的痛苦水平达到67%。超过50%的患者报告在治疗后出现睡眠障碍、疲劳、担忧或焦虑。他们的生活质量在治疗期间从第2周和第4周的水平显著下降,并在rt后恢复到治疗前的水平。抑郁程度越高,生活质量越差。情绪和身体问题,如疼痛和睡眠障碍与rt前后较差的生活质量显著相关。结论:RT与痛苦的增加和生活质量的暂时降低有关。关键因素包括睡眠问题、疲劳和情绪困扰,需要有针对性的干预来改善患者的预后。移动技术的使用已被证明可以有效地跟踪接受放射治疗的癌症患者的痛苦和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信