Caregiving experience of family caregivers for people with colorectal cancer: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Meng Liu, Nantaporn Sansiriphun, Warawan Udomkhwamsuk, Craig Lockwood, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon
{"title":"Caregiving experience of family caregivers for people with colorectal cancer: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Meng Liu, Nantaporn Sansiriphun, Warawan Udomkhwamsuk, Craig Lockwood, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aims to synthesize the most robust evidence regarding family caregivers' experiences of caring for people with colorectal cancer (CRC).</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caring for people with CRC places a significant burden on caregivers that can affect their physical and psychological well-being. Understanding the unique experiences of family caregivers is essential for developing effective support systems that enhance their well-being.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies exploring the experiences of family caregivers caring for people with primary CRC. The studies will focus on qualitative data, including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, qualitative descriptive studies, action research, feminist research, mixed methods studies, and program evaluations with embedded qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The search strategy will aim to locate published and unpublished studies, with no date or language restrictions. PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases will be searched. The search for gray literature will include Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Two reviewers will independently select the studies, extract data, and critically appraise the methodological quality of the studies using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The findings will be pooled using the meta-aggregation approach or presented in narrative format. The final synthesized findings will be graded for certainty according to the ConQual approach.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024517472.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD 42024517472.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to synthesize the most robust evidence regarding family caregivers' experiences of caring for people with colorectal cancer (CRC).

Introduction: Caring for people with CRC places a significant burden on caregivers that can affect their physical and psychological well-being. Understanding the unique experiences of family caregivers is essential for developing effective support systems that enhance their well-being.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies exploring the experiences of family caregivers caring for people with primary CRC. The studies will focus on qualitative data, including designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, qualitative descriptive studies, action research, feminist research, mixed methods studies, and program evaluations with embedded qualitative data.

Methods: The review will follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. The search strategy will aim to locate published and unpublished studies, with no date or language restrictions. PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases will be searched. The search for gray literature will include Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Two reviewers will independently select the studies, extract data, and critically appraise the methodological quality of the studies using the JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The findings will be pooled using the meta-aggregation approach or presented in narrative format. The final synthesized findings will be graded for certainty according to the ConQual approach.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024517472.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD 42024517472.

结直肠癌患者家庭照护者的照护经验:一项定性系统评价方案。
目的:本综述旨在综合有关家庭照顾者照顾结直肠癌(CRC)患者经验的最有力证据。导读:照顾结直肠癌患者给照顾者带来了重大负担,可能影响他们的身心健康。了解家庭照顾者的独特经历对于开发有效的支持系统以增强他们的福祉至关重要。纳入标准:本综述将考虑探讨家庭照护者照顾原发性结直肠癌患者经验的研究。这些研究将侧重于定性数据,包括诸如现象学、扎根理论、民族志、定性描述性研究、行动研究、女权主义研究、混合方法研究和嵌入定性数据的项目评估等设计。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法对定性证据进行系统评价。搜索策略的目标是找到已发表和未发表的研究,没有日期或语言限制。检索PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Scopus,中国国家知识基础设施和万方数据库。灰色文献的搜索将包括谷歌学者和ProQuest学位论文和论文。两名审稿人将独立选择研究,提取数据,并使用JBI定性研究批判性评估清单对研究的方法学质量进行批判性评估。研究结果将采用综合方法汇总或以叙述形式呈现。最终的综合结果将根据征服方法对确定性进行分级。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024517472。审核注册:PROSPERO CRD 42024517472。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信