Association of lower noninvasive fractional flow reserve values with high risk anatomic characteristics in pediatric patients with anomalous coronary arteries.

Kanwal M Farooqi, Sophia Hsien, Yun Zhang, Denis J Donovan, Maroun Yammine, Patricia Moscicki, Jacqueline Contento, Ruskin S Del Mundo, Alexandra Channing, Amee M Shah, Priyanka Asrani, Amara Majeed, Michael P Dilorenzo, Jonathan Kochav, Rachel Weller, Emile A Bacha, Andrew Goldstone, Marlon Rosenbaum, Andrew J Einstein
{"title":"Association of lower noninvasive fractional flow reserve values with high risk anatomic characteristics in pediatric patients with anomalous coronary arteries.","authors":"Kanwal M Farooqi, Sophia Hsien, Yun Zhang, Denis J Donovan, Maroun Yammine, Patricia Moscicki, Jacqueline Contento, Ruskin S Del Mundo, Alexandra Channing, Amee M Shah, Priyanka Asrani, Amara Majeed, Michael P Dilorenzo, Jonathan Kochav, Rachel Weller, Emile A Bacha, Andrew Goldstone, Marlon Rosenbaum, Andrew J Einstein","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are data on fractional flow reserve CT (CT-FFR) assessment for anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery (AAOCA) in adults, reports in children are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardiac CT angiograms of patients ages 4-21 years with AAOCA performed from 2010 to 2021 ​at a single center were retrospectively identified. Characteristics historically considered high-risk -slit-like ostium, interarterial course, or intramural segment-, symptoms suggestive of ischemia, or positive provocative testing were correlated with reduced CT-FFR values of <0.8 and ​< ​0.9. Distribution of CT-FFR values in patients with and without high-risk characteristics were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTAs for 39 patients, median age 14.3 (interquartile11.4-15.8) were of adequate quality for analysis. In anomalous right (ARCA) patients (n ​= ​30), rates of interarterial course, intramural course and acute takeoff angle were each 83.3 ​%; 80 ​% had slit-like orifice. In anomalous left (ALCA) patients (n ​= ​9), 77.8 ​% had an intramural segment, 77.8 ​% acute takeoff angle, and 66.7 ​% interarterial course; none had slit-like orifice. CT-FFR values were significantly lower in patients with ARCA and high-risk anatomic characteristics. There was no significant correlation between high-risk characteristics or intramural length, and abnormal FFR with cutoff of <0.8. With cutoff <0.9, there was correlation between slit-like orifice and abnormal RCA and circumflex CT-FFR. In patients with ARCA, intramural length correlated negatively with RCA CT-FFR value (rho ​= ​-0.67, p ​< ​0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-FFR values are lower in patients with ARCA and anatomic characteristics considered high-risk. A cutoff CT-FFR value of <0.9 correlated with slit-like orifice. Further studies are needed to show utility of CT-FFR in guiding management of AAOCA in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":94071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2025.04.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although there are data on fractional flow reserve CT (CT-FFR) assessment for anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery (AAOCA) in adults, reports in children are limited.

Methods: Cardiac CT angiograms of patients ages 4-21 years with AAOCA performed from 2010 to 2021 ​at a single center were retrospectively identified. Characteristics historically considered high-risk -slit-like ostium, interarterial course, or intramural segment-, symptoms suggestive of ischemia, or positive provocative testing were correlated with reduced CT-FFR values of <0.8 and ​< ​0.9. Distribution of CT-FFR values in patients with and without high-risk characteristics were compared.

Results: CTAs for 39 patients, median age 14.3 (interquartile11.4-15.8) were of adequate quality for analysis. In anomalous right (ARCA) patients (n ​= ​30), rates of interarterial course, intramural course and acute takeoff angle were each 83.3 ​%; 80 ​% had slit-like orifice. In anomalous left (ALCA) patients (n ​= ​9), 77.8 ​% had an intramural segment, 77.8 ​% acute takeoff angle, and 66.7 ​% interarterial course; none had slit-like orifice. CT-FFR values were significantly lower in patients with ARCA and high-risk anatomic characteristics. There was no significant correlation between high-risk characteristics or intramural length, and abnormal FFR with cutoff of <0.8. With cutoff <0.9, there was correlation between slit-like orifice and abnormal RCA and circumflex CT-FFR. In patients with ARCA, intramural length correlated negatively with RCA CT-FFR value (rho ​= ​-0.67, p ​< ​0.0001).

Conclusion: CT-FFR values are lower in patients with ARCA and anatomic characteristics considered high-risk. A cutoff CT-FFR value of <0.9 correlated with slit-like orifice. Further studies are needed to show utility of CT-FFR in guiding management of AAOCA in children.

儿童冠状动脉异常患者低无创血流储备值与高危解剖特征的关系
背景:虽然有关于成人冠状动脉异常主动脉起源(AAOCA)的分数血流储备CT (CT- ffr)评估数据,但关于儿童的报道有限。方法:回顾性分析2010年至2021年在单一中心进行的4-21岁AAOCA患者的心脏CT血管造影。历史上被认为是高风险的特征-裂隙样口、动脉间程或壁内段-、提示缺血的症状或刺激试验阳性与CT-FFR值降低相关。结果:39例患者的cta,中位年龄14.3(四分位差11.4-15.8)具有足够的分析质量。右侧异常(ARCA)患者(n = 30),动脉间程、壁内程和急性起跳角发生率均为83.3%;80%为裂隙状孔口。在左侧异常(ALCA)患者(n = 9)中,77.8%有壁内段,77.8%有急性起飞角,66.7%有动脉间程;没有一个有裂口状的孔。具有ARCA和高危解剖特征的患者CT-FFR值明显较低。结论:ARCA患者CT-FFR值较低,且解剖特征为高危。CT-FFR的截止值为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信