Partial Submandibular Gland Resection With Ultrasonic Dissector vs Electrocautery.

Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojaf011
Hallie Buckner, Anil R Shah
{"title":"Partial Submandibular Gland Resection With Ultrasonic Dissector vs Electrocautery.","authors":"Hallie Buckner, Anil R Shah","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojaf011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The superficial aspect of the submandibular gland can be removed to improve the aesthetic appearance of the face and neck. This study describes a novel surgical technique to resect part of the submandibular gland during a deep neck or facelift.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Describe the technique to remove the superficial lobe of the submandibular gland using an ultrasonic dissector. Analyze the association between the uses of ultrasonic technology and reduced postoperative complications. Compare rates of postoperative complications between standard electrocautery and ultrasonic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimental and control groups were established. A Sonicision ultrasonic dissector (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) was used for resection in the experimental group, whereas electrocautery was used for resection in the control group. Postoperative outcomes of neuropraxia, hematoma, seroma, and sialocele formation were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher's exact test in RStudio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control patients (<i>n</i> = 32) experienced 1 hematoma, 3 seromas, 3 sialoceles, and 3 neuropraxias. Experimental patients (<i>n</i> = 48) experienced 2 seromas with no hematomas, sialoceles, or neuropraxia. No association of statistical significance between reduced risk of complications and use of ultrasonic dissection was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel technique has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of partial submandibular gland resection. However, a follow-up study with a greater sample size and without confounding variables, such as intraoperative injection of Botulinum toxin, is necessary.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence 3: </strong>(Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"7 ","pages":"ojaf011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaf011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The superficial aspect of the submandibular gland can be removed to improve the aesthetic appearance of the face and neck. This study describes a novel surgical technique to resect part of the submandibular gland during a deep neck or facelift.

Objectives: Describe the technique to remove the superficial lobe of the submandibular gland using an ultrasonic dissector. Analyze the association between the uses of ultrasonic technology and reduced postoperative complications. Compare rates of postoperative complications between standard electrocautery and ultrasonic dissection.

Methods: Experimental and control groups were established. A Sonicision ultrasonic dissector (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) was used for resection in the experimental group, whereas electrocautery was used for resection in the control group. Postoperative outcomes of neuropraxia, hematoma, seroma, and sialocele formation were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using a Fisher's exact test in RStudio.

Results: Control patients (n = 32) experienced 1 hematoma, 3 seromas, 3 sialoceles, and 3 neuropraxias. Experimental patients (n = 48) experienced 2 seromas with no hematomas, sialoceles, or neuropraxia. No association of statistical significance between reduced risk of complications and use of ultrasonic dissection was found.

Conclusions: This novel technique has the potential to improve the safety and efficacy of partial submandibular gland resection. However, a follow-up study with a greater sample size and without confounding variables, such as intraoperative injection of Botulinum toxin, is necessary.

Level of evidence 3: (Therapeutic).

超声解剖术与电灼术比较。
背景:可以切除颌下腺的表面以改善面部和颈部的美观。本研究描述了一种新的手术技术,切除部分颌下腺在深颈部或面部拉皮。目的:描述用超声解剖术切除颌下腺浅叶的技术。分析超声技术的应用与减少术后并发症之间的关系。比较标准电切与超声解剖术后并发症的发生率。方法:设实验组和对照组。实验组采用超声解剖器(Covidien, Dublin, Ireland)切除,对照组采用电灼术切除。收集术后神经失用、血肿、血肿、涎泡形成情况。使用RStudio中的Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。结果:对照组32例出现1例血肿、3例血清肿、3例唾液膨出、3例神经失用。实验患者(n = 48)有2例血清肿,无血肿、唾液膨出或神经失用。超声解剖术与降低并发症风险无统计学意义。结论:这种新技术有可能提高颌下腺部分切除术的安全性和有效性。然而,随访研究与更大的样本量和没有混杂变量,如术中注射肉毒杆菌毒素,是必要的。证据等级3:(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信